Role of 11β HSD 1, rs12086634, and rs846910 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in metabolic-related skin diseases: a clinical, biochemical, and genetic study.

BACKGROUND: 11β HSD1 generates cortisol from cortisone. 11β HSD1 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was associated with metabolic syndrome (MeTS). Although the relation of acne vulgaris (AV) and skin tags (STs) with MeTS has been reported, the relationship between 11β HSD 1 SNP and cortisol activity in those patients has not studied till now. AIMS: To investigate, two 11β-HSD1 SNPs (rs846910 and rs12086634), serum lipid profile and cortisol levels in patients with AV and STs in an Egyptian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This case-control study was performed on 50 patients having STs and 50 complaining of AV and 50 sex- and age-matched controls. We searched for serum lipid profile, cortisol levels, and 11β-HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 SNPs using real time-PCR.
RESULTS: Compared to controls,11β-HSD1 rs846910 GA genotype carriers had significantly higher risks for developing AV and STs by 3.4- and 4.9-fold, respectively, and its A allele increases these risks by 3.1 and 4.4 times, respectively. Also, 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 TG genotype increases the risk of AV by 3.2-fold, as well as STs by 3.5-fold, and its G allele increases the risk of AV by 3.2-fold and STs by 7-fold. In AV and ST patients, rs846910 GA genotype demonstrated significant associations with elevated body mass index (BMI), and cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), cortisol, and decreased high density lipoprotein serum levels, respectively. However, rs12086634 GG genotype was significantly associated with increased BMI, cholesterol, and LDL serum levels in patients with AV and STs, in addition to the number of STs and serum cortisol levels in ST patients.
CONCLUSION: 11β-HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms may contribute to AV and STs pathogenesis, that may be mediated through enhancing the enzymatic activity (increasing cortisol levels). AV and STs are associated with obesity and atherogenic lipid profile. Diagnosis of AV and STs may play a role in early detection of the MeTS.

Introduction

Skin diseases are the most widespread human morbidities, affecting all populations. They were the 18th major reason of universal disability-adjusted life year in Global Burden of Disease 2013.1

Metabolic syndrome (MeTS) is diagnosed by the presence of three or more of the following criteria; increased waist circumference, high triglycerides, low high density lipoprotein (HDL) level, increased blood fasting glucose, and increased blood pressure. The most accepted theory for MeTS pathophysiology is insulin resistance. The increased body fat decreases the expression of insulin receptor substrate-1, leading to decreased insulin sensitivity. Consequently, the pancreas compensates by secreting larger quantities of insulin (hyper insulinemia). Individuals having MeTS seem to have increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.2

There is ongoing scientific interest regarding association of skin comorbidities with the MeTS, that ranges from severe diseases such as psoriasis to simple cosmetic problems like skin tags (STs) and includes the commonest ones such as acne vulgaris (AV).3

AV is one of the most common dermatological disorders. The prevalence of AV in adolescents ranges from 35 to over 90%.4 Acne develops within the pilosebaceous unit of the villous hair due to co-interaction between many factors including abnormal keratinization, excessive sebum secretion, and endocrinal factors.5

STs or acrochordons are common benign connective tissue neoplasms of the dermis that are mainly composed of loose fibrous tissue.6 They occur mainly on the neck and major flexures as small, soft protrusions.7 Histologically, STs formed of a polypoid show an acanthotic epidermis and a fibrous vascular kernel dermis.6

11β HSD 1 is a well-known cortisone reductase. It is highly expressed in major metabolic tissues including adipose tissue and liver. For local glucocorticoid action, 11β

HSD 1 diminishes cortisone to its active form (cortisol) that stimulates glucocorticoid receptors.8 Cortisol is the major steroid hormone of the glucocorticoids. It is one of the most important hormones in regulation of different immunologic and metabolic processes.9 Cortisol has been linked to several morbidities including MeTS.10

The 11β HSD 1 gene is located on chromosome 1q32-q41.11 Many studies have demonstrated a pathogenic role for 11β HSD 1 gene in metabolic diseases and detected the positive associations of 11β HSD 1 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, and MeTS.11–16

Although the relation of AV and STs to MeTS has been reported,3 the relationship between 11β HSD 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and cortisol activity in those patients has not yet been studied.

