Literature DB >> 30770610

The genomic pool of standing structural variation outnumbers single nucleotide polymorphism by threefold in the marine teleost Chrysophrys auratus.

Andrew Catanach1, Ross Crowhurst2, Cecilia Deng2, Charles David1, Louis Bernatchez3, Maren Wellenreuther4,5.   

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted an important role of structural variation (SV) in ecological and evolutionary processes, but few have studied nonmodel species in the wild. As part of our long-term research programme on the nonmodel teleost fish Australasian snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), we aim to build one of the first catalogues of genomic variants (SNPs and indels, and deletions, duplications and inversions) in fishes and evaluate overlap of genomic variants with regions under putative selection (Tajima's D and π), and coding sequences (genes). For this, we analysed six males and six females from three locations in New Zealand and generated a high-resolution genomic variation catalogue. We characterized 20,385 SVs and found they intersected with almost a third of all annotated genes. Together with small indels, SVs account for three times more variation in the genome in terms of bases affected compared to SNPs. We found that a sizeable portion of detected SVs was in the upper and lower genomic regions of Tajima's D and π, indicating that some of these have an effect on the phenotype. Together, these results shed light on the often neglected genomic variation that is produced by SVs and highlights the need to go beyond the mere measure of SNPs when investigating evolutionary processes, such as species diversification and adaptation.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNV; SNP; indels; sex differences; standing variation; structural variation; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30770610     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  18 in total

1.  Evolution at two time frames: ancient structural variants involved in post-glacial divergence of the European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa).

Authors:  Alan Le Moan; Dorte Bekkevold; Jakob Hemmer-Hansen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Chromosome-Level Assembly of the Atlantic Silverside Genome Reveals Extreme Levels of Sequence Diversity and Structural Genetic Variation.

Authors:  Anna Tigano; Arne Jacobs; Aryn P Wilder; Ankita Nand; Ye Zhan; Job Dekker; Nina Overgaard Therkildsen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Extensive genome-wide duplications in the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica).

Authors:  Tejashree H Modak; Robert Literman; Jonathan B Puritz; Kevin M Johnson; Erin M Roberts; Dina Proestou; Ximing Guo; Marta Gomez-Chiarri; Rachel S Schwartz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern.

Authors:  Jana Wold; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Stephanie J Galla; David Eccles; Carolyn J Hogg; Marissa F Le Lec; Joseph Guhlin; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 6.622

5.  Consequences of Single-Locus and Tightly Linked Genomic Architectures for Evolutionary Responses to Environmental Change.

Authors:  Rebekah A Oomen; Anna Kuparinen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 6.  What can be learned by scanning the genome for molecular convergence in wild populations?

Authors:  Bonnie A Fraser; James R Whiting
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  A chromosome-level genome of Astyanax mexicanus surface fish for comparing population-specific genetic differences contributing to trait evolution.

Authors:  Wesley C Warren; Tyler E Boggs; Richard Borowsky; Brian M Carlson; Estephany Ferrufino; Joshua B Gross; LaDeana Hillier; Zhilian Hu; Alex C Keene; Alexander Kenzior; Johanna E Kowalko; Chad Tomlinson; Milinn Kremitzki; Madeleine E Lemieux; Tina Graves-Lindsay; Suzanne E McGaugh; Jeffrey T Miller; Mathilda T M Mommersteeg; Rachel L Moran; Robert Peuß; Edward S Rice; Misty R Riddle; Itzel Sifuentes-Romero; Bethany A Stanhope; Clifford J Tabin; Sunishka Thakur; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Nicolas Rohner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Machine-learning predicts genomic determinants of meiosis-driven structural variation in a eukaryotic pathogen.

Authors:  Thomas Badet; Simone Fouché; Fanny E Hartmann; Marcello Zala; Daniel Croll
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  The Role of Structural Variation in Adaptation and Evolution of Yeast and Other Fungi.

Authors:  Anton Gorkovskiy; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  How Important Are Structural Variants for Speciation?

Authors:  Linyi Zhang; Radka Reifová; Zuzana Halenková; Zachariah Gompert
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.