Literature DB >> 30772768

NFAT1 Hypermethylation Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Activating ITGA6 Transcription.

Jian Zhang1, Zi-Qi Zheng2, Ya-Wei Yuan3, Pan-Pan Zhang2, Ying-Qin Li2, Ya-Qin Wang2, Xin-Ran Tang2, Xin Wen2, Xiao-Hong Hong2, Yuan Lei2, Qing-Mei He2, Xiao-Jing Yang2, Ying Sun2, Jun Ma2, Na Liu4.   

Abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic change in carcinogenesis. However, the function and mechanism of DNA methylation dysregulation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is still largely unclear. Our previous genome-wide microarray data showed that NFAT1 is one of the most hypermethylated transcription factor genes in NPC tissues. Here, we found that NFAT1 hypermethylation contributes to its down-regulation in NPC. NFAT1 overexpression inhibited cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in vitro and tumor metastasis in vivo. We further established that the tumor suppressor effect of NFAT1 is mediated by its inactivation of ITGA6 transcription. Our findings suggest the significance of activating NFAT1/ITGA6 signaling in aggressive NPC, defining a novel critical signaling mechanism that drives NPC invasion and metastasis and providing a novel target for future personalized therapy.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30772768      PMCID: PMC6378632          DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor with the highest incidence rate in Southern China and Southeast Asia [1], [2], [3]. Recent advances in intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the application of chemoradiotherapy have greatly improved prognosis, but approximately 30% of NPC patients eventually develop recurrence and/or distant metastasis [4]. Therefore, better understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate NPC metastasis is essential for the development of novel treatment strategies for NPC patients. Epigenetic modification, including DNA methylation, can change gene expression without altering nucleotide sequence. Aberrant DNA methylation plays a vital role in carcinogenesis and progression of cancers, and its dynamic nature and reversible changes make it a meritorious target for cancer treatment [5], [6]. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that hypermethylation in the promoter region of genes is a major mechanism involved in the inactivation or silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in various cancers [7], [8], [9], [10]. It has also been reported that promoter hypermethylation of TSGs is a common event in NPC [11], [12]. Dai et al. found that almost 91% of differentially methylated CpG sites in NPC were hypermethylated [13]. These findings suggest that TSG hypermethylation may play critical roles in NPC development and progression, and further studies are warranted to elucidate their functions and mechanisms. Our previous genome-wide methylation study identified nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT1) as one of the top-ranked hypermethylated transcription factor genes in NPC [14]. NFAT1, also known as NFATc2/NFATp, can modulate cellular transformation by regulating the expression of cell cycle-related proteins [15], [16], [17] and can play a tumor-suppressor role by reversing the transformed phenotype of neoplastic cells [18], [19], [20]. However, the role and mechanism of NFAT1 remains unclear in NPC. In this study, we demonstrate that promoter hypermethylation of NFAT1 contributes to its down-regulation in NPC, thereby promoting NPC cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis by activating the transcription of integrin subunit alpha 6 (ITGA6). Our findings reveal the role of NFAT1/ITGA6 signaling in NPC, providing novel therapeutic targets for individualized NPC therapy.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Clinical Specimens

Human NPC cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco). Normal human nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2-Tert) were grown in Keratinocyte Serum Free Medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). HEK-293 T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS. Nasopharyngeal epithelial and NPC cell lines were treated with or without 10 μmol/L 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC; Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h, with the drug/media replaced every 24 h. Twenty-seven freshly-frozen NPC and 23 normal nasopharyngeal epithelium tissue samples were collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. This study was authorized by the Institutional Ethical Review Boards of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, and written informed consents were provided by all patients for use of their biopsy tissue samples.

Plasmids, Virus Production, and Transfection

The pSin-EF2-puro-NFAT1-HA or pSin-EF2-puro-vector plasmids were obtained from Land Hua Gene Biosciences. pEnter-ITGA6-HIS and pEnter-vector plasmids were obtained from Vigene Bioscience. The short hairpin RNA targeting NFAT1 (shNFAT1) (Table S1) was synthesized and then cloned into pLKO.1-puromycin-GFP. For transient transfection, plasmids (2 μg) were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) and then harvested for assays 48 h after transfection. To generate stably transfected cell lines, lentivirus assembly expression plasmids were co-transfected into 293 T cells. Virus-containing supernatants were used to infect NPC cells for 48 h, and stable clones were selected using 0.5 μg/ml puromycin. The transduction efficiency was validated using RT-PCR and Western blot assays.