Therefore, we aimed in this study to investigate, for the first time, two 11β-HSD1 gene polymorphisms (rs846910 and rs12086634), serum lipid profile, and cortisol levels in patients with AV and STs and their characteristics in the Egyptian population.

Patients and methods

In this case–control study, we investigated 150 subjects divided into three equal groups: group I included patients with AV; group II included patients with STs; and group III included sex- and age-matched apparently healthy volunteers (control group). They were selected from Dermatology Outpatient Clinic – Menoufia University Hospital during the period from January 2018 to May 2018. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University that was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration in 1975 (revised in 2000). A written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study initiation.

We included patients from both sexes. They were in stable living conditions and maintained a general diet for 2 weeks before joining the study, and were asked to avoid vigorous exercise before blood sampling. Subjects with diabetes mellitus, hepatic diseases, thyroid disorders, Cushing’s syndrome, and those who are either on treatment or had history of treatment with drugs that can influence serum cortisol level or lipid profile (glucocorticoids, insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents, systemic retinoids, and oral contraceptive pills) within the last 3 months were excluded. Additionally, we excluded pregnant and lactating women, and those having polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

Methods

Every subject was submitted to full history taking and clinical examinations. Weight and height measuring were assessed to calculate body mass index (BMI).17 Dermatological examination for STs and AV was done. Regarding STs; their site, size, and the total number (mild disease [STs number <10], moderate [10–30 STs], and severe [STs number >30]) were evaluated.18 Also, acne severity was addressed.19 The investigations were carried out in the Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science and Medical Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. Serum lipid profile and cortisol levels, and 11β HSD 1 rs12086634 and rs846910 SNP by real time-PCR were performed.

Blood sampling

Under complete aseptic conditions and after overnight fasting, 6 mL blood samples were withdrawn from each participant and separated into two parts, one for DNA extraction that was kept in an EDTA tube. The other part was put in a plain tube, left to clot for 30 minutes at room temperature, then underwent centrifugation for 10 minutes at 4,000 × g per minute and the serum obtained was divided into aliquots, stored at –80°C until the time for lipid profile and cortisol level analysis.

Lipid profile: Quantitative estimation of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) using the colorimetric enzymatic method, using standard enzymatic colorimetric kits (Spinreact diagnostics kit, Spain) and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was elaborated by modified Friedewald equation.20

Cortisol level estimation: Serum cortisol was determined by ELISA, using a DetectX® Cortisol ELISA kit, USA.21

SNP assay. After DNA extraction by Pure link genomic DNA extraction kits (USA), the DNA extract was used for SNP assay in a total reaction volume 20 μL with 10 μL of TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix, 1.25 μL of 20×

Assay methods

TaqMan genotyping assay kits containing both primers and probes and nuclease-free water. By using the 7,500 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), the Reaction steps were as follows: 50°C for 2 minutes Pre-PCR read, then 95°C for 10 minutes and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute (cycling), and 60°C for 1 minute (Post-PCR).

The probe sequence for of the 11′- HSD1 rs12086634 was 5′CCCAGAGGATTTCT VIC/FAMCAGATGATTTCT-3′. The sequence of forward primer was 5′-GGAGGAGAATGGGAAAGGTATCAAC-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-TCCTCCTGCAAGAGATGGCTATATT-3′. While, The probe sequence for of the 11′- HSD1 rs846910 was 5′-CTGGTGGGAATVIC/FAMTCAAATCAGAGAGA-3′. the sequence of forward primer was 5′-CTCTGTTGCTTGTGCTTGATTC-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-AGAGCAGGCTTTCAGCAGATA C-3′ (Biosearch Technologies, Novato, CA, USA). Figure 1A and B shows the allelic discrimination plots of the SNP.

