Literature DB >> 30773546

[Twoyear outcomes and the influence factors of indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a retrospective study].

W Z You1, G L Dou1, B Xia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and to find out the influence factors of indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth.
METHODS: Children who received indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry in Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from August, 2014 to September, 2016 were collected in the Electronic Medical Record Database of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, via the database for scientific research provided by the corporation of Kaientai. The children selected as the subjects of this study were followed up over 1.5 years, and they were under 9 years old if in the group of primary molars while the children in the group of primary anterior teeth were under 4 and a half years old. Those children who were not reviewed regularly or didn't have complete medical records were removed. Basic information, the relevant medical records and radiographic records of those children were collected. All teeth were examined clinically and classified into 2 outcomes, teeth in group H were regarded as succeeded, and teeth in group P were regarded as failed. Survival analysis was applied. The survival rate and survival time of the deciduous teeth calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed by using Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: One hundred and six children were finally included, aged from 1.6 to 8.8 years, with the mean age of (5.0±1.7) years. 168 primary teeth (122 primary molars, 46 primary anterior teeth) were included, and the average follow up time was (729±244) days. Thirty-five primary teeth (23 primary molars, 12 primary anterior teeth) failed upon clinical or radiographic examinations by September, 2018. The cumulative survival probability of half a year, one year, one year and a half, two years, two and a half years for the indirect pulp treatment was 93.5%, 92.9%, 87.5%, 82.7%, and 75.5% through the KaplanMeier method, respectively. Through the analysis of Cox proportional hazard model, in primary molars, the survival probability tended to be lower when the number of tooth surface affected by caries was greater (OR=1.709, P<0.05). Compared with primary molars, the survival probability of primary anterior teeth was lower, but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Complying the current instructions in our department, the cumulative survival probability of two and a half years after the indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth was 75.5%. In primary molars, the survival probability tended to be lower when the number of tooth surfaces affected by caries increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30773546      PMCID: PMC7433554          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  18 in total

1.  Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.

Authors:  Caline A Falster; Fernando B Araujo; Lloyd H Straffon; Jacques E Nör
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

2.  Indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: 4-year results.

Authors:  Luciano Casagrande; Letícia Westphalen Bento; Débora Martini Dalpian; Franklin García-Godoy; Fernando Borba de Araujo
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of adhesive pulp capping in primary molars following hemostasis with 1.25% sodium hypochlorite: 2-year results.

Authors:  Tahsin Demir; Zafer C Cehreli
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date?

Authors:  James A Coll
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 5.  Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014.

Authors:  William F Waggoner
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.874

6.  Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.874

Review 7.  Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: A critical review on the current status of extended release formulations.

Authors:  Tahereh Mohammadi Hafshejani; Ali Zamanian; Jayarama Reddy Venugopal; Zahra Rezvani; Farshid Sefat; Mohammad Reza Saeb; Henri Vahabi; Payam Zarrintaj; Masoud Mozafari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal.

Authors:  F Schwendicke; J E Frencken; L Bjørndal; M Maltz; D J Manton; D Ricketts; K Van Landuyt; A Banerjee; G Campus; S Doméjean; M Fontana; S Leal; E Lo; V Machiulskiene; A Schulte; C Splieth; A F Zandona; N P T Innes
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2016-05

9.  [Two-year outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate: a retrospective study].

Authors:  G L Dou; N Wu; S Y Zhao; B Xia
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2018-02-18

10.  Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Renata Franzon; Lizandra F Guimarães; Camila E Magalhães; Alex N Haas; Fernando B Araujo
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.