DNA Isolation and Bisulfite Pyrosequencing Analysis

DNA from NPC tissues or cell lines was isolated using the AllPrep RNA/DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) or EZ1 DNA Tissue Kit (Qiagen), and 1–2 μg DNA was then treated with sodium bisulfite using the EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bisulfite pyrosequencing primers are shown in Table S1. The PyroMark Q96 System (Qiagen) was used for the sequencing reactions and methylation level quantification.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR

Total RNA from NPC cell lines and tissues was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) as instructed. cDNA was synthesized using a Reverse Transcription Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Quantitative analysis was performed using SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Master Mix Kit (Invitrogen). The experiments were performed in triplicate for each sample and normalized to expression of the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The analysis was calculated by relative quantification (2-ΔΔCT). The primer sequences are shown in Table S1.

Western Blot

Total protein was extracted using RIPA buffer, and then quantified using Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MD). The membranes were then blocked with 5% skim milk and incubated with anti-NFAT1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-ITGA6 (1:500, Proteintech, Chicago, USA), anti-E-cadherin (1:500, BD Biosciences), anti-Vimentin (1:500, BD Biosciences), or anti-α-tubulin (1:1000, Proteintech) primary antibody overnight at 4°C. The species-matched secondary antibodies were then incubated at room temperature for 1 hour and the proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific).

Wound Healing Assay

Cells were seeded onto 6-well culture plates and cultured to a subconfluent state in complete medium. After 24 h starvation in serum-free medium, cell monolayers were linearly scraped with a P-200 pipette tip. Cells that had detached from the bottom of the wells were gently aspirated and the remaining cells were incubated in serum-free medium. The width of the scratch was monitored under a microscope and quantified in terms of the difference between the original width of the wound and the width after cell migration.

Migration and Invasion Assays

Transwell plates (8-μm pores) (Costar/Corning, Lowell, MA) were used for the Transwell migration or invasion assays. 5 × 104 or 1 × 105 cells resuspended in serum-free medium were placed in the upper chamber of each insert, either uncoated or coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences). The lower chamber contained culture medium with 10% FBS to act as a chemoattractant. The cells were incubated for 12 h or 24 h, and were then fixed and stained. Cells on the undersides of the filters were observed and counted under 200× magnification.

Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation Assays

For the CCK-8 assay, cells (1 × 103) were seeded into 96-well plates, incubated for 0–4 days, stained with 10 μl CCK-8 (Dojindo, Japan), and incubated for 2 h. Afterwards, absorbance at 450 nm was measured. For the colony formation assay, cells (0.3 × 103) were seeded into 6-well plates, cultured for 1 or 2 weeks, and the colonies then fixed in methanol, stained with crystal violet, and counted.

GSEA Analysis

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed as previously described [2]. A microarray dataset (GSE12452) deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was applied to identify the association of NFAT1 expression with EMT gene signature.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously [21]. Briefly, cells were fixed and incubated with the primary antibodies E-cadherin (610,181, 1:500, BD Biosciences) or Vimentin (610,193, 1:500, BD Biosciences) overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, cells were then incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen). Images were captured after staining with DAPI solution.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays

An EZ-Magna ChIP kit (Millipore, Billerica, MD) was used to perform the ChIP assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, cells were harvested for cross-linking and sheared by sonication. The resultant chromatin fraction was immunoprecipitated using anti-HA (Abcam, ab9110) or negative control anti-IgG (Sigma) antibody. The DNA fragments were subsequently isolated using Qiagen MinElute column purification. 1 μg of ChIP DNA was used for ChIP-seq library preparation using Mondrian and directed to 50 bp sequencing using HiSeq 2500 (The Beijing Genomics Institute, China). ChIP quantitative PCR was performed using specific primers (GENEWIZ, China) (Table S1).

Luciferase Reporter Assays

pGL3 luciferase reporter plasmids containing wild type or mutant promoter of ITGA6 were constructed. Cells were co-transfected with the indicated luciferase reporters (200 ng) and a pRL construct containing the Renilla luciferase reporter (1 ng), as well as NFAT1 overexpression plasmid or empty vector (2 μg). After 36 h, luciferase activity was measured using the Dual luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega). The value of firefly luciferase activity was normalized to the Renilla activity.