Figure 1

Allelic discrimination plot of 11β-HSD1 rs846910 (A/G) (A) and rs12086634 (G/T) (B).

Statistical analysis

Results were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed by IBM personal computer and statistical package SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Hardy– Weinberg equilibrium was computed to exclude any bias of results. Qualitative data were expressed using number and percent, while quantitative data were described in mean ± SD. Student’s t-test was used for comparison between two groups having quantitative variables. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for comparison of two and three groups of non-parametric variables respectively. ORs were calculated using logistic regression with CI 95%. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Personal, clinical and serological data of studied subjects

The personal and clinical data as well as the laboratory characteristics of the investigated subjects are shown in Table 1. Patient and control groups were matched as regards personal data except for BMI (P<0.001), where AV patients had a significantly higher percentage of overweight subjects, and ST patients demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of obese patients (Table 1).

Table 1

Comparison between the three studied groups regarding personal, anthropometric and laboratory data

Studied parameters of investigated subjects	Group I (n=50)		Group II (n=50)		Group III (n=50)		Test of sig.	P
	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Sex
Male	37	74.0	39	78.0	44	88.0	χ2 = 3.250	0.197
Female	13	26.0	11	22.0	6	12.0
Family history
No	24 (48%)		25 (50.0%)
Yes	26 (52%)		25 (50.0%)
AV and STs severity
Mild	34 (68)		19 (38)
Moderate	0 (0.0)		31 (62)
Severe	16 (32)		0 (0.0)
Skin tags site:
Head & neck			38 (76)
Other sites			12 (24)
Number, mean ± SD			8.73±4.78
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal	7	14.0	4	8.0	46	92.0	χ2 = 109.69*	<0.001 *
Overweight	30	60.0	16	32.0	4	8.0
Obese	13	26.0	30	60.0	0	0.0
Age (years)a	29.64±3.91		30.48±6.35		6.76±34.22		F=0.274	0.761
BMI (kg/m2)a	27.96±2.85		32.62±5.86		23.33±1.09		F=74.044*	<0.001*
Sig. bet. groups	p1<0.001*		p2=0.105		p3<0.001*
Age of onset (years)a	16.18±4.24		27.30±5.52
Duration (years)a	4.10±3.87		3.16±2.22
Cholesterol (mg/dL)a	209.8±24.56		191.8±26.27		158.1±21.31		F=59.137*	<0.001*
Sig. bet. groupsa	p1 =0.001*		p2 <0.001*		p3 <0.001*
HDL (mg/dL)a	34.80±4.63		36.84±4.99		45.84±5.68		F=65.853*	<0.001*
Sig. bet groupsa	p1=0.118		p2 <0.001*		p3 <0.001*
LDL (mg/dL)a	152.0±26.27		133.3±26.25		89.68±22.50		H=75.870	<0.001*
Sig. bet. groupsa	p1 =0.017*		p2 <0.001*		p3 <0.001*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)a	114.9±15.38		108.1±11.69		113.0±19.57		F=2.496	0.086
Cortisol level (μg/dL)a	22.44±3.69		23.10±4.09		17.18±2.83		41.176*	<0.001*
Significance between groupsa	p1=0.627		p2 <0.001*		p3 < 0.001 *

Notes: p1: P-value for comparing between group I and group II p2: P-value for comparing between group I and group III p3: P-value for comparing between group II and group III;

Data presented as mean±SD;

Significant.

Abbreviations: AV, acne vulgaris; STs, skin tags; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; n, number.

There was a considerable variance among all the studied groups regarding serum level of TC, HDL, LDL, and cortisol, but a non-significant difference regarding TG. Compared to controls, AV and STs patients exhibited significantly higher mean values of TC, LDL, and cortisol, and lower HDL serum levels (P<0.001 for all) (Table 1).

