Literature DB >> 30771704

Direct and indirect effects of perception on generalization gradients.

Jonas Zaman1, Eva Ceulemans2, Dirk Hermans3, Tom Beckers3.   

Abstract

For more than a century, researchers have attempted to understand why organisms behave similarly across situations. Despite the robust character of generalization, considerable variation in conditioned responding both between and within humans remains a challenge for contemporary generalization models. The current study aims to investigate the extent to which variation in behavior in a context of generalization can be attributed to differences in perception. We combined a fear conditioning and generalization procedure with a perceptual decision task in humans. We found that the failure to perceive a novel stimulus as different from the trained fear-evoking stimulus led to increased conditioned responding. Furthermore, perceptual errors yielded perceived stimulus-outcome contingencies that differed substantially from the objective contingencies. Final, the impact of a perceptual error was dependent upon these perceived contingencies. These findings suggest that generalization across a perceptual dimension is to a large extent driven by perceptual errors that directly affect behavior but also indirectly as they yield different learning experiences between individuals.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Conditioning; Fear generalization; Perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30771704     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Anastasia Chalkia; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Antoine Selim Bilgin; Tom Beckers; Bram Vervliet; Yannick Boddez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

2.  Perceptual errors are related to shifts in generalization of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Dieter Struyf; Eva Ceulemans; Bram Vervliet; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-24

3.  Probing the role of perception in fear generalization.

Authors:  J Zaman; D Struyf; E Ceulemans; T Beckers; B Vervliet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Social aversive generalization learning sharpens the tuning of visuocortical neurons to facial identity cues.

Authors:  Yannik Stegmann; Lea Ahrens; Paul Pauli; Andreas Keil; Matthias J Wieser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Individual differences in human fear generalization-pattern identification and implications for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Y Stegmann; M A Schiele; D Schümann; T B Lonsdorf; P Zwanzger; M Romanos; A Reif; K Domschke; J Deckert; M Gamer; P Pauli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Acute stress leaves fear generalization in healthy individuals intact.

Authors:  Franziska Magdalena Kausche; Gundula Zerbes; Lea Kampermann; Jana Christina Müller; Klaus Wiedemann; Christian Büchel; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Reducing Generalization of Conditioned Fear: Beneficial Impact of Fear Relevance and Feedback in Discrimination Training.

Authors:  Katharina Herzog; Marta Andreatta; Kristina Schneider; Miriam A Schiele; Katharina Domschke; Marcel Romanos; Jürgen Deckert; Paul Pauli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Associative learning shapes visual discrimination in a web-based classical conditioning task.

Authors:  Yannik Stegmann; Marta Andreatta; Paul Pauli; Matthias J Wieser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.