Popliteal Lymph Node Metastasis Model

All animal research protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Twenty female BALB/c nude mice (4–5-weeks-old) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Beijing, China). Cells (3 × 105 in 0.1 mL of sterilized PBS) stably overexpressing NFAT1 or vector were inoculated into the footpads of mice (n = 10/group). The mice were sacrificed on day 28, and the primary tumors and popliteal lymph nodes were detached and paraffin-embedded. Then, sections of the primary tumors and lymph nodes were subjected to H&E staining for histological examination. Metastatic tumor cells in the lymph nodes were identified with an anti-pan-cytokeratin antibody (Thermo Scientific) and the images were captured using a NIKON ECLIPSE 80i microscope (Japan).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Sections of primary tumors and popliteal lymph nodes were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated with a descending ethanol gradient. After treatment with citrate buffer, the sections were pre-incubated with hydrogen peroxide, blocked with goat serum, incubated with primary antibodies (NFAT1, 1:100; ITGA6, 1:100; E-cadherin, 1:100; Vimentin, 1:100), and then labeled with an avidin–biotin peroxidase complex (Dako) followed by diaminobenzidine development (Sigma). Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and images were captured using a NIKON ECLIPSE 80i microscope (Japan).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc.). Student's t-test (two-tailed) was used to compare means between two groups. All bars represent mean ± SD derived from three independent experiments. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. All data from this study has been deposited at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center for future reference (number RDDB2018000416).

Results

The NFAT1 Promoter is Hypermethylated in NPC

Our previous genome-wide methylation microarray (GSE52068) showed that NFAT1 is one of the top-ranked hypermethylated transcription factor genes in NPC tissues, which was also identified in the Hong Kong dataset (GSE62336) (Figure S1). We validated the promoter methylation level of NFAT1 by bisulfite pyrosequencing in independent NPC (n = 8) and normal tissues (n = 8). The CpG islands and region selected for bisulfite pyrosequencing in the NFAT1 promoter region are shown in Figure 1A. The methylation level of NFAT1 (cg13844474) in NPC tissues was significantly increased compared with normal tissues (Figure 1, B and C). Similarly, in NPC cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B), the methylation level of NFAT1 (cg13844474) was higher than that in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) (Figures 1D, S2). These results indicate that the NFAT1 promoter is hypermethylated in NPC.
Figure S1

NFAT1 is hypermethylated in NPC. (A, B) Methylation level of one CpG site (cg13844474) in the promoter region of NFAT1 based on previous genome-wide methylation microarray data (accession number GSE52068 and GSE62336). Data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test.

Figure 1

The NFAT1 promoter is hypermethylated in NPC. (A) Schematic illustration of the NFAT1 promoter CpG islands and bisulfite pyrosequencing region. TSS: transcription start site; cg13844474: CG site identified in our previous genome-wide methylation analysis; red text: CG sites for bisulfite pyrosequencing; bold red text: most significantly altered CG site in NFAT1. (B, C) Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of the NFAT1 promoter region (B) and the average methylation levels (C) in normal (n = 8) and NPC (n = 8) tissues. Red text: cg13844474 CG site. (D) Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of NFAT1 promoter region, as determined by bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis, in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and NPC (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) cell lines.

Figure S2

NFAT1 promoter is hypermethylated in NPC cell lines. Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of the NFAT1 promoter region in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) with or without DAC treatment.

The NFAT1 promoter is hypermethylated in NPC. (A) Schematic illustration of the NFAT1 promoter CpG islands and bisulfite pyrosequencing region. TSS: transcription start site; cg13844474: CG site identified in our previous genome-wide methylation analysis; red text: CG sites for bisulfite pyrosequencing; bold red text: most significantly altered CG site in NFAT1. (B, C) Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of the NFAT1 promoter region (B) and the average methylation levels (C) in normal (n = 8) and NPC (n = 8) tissues. Red text: cg13844474 CG site. (D) Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of NFAT1 promoter region, as determined by bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis, in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and NPC (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) cell lines.