11β HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms of studied groups

Our study of 11β HSD1 rs846910 (Figure 1A) and rs12086634 (Figure 1B) SNPs showed considerable significant differences among all studied groups, regarding rs846910 (GG, GA) and rs12086634 (TT, TG, GG) genotypes (P=0.044 and P=0.023, respectively) and rs12086634 allele distribution (P=0.001) (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Comparison between the three studied groups regarding 11β-HSD1 rs846910 (A) and rs12086634 (B) genotypes and allele distribution.

By calculating ORs and CIs: we found that rs846910 GA genotype increases the risk of AV and STs by 3.4- and 4.9-fold, and its A allele increases the risk by 3.1 and 4.4, times respectively. While, rs12086634 TG genotype increases the risk of AV by 3.2-fold, as well as STs by 3.5-fold, and its G allele increases the risk of AV by 3.2-fold and STs by 7-fold (Table 2).

Table 2

Comparison between the three studied groups according to 11β-HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms

rs846910	Group I (n=50)	Group II (n=50)	Group III (n=50)	OR CI (95%) (L.L–U.L)	OR* CI*(95%) (L.L–U.L)	P P*
	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
Genotypes GG
GG	41 (82.0)	38 (76.0)	47 (82.0)	Reference	Reference
GA	9 (18.0)	12 (24.0)	3 (6.0)	3.439 (0.872–13.56)	4.947 (1.301–18.80)	0.077 0.018*
Allele
G	91 (91)	88 (88.0)	97 (97.0)	Reference	Reference
A	9 (9)	12 (12.0)	3 (3.0)	3.197 (0.839–12.18)	4.40 (1.204–16.140)	0.088 0.025*
rs12086634	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	OR CI (95%) (L.L–U.L)	OR*CI*(95%) (L.L–U.L)	P P*
Genotypes
TT	27 (54.0)	27 (54.0)	41 (82.0)	Reference	Reference
TG	13 (26.0)	14 (28.0)	5 (10.0)	3.162 (1.032–9.68)	3.50 (1.15–10.63)	0.043 0.027*
GG	10 (20.0)	9 (18.0)	4 (8.0)	2.875 (0.836–9.880)	2.52 (0.722–8.817)	0.093 0,146
Allele
T	67 (67.0)	68 (68.0)	87 (87.0)	Reference	Reference
G	33 (33.0)	32 (32.00	13 (13.0)	3.296 (1.61–6.748)	7.0 (3.4–14.4)	0.001<0.001*

Notes: OR CI (L.L–U.L); P: P-value for comparing between group I and group III OR* CI* (L.L–U.L); P*: P-value for comparing between group II and group III.

Data presented as mean±SD;

Significant.

Abbreviation: n, number.

The relationship between 11β HSD1 rs846910 genotypes and assessed parameters in patients with AV and STs

There was a significant association between rs846910 GA genotype and BMI in groups I (P=0.023) and II (P<0.001), and was predominant among obese AV and STs patients (P=0.014; P=0.005, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3

Relation between 11β-HSD1 rs846910 genotypes and BMI, lipid profile, and cortisol level in groups I and II

