Literature DB >> 30773057

CT Analysis of the Posteromedial Fragment of the Posterior Malleolar Fracture.

Amir Reza Vosoughi1, Malwattage Lara Tania Jayatilaka2, Benjamin Fischer2, Andrew P Molloy2, Lyndon W Mason2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no studies describing the characteristics of posteromedial fragment in the posterior malleolus fracture. The aim was to investigate the variability of posteromedial fracture fragments to enable better surgical planning.
METHODS: All Mason and Molloy type 2B fractures, defined as fracture of both the posterolateral and the posteromedial fragments of the posterior malleolus, from our database were identified to analyze the preoperative computed tomography scan. The posteromedial fragment was investigated in 47 cases (mean age, 46.6 years; 11 male, 36 female).
RESULTS: Morphologically, the fracture could be divided into 2 subtypes: (1) a large pilon intra-articular fragment (mean of X axis: 33.0 mm, Y: 30.7 mm, Z: 31.7 mm) presented in 29 cases with mean interfragmentary angle of 32.1 and back of tibia angle of 32.7 degrees (this was seen in 25 of 27 cases with supination injury pattern); and (2) a small extra-articular avulsion fragment (mean of X axis: 9.6 mm, Y: 13.2 mm, Z: 11.5 mm) present in 18 cases with a mean interfragmentary angle of 11.0 and back of tibia angle of 10.1 degrees. It was seen in 80% of pronation injuries.
CONCLUSION: The avulsion type of the posteromedial fragment of posterior malleolus fracture was more common in pronation injuries, likely the result of traction by the intermalleolar ligament, and the pilon type was more common in supination injuries, likely the result of the rotating talus impaction. Because of the intra-articular involvement, we believe the pilon type should undergo fixation to achieve articular congruity, unlike the avulsion type which may only function as a secondary syndesmotic stabilizer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lauge-Hansen; ankle; classification; fracture; posterior malleolus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30773057     DOI: 10.1177/1071100719830999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ankle stability in ankle fracture.

Authors:  Laura-Ann Lambert; Luke Falconer; Lyndon Mason
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-28

2.  [Established classification systems of posterior malleolar fractures : A systematic literature review].

Authors:  Elena Müller; Julia Terstegen; Holger Kleinertz; Hanneke Weel; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Alexej Barg; Carsten Schlickewei
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Operative strategy for tri-malleolar ankle fractures with posteromedial plafond involvement: a review of sixty six cases.

Authors:  Jun Young Choi; Hyoung Keun Oh; Lorenzo Di Mento; Jae Won Hur; Jin Soo Suh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Effect Evaluation of Perioperative Fast-Track Surgery Nursing for Tibial Fracture Patients with Computerized Tomography Images under Intelligent Algorithm.

Authors:  Mengmeng Zhang; Chuanbo Li; Fulan Rao
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.009

Review 5.  Advantages of preoperative planning using computed tomography scan for treatment of malleolar ankle fractures.

Authors:  Luigi Tarallo; Gian Mario Micheloni; Michele Mazzi; Arturo Rebeccato; Michele Novi; Fabio Catani
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-18

6.  Mechanism of posterior malleolar fracture of the ankle: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Naoki Haraguchi; Robert S Armiger
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-04-23

7.  Morphological analysis of posterior malleolar fractures with intra-articular impacted fragment in computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Wenyong Xie; Hao Lu; Hailin Xu; Yuan Quan; Yijun Liu; Zhongguo Fu; Dianying Zhang; Baoguo Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-12-10

8.  Evaluation of Ankle Fractures in 228 Patients From a Single Center Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping.

Authors:  Jianshuang Zeng; Cheng Xu; Gaoxiang Xu; Wupeng Zhang; Daofeng Wang; Hua Li; Xuewen Gan; Ying Xiong; Jiantao Li; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Traditional Approach vs Posterior Approach for Ankle Fractures Involving the Posterior Malleolus.

Authors:  Kristian Pilskog; Teresa Brnic Gote; Heid Elin Johannessen Odland; Knut Andreas Fjeldsgaard; Håvard Dale; Eivind Inderhaug; Jonas Meling Fevang
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.827

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.