NFAT1 Down-Regulation is Associated With Its Promoter Hypermethylation

To understand the relationship between NFAT1 expression and its promoter methylation status in NPC, we performed quantitative RT-PCR and found that NFAT1 mRNA was significantly down-regulated in NPC cell lines and tissues, especially in those with lymph node metastasis (Figure 2, A–C). Furthermore, Western blot showed NFAT1 protein expression was down-regulated in both NPC cell lines and tissues (Figure 2, D and E). To determine whether the down-regulation of NFAT1 results from its promoter hypermethylation, we treated immortalized normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines and NPC cell lines with or without DAC. Bisulfite pyrosequencing and quantitative RT-PCR showed that NFAT1 methylation levels were substantially decreased while NFAT1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in NPC cell lines but not in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (Figures 2, F and G, S2; P < .05). These findings suggest that NFAT1 is down-regulated in NPC and that its down-regulation is associated with its promoter hypermethylation.
Figure 2

NFAT1 promoter hypermethylation contributes to its down-regulation in NPC. (A, B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of NFAT1 mRNA expression in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and NPC cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) (A), together with normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissues (n = 10) and NPC tissues (n = 14) (B). (C) Relative expression of NFAT1 in NPC patients without (n = 5) or with (n = 9) lymph node metastasis. (D, E) Western blot analysis of NFAT1 protein in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines and NPC cell lines (D), normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissues (N, n = 5), and NPC tissues (T, n = 5) (E). (F, G) NFAT1 methylation levels were measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis (F) and relative NFAT1 mRNA levels were measured by real-time RT–PCR (G) with (DAC+) or without (DAC−) DAC treatment in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines and NPC cell lines. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test.

NFAT1 promoter hypermethylation contributes to its down-regulation in NPC. (A, B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of NFAT1 mRNA expression in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and NPC cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) (A), together with normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissues (n = 10) and NPC tissues (n = 14) (B). (C) Relative expression of NFAT1 in NPC patients without (n = 5) or with (n = 9) lymph node metastasis. (D, E) Western blot analysis of NFAT1 protein in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines and NPC cell lines (D), normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissues (N, n = 5), and NPC tissues (T, n = 5) (E). (F, G) NFAT1 methylation levels were measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis (F) and relative NFAT1 mRNA levels were measured by real-time RT–PCR (G) with (DAC+) or without (DAC−) DAC treatment in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines and NPC cell lines. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test.

NFAT1 Inhibits NPC Cell Migration, Invasion, and EMT In Vitro

To investigate the role of NFAT1 in NPC malignancy, we subjected SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or the control vector to CCK8, colony formation, wound healing, and Transwell assays. Ectopic expression of NFAT1 significantly suppressed NPC cell migration (Figure 3, A and B) and invasion (Figure 3B). In contrast, silencing NFAT1 using two different shRNAs clearly increased the migratory and invasive abilities of NPC cells (Figures 3, C and D, S3, A-C). CCK8 and colony formation assays demonstrated that overexpression or silencing of NFAT1 had little effects on NPC cell viability and colony formation (Figure S3, D–G). GSEA analysis based on the GSE12452 database showed that NFAT1 was associated with EMT and hallmark apical junction (Figure 4A). Western blot and immunofluorescence staining showed that overexpression of NFAT1 was associated with increased expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and decreased expression of the mesenchymal marker Vimentin (Figure 4, B–D). Collectively, these findings indicate that NFAT1 suppresses NPC cell migration, invasion, and EMT in vitro.
Figure 3

NFAT1 inhibits NPC cell migration and invasion in vitro. (A) Wound healing assays in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector. (B) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. (C) Wound healing assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells transiently expressing control NC or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh-1 and sh-2). (D) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. Magnification ×200; scale bar, 100 μm. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are mean ± SD. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test.

Figure S3

NFAT1 has little effect on NPC cell proliferation in vitro. (A, B) NFAT1 protein expression after knockdown in SUNE1, HONE1, and 5-8F. (C) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel in 5-8F cells transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2). (D, E) CCK-8 assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (D) or transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2) (E). (F, G) A colony formation assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (F) or transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2) (G). All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test.

Figure 4

NFAT1 inhibits NPC cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro. (A) GSEA enrichment plots revealed that enrichment of apical junction pathways was associated with down-regulation of NFAT1. (B) Western blot analysis of EMT marker (E-cadherin and Vimentin) expression levels in SUNE1 and HONE1 stably overexpressing vector or NFAT1. (C, D) Immunofluorescence staining of E-cadherin (C) and Vimentin (D) in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells with NFAT1 overexpression (×400).