Anthropometric and laboratory data of studied patients	rs846910				Test of sig.	P
	GG		GA
	n	%	n	%
Group I	(n=41)		(n=9)
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal	7	17.1	0	0.0	χ2=7.921*	MCp= 0.014*
Overweight	27	65.9	3	33.3
Obese	7	17.1	6	66.7
Mean ± SD	27.54±2.83		29.89±2.15		t=2.343*	0.023*
AV severity					χ2 = 0.009	1.00
Mild	28 (68.3)		6 (66.7)
Moderate	–		–
Severe	13 (13.7)		3 (33.3)
Cholesterol (mg/dL)a	205.6±23.94		229.0±18.03		t=2.752*	0.008*
HDL (mg/dL)a	35.20±4.94		33.0±2.24		t=2.046*	0.050*
LDL (mg/dL)a	148.0±26.28		170.6±17.36		U=94.50*	0.023*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)a	112.2±14.43		127.4±13.90		t=2.889*	0.006*
Cortisol level (ug/dL)a	21.78±3.69		25.44±1.81		t=4.393*	<0.001*
Group II	(n=38)		(n=12)
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal	4	10.5	0	0.0	χ2=10.573*	MCp= 0.005*
Overweight	16	42.1	0	0.0
Obese	18	47.4	12	100.0
Mean ± SD	30.33±4.37		39.86±3.69		t=6.808*	<0.001*
STs severity
Mild	19 (50)		–
Moderate	19 (50)		12 (100)		χ2 = 0.009	0.002 *
Severe	–		–
Cholesterol (mg/dL)a	181.4±20.09		224.6±12.99		t=6.973*	<0.001*
HDL (mg/dL)a	37.63±5.03		34.33±4.10		t=2.062*	0.045*
LDL (mg/dL)a	122.2±21.82		168.5±13.65		U=19.00*	<0.001*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)a	108.0±11.11		108.2±13.91		t=0.064	0.949
Cortisol lcevel (ug/dL)a	21.95±3.90		26.75±2.01		t=5.597*	<0.001*

Note:

Data presented as mean ± SD;

Significant.

Abbreviations: AV, acne vulgaris; STs, skin tags; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; t, Student’s t-test; n, number; χ2, chi-squared test; U, Mann–Whitney test.

Regarding serum lipid profile and cortisol levels in AV and STs patients, rs846910 GA genotype was significantly associated with higher TC (P=0.008; P<0.001), LDL (P=0.023; P<0.001), and cortisol (P<0.001), and lower HDL (P=0.05; P=0.045), respectively, in addition to lower TG (P=0.006) in AV patients only (Table 3).

The relationship between 11β HSD1 rs12086634 genotypes and assessed parameters in patients with AV and STs

In AV patients, rs12086634 GG genotype carriers have significantly elevated BMI (P=0.006) and all of them were overweight and obese subjects (P=0.023). Also, these rs12086634 GG carriers recorded significantly increased TC (P=0.001) and LDL (P=0.002) serum levels. However, in the STs patient group, all rs12086634 GG genotype carriers were obese ones (P<0.001) and recorded a significantly higher number of ST lesions (0.008), and had significantly increased TC (P<0.001), LDL (P<0.001), and cortisol (P=0.005) serum levels (Table 4).

Table 4

Relation between HSD11B1rs12086634 genotypes and BMI, lipid profile, and cortisol level in groups I and II

