Literature DB >> 30771737

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficAcy and safety of Trimetazidine in patients with angina pectoris having been treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (ATPCI study): Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.

Roberto Ferrari1, Ian Ford2, Kim Fox3, Mario Marzilli4, Michal Tendera5, Petr Widimský6, Jean-Pascal Challeton7, Nicolas Danchin8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: About 30% of angina patients have persisting symptoms despite successful revascularization and antianginal therapy. Moreover, in stable patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not improve survival as compared with medical therapy alone. Trimetazidine, an antianginal agent devoid of hemodynamic effect, may help reducing symptoms and improving outcomes after PCI. The ATPCI study is investigating the efficacy and safety of adding trimetazidine to standard-of-care in angina patients who had a recent PCI.
METHODS: ATPCI is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, event-driven study in patients with coronary artery disease having undergone PCI because of stable angina (elective PCI) or unstable angina/NSTEMI (urgent PCI). After PCI, patients were randomized to trimetazidine (35 mg bid) or placebo on top of standard-of-care including event prevention drugs and antianginal treatment. Patients will be followed for 2 to 4 years. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of cardiac death, hospitalization for a cardiac event and recurrence or persistence of angina. Safety events related to trimetazidine use will be monitored.
RESULTS: Recruitment lasted from September 2014 to June 2016. A total of 6007 patients were enrolled (58% and 42% after elective and urgent PCI, respectively). Mean age was 61 years, 77% were males, and median durations of coronary artery disease were 1 and 5 months (if urgent or elective PCI, respectively). Almost all patients received drugs for event prevention and antianginal therapy at baseline.
CONCLUSION: The ATPCI study will shed further light on the management of contemporary angina patients after PCI. Results are expected in 2019.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30771737     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Treating angina.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; S Censi; A Squeri
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.803

2.  Highlights from the European society of cardiology congress 2020.

Authors:  Pooneh Nabavizadeh; Dylan L Steen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Effect of trimetazidine on the functional capacity of ischemic heart disease patients not suitable for revascularization: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alyaa Ajabnoor; Amnah Mukhtar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Efficacy of INtensive Treatment vs. Standard Treatment of COmpound DanshEn Dripping Pills in Refractory Angina Patients With Incomplete Revascularization (INCODER Study): Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled, Superiority Trial.

Authors:  Zexuan Wu; Danping Xu; Zhen Wu; Ailan Chen; Lijuan Liu; Li Ling; Yan Zhou; Duoduo Liu; Yin Liu; Yugang Dong; Yili Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  Treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Hiroki Shimokawa; Colin Berry
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.081

Review 6.  Post-percutaneous coronary intervention angina: From physiopathological mechanisms to individualized treatment.

Authors:  Leonardo De Luca; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ilaria Spoletini
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.487

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.