NFAT1 inhibits NPC cell migration and invasion in vitro. (A) Wound healing assays in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector. (B) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. (C) Wound healing assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells transiently expressing control NC or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh-1 and sh-2). (D) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. Magnification ×200; scale bar, 100 μm. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are mean ± SD. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test. NFAT1 inhibits NPC cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro. (A) GSEA enrichment plots revealed that enrichment of apical junction pathways was associated with down-regulation of NFAT1. (B) Western blot analysis of EMT marker (E-cadherin and Vimentin) expression levels in SUNE1 and HONE1 stably overexpressing vector or NFAT1. (C, D) Immunofluorescence staining of E-cadherin (C) and Vimentin (D) in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells with NFAT1 overexpression (×400).

NFAT1 Represses the Transcription of ITGA6 in NPC

To identify target genes of NFAT1, ChIP-Seq was performed using HA tag antibody. Sequence motif search of the NFAT1-binding peaks showed greatest enrichment for the consensus NFAT1 motif (GGAAA) (Figure 5A). The peak intensity profile of these sites flanking the TSS is shown in Figure 5B, and a conservation analysis showed that sequences within and flanking the NFAT1 binding sites are evolutionarily conserved. To further identify downstream target genes of NFAT1, we performed Gene Ontology analysis and selected 10 genes for validation that overlapped among proteoglycans in cancer, regulation of cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, and focal adhesion (Figure 5C). Quantitative RT-PCR showed that ITGA6 was among the most down-regulated genes associated with NFAT1 overexpression (Figure 5D). Correlation analysis further demonstrated that ITGA6 mRNA expression inversely correlated with NFAT1 mRNA expression in the GSE12452 database (Figure 5E; R = −0.357, P < .05).
Figure 5

NFAT1 represses ITGA6 transcription. (A) The top consensus sequence motif compiled from NFAT1-binding peaks centered on the binding summits. (B) The distribution of NFAT1 binding motif position relative to TSS. (C) Venn Diagram: Number of regulated genes in proteoglycans in cancer, regulation of cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, and focal adhesion. Note, 10 genes are commonly regulated in cancer and apical junction. (D) Validation of 10 differentially expressed genes by RT-PCR. (E) Correlations between NFAT1 mRNA expression and ITGA6 expression in GSE12452 dataset. (F) ChIP real-time PCR assays were conducted to assess the enrichment of NFAT1 in the ITGA6 promoter region in NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells. Data are means ± standard deviation. **P < .01 compared with IgG; Student's t-tests. (G) Wild type (Wt) or mutant (Mt) NFAT1 target sequence of the ITGA6 promoter. (H) Relative luciferase activity of the vector or NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells after transfection with Wt or Mt. ITGA6 promoter reporter genes. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test. (I) Western blot analysis of ITGA6 expression in the vector or NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells.

NFAT1 represses ITGA6 transcription. (A) The top consensus sequence motif compiled from NFAT1-binding peaks centered on the binding summits. (B) The distribution of NFAT1 binding motif position relative to TSS. (C) Venn Diagram: Number of regulated genes in proteoglycans in cancer, regulation of cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, and focal adhesion. Note, 10 genes are commonly regulated in cancer and apical junction. (D) Validation of 10 differentially expressed genes by RT-PCR. (E) Correlations between NFAT1 mRNA expression and ITGA6 expression in GSE12452 dataset. (F) ChIP real-time PCR assays were conducted to assess the enrichment of NFAT1 in the ITGA6 promoter region in NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells. Data are means ± standard deviation. **P < .01 compared with IgG; Student's t-tests. (G) Wild type (Wt) or mutant (Mt) NFAT1 target sequence of the ITGA6 promoter. (H) Relative luciferase activity of the vector or NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells after transfection with Wt or Mt. ITGA6 promoter reporter genes. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test. (I) Western blot analysis of ITGA6 expression in the vector or NFAT1 overexpressing NPC cells. ChIP real-time PCR assay using an anti-HA antibody confirmed that restoration of NFAT1 increased the occupancy of NFAT1 at the ITGA6 promoter region (Figure 5F). A luciferase reporter gene assay was performed to determine whether ITGA6 is a direct target of NFAT1. We cloned the wild type or mutant NFAT1 target sequences of the ITGA6 promoter into luciferase reporter vectors (Figure 5G). After co-transfection with NFAT1 plasmids, the luciferase activity of the ITGA6 reporter gene was significantly reduced, whereas the activity of the mutant reporter gene was not affected (Figure 5H), confirming that NFAT1 can bind to the ITGA6 promoter. Western blot further showed that overexpression of NFAT1 significantly reduced ITGA6 protein expression. Taken together, these findings suggest that NFAT1 can negatively regulate ITGA6 expression by repressing the transcription of ITGA6.