Anthropometric and laboratory data of studied patients	rs12086634						Test of sig.	P
	TT		TG		GG
	n	%	n	%	n	%
Group I	(n=27)		(n=13)		(n=10)
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal	7	25.9	0	0.0	0	0.0	χ2=10.428*	MCp=0.023*
Overweight	17	63.0	8	61.5	5	50.0
Obese	3	11.1	5	38.5	5	50.0
Mean ± SD	26.81±2.83		29.15±2.15		29.50±2.5		F=5.698*	0.006*
AV severity
Mild	17 (63.0)		9 (69.2)		8 (80.0)
Moderate	–		–		–		χ2 = 0.919	0.669
Severe	10 (37)		4 (30.8)		2 (20)
Sig. bet. groups	p1=0.029*		p2=0.021*		p3=0.947
Cholesterol (mg/dL)a	198.8±26.58		218.5±10.17		228.3±16.04		F=8.182*	0.001*
Sig. bet. groupsa	p1=0.026*		p2=0.002*		p3=0.529
HDL (mg/dL)a	36.07±5.63		33.77±2.68		32.70±2.11		F=2.516	0.092
LDL (mg/dL)a	140.6±29.31		160.9±10.28		171.3±14.74		H=12.290*	0.002*
Sig. bet. groups	p1=0.033*		p2=0.001*		p3=0.239
Triglycerides (mg/dL)a	110.8±13.17		118.5±17.08		121.5±16.69		F=2.382	0.103
Cortisol level (ug/dL)a	21.85±3.46		22.31±4.59		24.20±2.70		F=1.516	0.230
Group II	(n=38)		(n=12)
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal	3	11.1	1	7.1	0	0.0	χ2=24.243*	MCp=<0.001*
Overweight	16	59.3	0	0.0	0	0.0
Obese	8	29.6	13	92.9	9	100
Mean ± SD	28.64±2.97		35.71±4.72		39.73±4.34		F=35.656*	<0.001*
STs severity
Mild	15 (55.6)		4 (28.6)		–
Moderate	12 (44.4)		10 (71.4)		12 (100.0)
Severe	–		–		–		χ2 = 9.576*	0.008*
Sig. bet. groups	p1<0.001*		p2<0.001*		p3=0.042*
Cholesterol (mg/dL)a	172.3±12.58		207.9±18.64		224.9±13.45		F=55.329*	<0.001*
Sig. bet. groups	p1<0.001*		p2<0.001*		p3=0.025*
HDL (mg/dL)a	38.11±4.69		36.14±5.67		34.11±3.72		F=2.506	0.092
LDL (mg/dL)a	112.5±14.52		150.8±20.05		168.6±12.99		H=33.625*	<0.001*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)a	108.8±10.20		104.7±12.20		111.1±15.02		F=0.928	0.402
Cortisol level (ug/dL)a	21.76±4.08		23.39±3.67		26.67±2.40		F=5.899*	0.005*
Sig. bet. groups	p1=0.386		p2=0.004*		p3=0.111

Note:

Data presented as mean±SD;

Significant.

Abbreviations: AV, acne vulgaris; STs, skin tags; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; t, Students t-test; χ2, chi-squared test; U, Mann–Whitney test; n, number.

The relationship between rs12086634 and rs846910 genotypes and BMI, serum lipid profile, and cortisol levels in the control group

No significant relations were detected among different rs12086634 and rs846910 genotypes regarding BMI, serum lipid profile, and cortisol levels in the control subjects except rs846910 GA genotype that was significantly associated with high BMI (P=0.02) and elevated cortisol serum levels (P=0.025) (Table 5).

Table 5

Relation between rs12086634 and rs846910 genotypes and BMI, serum lipid profile, and cortisol levels in the control group

Anthropometric and laboratory data	rs846910			t-test		P
	GG (n=47) Mean ± SD	GA (n=3) Mean ± SD
BMI (kg m2)	29.44±3.77	34.46±0.51		2.283		0.02*
Cholesterol (mg/dL)	157.33±21.18	170.47±23.69		1.037		0.305
Triglyceride (mg/dL)	112.97±20.11	113.33±7.63		0.301		0.976
LDL (mg/dL)	88.8±21.8	102.14±33.69		0.969		0.327
HDL (mg/dL)	45.85±5.39	44.66±10.96		0.545		0.957
Cortisol (ug/dL)	16.95±2.72	20.66±2.30		2.298		0.025*
Anthropometric and laboratory data	rs12086634				F	P
	TT (n=41) Mean ± SD	TG (n=5) Mean ± SD	GG (n=4) Mean ± SD
BMI (kg/m2)	31±2.09	33.7±0.68	33.42±0.72		0.969	0.411
Cholesterol (mg/dL)	148.6±6.63	161±3.84	165±4.30		1.2	0.381
Triglyceride (mg/dL)	99.25±1.49	100±2.04	108±6.99		1.64	0.271
LDL (mg/dL)	80.5±6.49	82.9±5.48	85.75±6.49		1.83	0.198
HDL (mg/dL)	48.25±1.43	47.0±1.22	45.7±0.75		0.907	0.430
Cortisol (ug/dL)	17.0±0.70	19.0±1.44	19.5±1		0.81	0.487

Abbreviations: F, ANOVA test; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins.

