Literature DB >> 30773549

[Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with connective tissue graft for the treatment of Miller classI and II gingival recession].

K A Fan1, J S Zhong1, X Y Ouyang1, Y Xie1, Z Y Chen1, S Y Zhou1, Y Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of Miller classes I and II localized gingival recession.
METHODS: Ten patients with 10 Miller classes I and II localized gingival recessions were enrolled in the study. All defects were equal to or above 2 mm in recession depth. All the patients received treatment with VISTA+CTG. Their clinical parameters, including recession depth (Rec), recession width (RW), keratinized tissue width (KT), clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing depth (PD) were recorded and compared before surgery and 6 months later. The mean root coverage (MRC) and complete root coverage (CRC) were calculated at the end of 6 months. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to estimate the patients' discomfort during the operation and during the 2 weeks post-operation. Patient-based aesthetic satisfaction 6 months after surgery was evaluated by a VAS.
RESULTS: The mean Rec was (2.65±0.82) mm at baseline, and (0.35±0.58) mm after 6 months. The VISTA+CTG treatment resulted in an improvement of (2.30±0.98) mm in recession depth (P<0.001). MRC was 86.67%±21.94% and CRC reached 70% at the end of 6 months. KT increased (0.90±1.22) mm (P<0.05). Aesthetic satisfaction on the patients' level was 8.30 based on VAS (0=unsatisfied, 10=extremely satisfied). The patients' discomfort during the operation and 2 weeks post operation were 2.40 and 4.30 (0=no pain, 10=extreme pain). Furthermore, clinical outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the gingival biotypes, and between the teeth positioned in maxillary and in mandibular.
CONCLUSION: VISTA+CTG could be an effective treatment for Miller classes I and II localized gingival recession. Clinical outcomes indicated decrease in recession depth and width, and increase in width of keratinized tissue. Patients suffered little pain during the operation and 2 weeks post-operation of healing and accessed good aesthetic satisfaction. VISTA+CTG could be an option for the treatment of Miller classes I and II localized gingival recession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30773549      PMCID: PMC7433540          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  26 in total

1.  Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB.

Authors:  Homayoun H Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Covering of gingival recessions with a modified microsurgical tunnel technique: case report.

Authors:  Otto Zuhr; Stefan Fickl; Hannes Wachtel; Wolfgang Bolz; Markus B Hürzeler
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Authors:  Leandro Chambrone; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Coronally advanced flap with and without vertical releasing incisions for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  G Zucchelli; M Mele; C Mazzotti; M Marzadori; L Montebugnoli; M De Sanctis
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts.

Authors:  K Jepsen; B Heinz; J H Halben; S Jepsen
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Clinical results.

Authors:  A L Allen
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans.

Authors:  Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Kiyotaka Umezu; John C Kois
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Tunnel technique versus coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Authors:  Ilknur Ozenci; Sebnem Dirikan Ipci; Gokser Cakar; Selcuk Yilmaz
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 9.  Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Cairo; Michele Nieri; Umberto Pagliaro
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Treatment of multiple gingival recessions with vista technique: A case series.

Authors:  Anirban Chatterjee; Ena Sharma; Gayatri Gundanavar; Shobha Krishna Subbaiah
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with platelet-rich fibrin and connective tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Shashikanth Hegde; Jyosthna Ganapathi Madhurkar; Rajesh Kashyap; Maiya S Arun Kumar; Vinita Boloor
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-05-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.