ITGA6 is a Functional Target of NFAT1 in NPC

To determine whether NFAT1-mediated ITGA6 down-regulation contributed to its inhibitory effect on NPC cell migration and invasion, we restored ITGA6 expression in NPC cells stably overexpressing NFAT1. Co-transfection with ITGA6 significantly abolished the inhibitory effects of NFAT1 on NPC cell migration and invasion (Figure 6, A–D). In addition, the expression level of E-cadherin induced by NFAT1 was substantially decreased, and Vimentin was clearly increased following co-transfection with ITGA6 (Figure 6, E and F). These findings demonstrate that ITGA6 is a functional target of NFAT1 in NPC cells.
Figure 6

ITGA6 is a functional target of NFAT1 in NPC. ITGA6 plasmid was transfected in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or the empty vector (V) (A, B) Wound healing assay. (C, D) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. (E, F) E-cadherin, Vimentin, ITGA6 and NFAT1 expression levels were measured via Western blot. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test.

ITGA6 is a functional target of NFAT1 in NPC. ITGA6 plasmid was transfected in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or the empty vector (V) (A, B) Wound healing assay. (C, D) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel. (E, F) E-cadherin, Vimentin, ITGA6 and NFAT1 expression levels were measured via Western blot. All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student's t-test.

NFAT1 Inhibits NPC Aggressiveness In Vivo

To determine whether NFAT1 affects NPC metastasis in vivo, we established a popliteal lymph node metastasis mouse model by inoculating the footpads of nude mice with HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or vector alone (Figure 7A). H&E staining showed that primary tumors in the NFAT1 overexpression group exhibited sharp edges that expanded as spheroids, indicating a less aggressive phenotype with invasion towards the skin and muscle (Figure 7B). Furthermore, the popliteal lymph node volumes were smaller, and pan-cytokeratin-positive tumor cells were fewer in the NFAT1 overexpression group than in the vector group (Figure 7, C–E). Taken together, these findings imply that NFAT1 suppresses NPC cell metastasis in vivo.
Figure 7

NFAT1 suppresses NPC aggressiveness in vivo. HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (n = 10 per group) were injected into the footpads of mice to construct inguinal lymph node metastasis models. (A) Representative images of primary footpad tumor and metastatic popliteal lymph node. (B) Representative images of microscopic primary tumors in the footpad stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Magnification ×200; scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Representative images and quantification of the average volumes of the popliteal lymph nodes. Mean ± standard deviation; **P < .01compared with vector; Student's t-test. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for pan-cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in popliteal lymph nodes (×4 and ×200). Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Metastatic ratios of popliteal lymph nodes; Chi-squared test. (F) Immunohistochemical staining for NFAT1, ITGA6, E-cadherin, and Vimentin in primary footpad tumors (×100 and ×200). Each mouse sample was considered as an independent experiment; three technological replicates were repeated in each sample.

NFAT1 suppresses NPC aggressiveness in vivo. HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (n = 10 per group) were injected into the footpads of mice to construct inguinal lymph node metastasis models. (A) Representative images of primary footpad tumor and metastatic popliteal lymph node. (B) Representative images of microscopic primary tumors in the footpad stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Magnification ×200; scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Representative images and quantification of the average volumes of the popliteal lymph nodes. Mean ± standard deviation; **P < .01compared with vector; Student's t-test. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for pan-cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in popliteal lymph nodes (×4 and ×200). Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Metastatic ratios of popliteal lymph nodes; Chi-squared test. (F) Immunohistochemical staining for NFAT1, ITGA6, E-cadherin, and Vimentin in primary footpad tumors (×100 and ×200). Each mouse sample was considered as an independent experiment; three technological replicates were repeated in each sample. To further examine whether NFAT1 suppresses ITGA6 expression in vivo, IHC was used to assess NFAT1 and ITGA6 protein levels in primary tumors. ITGA6 expression was significantly decreased in the NFAT1 overexpression group compared with the vector group (Figure 7F). In addition, overexpression of NFAT1 increased E-cadherin expression, but decreased Vimentin expression. In summary, these results suggest that NFAT1 up-regulation is associated with a reduction in ITGA6 expression in vivo.