Correlation between cortisol serum level and different parameters in patients with AV and STs

In AV and STs patients, there were significant positive correlations between cortisol levels with disease severity (r=0.48, P<0.001 and r=0.294, P=0.038), BMI (r=0.671, P<0.001 and r=0.324, P=0.022), and serum levels of LDL (r=0.384, P=0.006 and r=0.415, P=0.003) and TC (r=0.388, P=0.005 and r=0.304, P=0.004, respectively), in addition to TG (r=0.549, P<0.001) and negative correlation regarding HDL (r= –0467, P<0.001) in AV patients only (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Correlation between cortisol serum level and disease severity in groups I and II (A), BMI in groups I and II (B), TC in groups I and II (C), HDL in group I (D), LDL in group I and II (E), and TG in group I (F): showing significant positive correlations with disease severity (r=0.48, P<0.001 and r=0.294, P=0.038), BMI (r=0.671, P<0.001 and r=0.324, P=0.022), and serum levels of LDL (r=0.384, P=0.006 and r=0.415, P=0.003) and TC (r=0.388, P=0.005 and r=0.304, P=0.004) in AV and STs patient groups, respectively, in addition to TG (r=0.549, P<0.001) and negative correlation regarding HDL (r= –0467, P<0.001) in AV patients only.

Abbreviations: AV, acne vulgaris; LDL, low density lipoproteins; HDL, high density lipoproteins; ST, skin tag.

Discussion

The present work was designed to spot a beam of light on the possible role of 11β-HSD1 gene polymorphism in the pathogenesis of AV and STs, two of the most common metabolic-related skin diseases. Owing to the location of 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 and rs846910 in the transcription initiation place12 and considering the effect of 11β-HSD1 on cortisone activation and metabolic control,8,10 we investigated these two variants (rs12086634 and rs846910) of 11β-HSD1 gene and their end product (cortisol level), with lipid profile in a sample of Egyptian patients having AV and STs.

Our participants in both patient groups (AV and STs) had a significantly higher BMI than that of controls. This demonstrated high BMI represents a major risk factor of MeTS,22 that was previously reported in Norwegian acne female patients.23 Additionally, a low BMI was associated with low acne prevalence in Taiwanese girls and boys,24 as well as, Italian adolescents and young adults.25 Also in STs, Jusuf et al26 demonstrated a significantly high BMI.

Plausible mechanisms that explain the pathogenesis of STs in obesity could be hyperinsulinemia that increases IGF-1 which stimulates the proliferation of both keratinocytes27 and dermal fibroblasts,28 and/or increased leptin levels that has the ability to induce proliferation of keratinocytes.27,29 However, in AV, hyperinsulinemia influences follicular epithelial growth and stimulates sebocyte proliferation and androgen-mediated sebum secretion.30 Additionally, excess adipose tissue could induce lipid peroxidation affecting the inflammatory process and acne pathogenesis.31

AV is a multifactorial skin disease, in which hormones including glucocorticoids were implicated.32 Confirming this speculation, our AV patients demonstrated a significant increase in their cortisol serum levels than their matched peers. Steroids are supposed to increase acne eruptions (steroid acne) through increasing toll-like receptor 2 gene expressions with further release of the pro-inflammatory mediators.33

Altered lipid profile was reported in AV patients in different populations,34,35 with some differences in the evaluated results, that could be influenced by different nutritional state, diet, and lifestyle.35 Herein, we revealed significantly higher TC, LDL, and lower HDL in AV patients than controls. Therefore, we suggested that dyslipidemia may play an active role in AV pathogenesis, and may be a new target in AV management programs. Administration of a high niacin dose (≥200 mg/day), that regulates plasma lipids, is advised in the treatment of AV.36

