Pamela Ann Koch1, Isobel R Contento2, Heewon L Gray3, Marissa Burgermaster4, Lorraine Bandelli2, Emily Abrams2, Jennifer Di Noia5. 1. Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: pak14@tc.columbia.edu. 2. Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. 3. College of Public Health, University of South Florida, FL. 4. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Department of Population Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. 5. William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Food, Health, & Choices, two 10-month interventions. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized, controlled study with 4 groups: curriculum, wellness, curriculum plus wellness, and control. SETTING:Twenty elementary schools (5/group) in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Fifth-grade students (n = 1,159). At baseline, 44.6% were at the ≥85th body mass index (BMI) percentile for age and 86% qualified for free or reduced-price lunch. INTERVENTION: Curriculum was 23 science lessons based on social cognitive and self-determination theories, replacing 2 mandated units. Wellness was classroom food policy and physical activity bouts of Dance Breaks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For obesity, age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles were used (anthropometric measures). The researchers also employed 6 energy balance-related behaviors and 8 theory-based determinants of behavior change (by questionnaire). ANALYSIS: Pairwise adjusted odds in hierarchical logistic regression models were determined for >85th BMI percentile. Behaviors and theory-based determinants were examined in a 2-level hierarchical linear model with a 2 × 2 design for intervention effects and interactions. RESULTS: Obesity showed no change. For behaviors, there was a negative curriculum intervention change in physical activity (P = .04). The wellness intervention resulted in positive changes for sweetened beverages frequency (P = .05) and size (P = .006); processed packaged snacks size (P = .01); candy frequency (P = .04); baked good frequency (P = .05); and fast food frequency (P = .003), size (P = .01), and combo meals (P = .002). Theory-based determinants demonstrated no change. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of the lack of a decrease in obesity, behavior changes only for the wellness intervention, and no changes in theory-based determinants warrant further research.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Food, Health, & Choices, two 10-month interventions. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized, controlled study with 4 groups: curriculum, wellness, curriculum plus wellness, and control. SETTING: Twenty elementary schools (5/group) in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Fifth-grade students (n = 1,159). At baseline, 44.6% were at the ≥85th body mass index (BMI) percentile for age and 86% qualified for free or reduced-price lunch. INTERVENTION: Curriculum was 23 science lessons based on social cognitive and self-determination theories, replacing 2 mandated units. Wellness was classroom food policy and physical activity bouts of Dance Breaks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For obesity, age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles were used (anthropometric measures). The researchers also employed 6 energy balance-related behaviors and 8 theory-based determinants of behavior change (by questionnaire). ANALYSIS: Pairwise adjusted odds in hierarchical logistic regression models were determined for >85th BMI percentile. Behaviors and theory-based determinants were examined in a 2-level hierarchical linear model with a 2 × 2 design for intervention effects and interactions. RESULTS:Obesity showed no change. For behaviors, there was a negative curriculum intervention change in physical activity (P = .04). The wellness intervention resulted in positive changes for sweetened beverages frequency (P = .05) and size (P = .006); processed packaged snacks size (P = .01); candy frequency (P = .04); baked good frequency (P = .05); and fast food frequency (P = .003), size (P = .01), and combo meals (P = .002). Theory-based determinants demonstrated no change. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of the lack of a decrease in obesity, behavior changes only for the wellness intervention, and no changes in theory-based determinants warrant further research.