Discussion

This study identified the novel role of NFAT1 in NPC progression. Our findings establish that NFAT1 down-regulation in NPC is associated with its promoter hypermethylation. Restoration of NFAT1 significantly suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. The tumor suppressor role of NFAT1 might depend on its transcriptional repression of ITGA6. Overall, our findings uncovered a novel mechanism by which NFAT regulates ITGA6 expression and its role in NPC progression. DNA methylation, one of the best characterized epigenetic alterations, can lead to long-term repression of gene expression [22]. Approximately sixty percent of genes have one or more CpG islands in their promoter and can therefore be potentially silenced by DNA methylation. DNA methylation patterns are largely modified in cancer cells and the alteration of DNA methylation patterns is a hallmark of cancer [23]. Numerous studies have found that repression of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) by DNA hypermethylation contributes to dysregulation of various cellular pathways (cell cycle, apoptosis, and metastasis) during carcinogenesis [24], [25], [26]. Our previous genome-wide methylation microarray study showed that DNA hypermethylation is frequent in NPC [14], and that NFAT1 was one of the most differentially hypermethylated transcriptional factor genes in NPC tissues. However, the function and mechanism of NFAT1 in NPC remained unclear. NFAT1, one member of the NFAT family, is a transcription factor that has profound effects on the proliferation and migration of T cells [27]. All NFAT family proteins share a highly conserved Rel-homology domain (RHD), which endows the NFAT members with a common DNA-binding specificity [28]. In addition, these calcium-responsive NFAT isoforms (NFAT1-NFAT4) have another conserved NFAT homology domain (NHD), which can bind to promoter elements and initiate gene transcription. Recent studies suggest that NFATs may be involved in many aspects of cancer, including cancer cell survival [29], [30], apoptosis [31], [32], [33], [34], migration and metastasis [35], [36], [37], angiogenesis [38], [39], [40], and the tumor microenvironment [41]. There is little knowledge regarding the role that NFAT1 plays in NPC. In this study, we demonstrated that NFAT1 is significantly down-regulated in NPC tissues and cell lines as a result of promoter hypermethylation. Overexpression of NFAT1 inhibited NPC cell migration, invasion, EMT, and metastasis, but had little influence on cell proliferation. Therefore, we conclude that NFAT1 acts as a tumor suppressor in NPC progression, a role which has also been described for NFAT1 in glioma [42]. It has been reported that NFAT1 functions as an oncogene in melanoma [43], indicating that NFAT1 exerts different functions in different tumor types. EMT is a normal physiological process during which epithelial cells acquire enhanced motility and invasiveness typical of mesenchymal cells. Recent studies suggest that multiple morphogenic and environmental signals, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), WNT, epidermal growth factors and platelet-derived growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, and integrin receptor ligands all promote EMT [2], [21], [44], [45]. After screening downstream NFAT1 targets, we found that expression of ITGA6 is the most significantly affected by NFAT1. Consistent with this observation, we found that NFAT1 could directly bind to the promoter region of ITGA6 and inhibit its transcription. ITGA6, an extracellular integrin receptor, could promote EMT and invasive and metastatic behavior in carcinoma progression [46], [47]. Restoration of normal ITGA6 levels in NPC cells via NFAT1 overexpression significantly reversed the inhibitory effects of NFAT1 on migration, invasion, and EMT, indicating that ITGA6 is a functional target of NFAT1 in NPC.

Conclusions

In summary, we report that NFAT1 is epigenetically silenced by promoter methylation in NPC. Epigenetic silencing of NFAT1 promotes EMT and metastasis in NPC by activating ITGA6 transcription. These findings underscore the significant role of NFAT1 as well as ITGA6 in NPC metastasis, and provide a specific target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for patients with metastatic NPC in the future. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary Table S1

Primers used in this study NFAT1 is hypermethylated in NPC. (A, B) Methylation level of one CpG site (cg13844474) in the promoter region of NFAT1 based on previous genome-wide methylation microarray data (accession number GSE52068 and GSE62336). Data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test. NFAT1 promoter is hypermethylated in NPC cell lines. Bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis of the NFAT1 promoter region in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and N2Tert) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines (CNE1, CNE2, SUNE1, HONE1, HNE1, 5-8F, and 6-10B) with or without DAC treatment. NFAT1 has little effect on NPC cell proliferation in vitro. (A, B) NFAT1 protein expression after knockdown in SUNE1, HONE1, and 5-8F. (C) Transwell migration and invasion assays with or without Matrigel in 5-8F cells transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2). (D, E) CCK-8 assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (D) or transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2) (E). (F, G) A colony formation assay in SUNE1 and HONE1 cells stably overexpressing NFAT1 or empty vector (F) or transfected with the negative control (NC) or NFAT1-shRNAs (sh1 and sh2) (G). All experiments were repeated at least three times; data are means ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test.