Also, our STs’ patients demonstrated elevated cortisol serum levels and atherogenic lipid profile in the form of significantly high TC, LDL, and lower HDL serum levels. In line with these findings, are that of Erdoğan et al37 and Shah et al.38

As the central nervous system (CNS) innervates adipose tissue via efferent pathways of a sympathetic nervous system, it was proposed that CNS is involved in the regulation of fat storage and lipolysis.39 It was demonstrated that high levels of stress hormones including cortisol are associated with an alteration in plasma lipid profile.40

In this study, analysis of 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 and rs846910 SNPs showed a positive association of 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 and rs846910 gene polymorphisms with both AV and STs. The frequency of 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 TG and rs846910 GA polymorphic genotypes, as well as their T and A alleles, respectively, were significantly higher in patients with AV and STs than their matched peers.

Parallel to our findings, a significant positive association was reported between 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 gene polymorphism and PCOS, the common insulin-resistant disorder.12,41 Based on these results, we can conclude the direct relation between 11β-HSD1 rs12086634 TG and rs846910 GA polymorphic genotypes, and development of AV as well as STs. However, due to the novelty of our work on these specific polymorphisms, more studies on a larger number of patients are prerequisite to clarify this issue.

Regarding quantitative variables, the current study showed that, in AV and ST patients, rs846910 GA genotype demonstrated significant associations with elevated BMI, TC, LDL, and cortisol, and decreased HDL levels, however, rs12086634 GG genotype was significantly associated with increased BMI, TC, and LDL serum levels, and the number of STs and cortisol levels in ST cases only.

11β-HSD1 is responsible for the conversion of cortisone to its metabolically active form cortisol that activates glucocorticoid receptors.8 An imbalance in the cortisol level is associated with hyperlipidemia, increased visceral fat and insulin resistance, all of which are related to MeTS, a state resembling Cushing’s syndrome.11 There is a significant body of data suggesting an important functional role of 11β-HSD1 in the metabolic processes. In 11β-HSD1 transgenic mouse (a model of MeTS) showed dyslipidemia, but in 11β-HSD1 knockout animals, normal lipid profiles were found.15 Moreover, 11β-HSD1gene polymorphisms influence lipid levels to develop MeTS.42

Our reported positive associations of 11β-HSD1 rs846910 GA and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms with the reported high BMI and atherogenic lipid profile in investigated AV and ST patients were more impressive, and support the role of increased activity of 11β-HSD1 (cortisone to cortisol conversion), in the form of increased cortisol serum levels which were demonstrated in the current work, and showed significant positive association with STs and AV disease severity.

Therefore, we could suggest that 11β-HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms participate in AV and ST pathogenesis through increasing its transcriptional activity as shown by a high cortisol level which has a role in the phenotypic appearance of both diseases denoted by its association with disease severity.

Although some authors suggested that11β-HSD1 polymorphic variants are not associated with MetS and obesity,43,44 that could be attributed to the ethnic difference in the population studied,12 as many researchers support our findings. They have reported a significant positive relationship between rs12086634 gene polymorphisms and MeTS in different populations.11,13–16 Moreover, rs12086634 (an intronic variant) acts as an intronic enhancer,42 that enhances conversion of inactive cortisone to its active form (cortisol) as our study showed. Furthermore, 11β-HSD1 inhibitors were shown to be effective in the treatment of different features of MetS, promoting weight loss and reducing hyperglycemia plus improving insulin resistance.45

Conclusion

11β-HSD1 rs846910 and rs12086634 gene polymorphisms may contribute in AV and ST pathogenesis in the Egyptian population, and may be mediated through enhancing its enzymatic activity and increased cortisol levels. We confirmed that AV and STs are associated with obesity and atherogenic lipid profile. Diagnosis of AV and STs may play a role in early detection of MeTS, and patients having these diseases need suitable interventions such as weight reduction and dietary habits.