Author contributions

N.L. and J.Z. designed the research. J.Z., Z.Z., P.Z., and Y.L. conducted the experiments. J.Z., Y.Y., Y.W., X.T., X.W., X.H., Y.L., Y.S., and J.M. acquired and analyzed the data. N.L., J.M., Q.H., and X.Y. provided the reagents. J. Z. and N.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  47 in total

1.  NFAT1 Directly Regulates IL8 and MMP3 to Promote Melanoma Tumor Growth and Metastasis.

Authors:  Einav Shoshan; Russell R Braeuer; Takafumi Kamiya; Aaron K Mobley; Li Huang; Mayra E Vasquez; Guermarie Velazquez-Torres; Nitin Chakravarti; Cristina Ivan; Victor Prieto; Gabriel J Villares; Menashe Bar-Eli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Ascorbyl Stearate Promotes Apoptosis Through Intrinsic Mitochondrial Pathway in HeLa Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Shirish D Mane; Maikho Thoh; Deepak Sharma; Santosh K Sandur; K Akhilender Naidu
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  A similar DNA-binding motif in NFAT family proteins and the Rel homology region.

Authors:  J Jain; E Burgeon; T M Badalian; P G Hogan; A Rao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-02-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Extracellular matrix protein 1 promotes cell metastasis and glucose metabolism by inducing integrin β4/FAK/SOX2/HIF-1α signaling pathway in gastric cancer.

Authors:  L Gan; J Meng; M Xu; M Liu; Y Qi; C Tan; Y Wang; P Zhang; W Weng; W Sheng; M Huang; Z Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Activation of the NFAT-Calcium Signaling Pathway in Human Lamina Cribrosa Cells in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mustapha Irnaten; Alexander Zhdanov; Deirdre Brennan; Thomas Crotty; Abbot Clark; Dmitri Papkovsky; Colm O'Brien
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Quercetin inhibits angiogenesis by targeting calcineurin in the xenograft model of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Qiuting Wang; Shijun Yang; Chen Chen; Xiaoya Li; Jinyu Liu; Zhongmei Zou; Dayong Cai
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors prevent activation-induced cell death and promote anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  K Cao; G Wang; W Li; L Zhang; R Wang; Y Huang; L Du; J Jiang; C Wu; X He; A I Roberts; F Li; A B Rabson; Y Wang; Y Shi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  The prevalence and prevention of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.

Authors:  Su-Mei Cao; Malcolm J Simons; Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-02

Review 9.  Signal Transduction Pathways of EMT Induced by TGF-β, SHH, and WNT and Their Crosstalks.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhang; Xiao-Jun Tian; Jianhua Xing
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Epigenetic mediated zinc finger protein 671 downregulation promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by inhibiting cell cycle arrest.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Xin Wen; Na Liu; Ying-Qin Li; Xin-Ran Tang; Ya-Qin Wang; Qing-Mei He; Xiao-Jing Yang; Pan-Pan Zhang; Jun Ma; Ying Sun
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-19
View more
  3 in total

1.  Differential Expression and Alternative Splicing of Transcripts Associated With Cisplatin-Induced Chemoresistance in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Huali Jiang; Tao Xie; Jieling Zheng; Yunhong Tian; Rong Li; Baiyao Wang; Jie Lin; Anan Xu; Xiaoting Huang; Yawei Yuan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D gene promotes radiosensitivity via STAT3 dephosphorylation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanling Lin; Xiaohan Zhou; Kaifan Yang; Yuting Chen; Lingzhi Wang; Wenxiao Luo; Yujiang Li; Jinrong Liao; Yingtong Zhou; Yiming Lei; Yanting Zhang; Dehua Wu; Longmei Cai
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  High-throughput chromosome conformation capture-based analysis of higher-order chromatin structure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Yang; Mingfa Chen; Lingjun Cheng; Canping Su; Xiyi Liao; Hongzhang He; Mingming You; Gang Rui; Guolin Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.