Literature DB >> 30770502

Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology.

Lara J Maxwell1,2, Dorcas E Beaton3,4, Beverley J Shea3,4, George A Wells3,4, Maarten Boers3,4, Shawna Grosskleg3,4, Clifton O Bingham3,4, Philip G Conaghan3,4, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino3,4, Maarten de Wit3,4, Laure Gossec3,4, Lyn March3,4, Lee S Simon3,4, Jasvinder A Singh3,4, Vibeke Strand3,4, Peter Tugwell3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 methodology for core domain set selection.
METHODS: The "OMERACT Way for Core Domain Set selection" framework consists of 3 stages: first, generating candidate domains through literature reviews and qualitative work, then a process of consensus to obtain agreement from those involved, and finally formal voting on the OMERACT Onion. The OMERACT Onion describes the placement of domains in layers/circles: mandatory in all trials/mandatory in specific circumstances (inner circle); important but optional (middle circle); or research agenda (outer circle). Five OMERACT working groups presented their core domain sets for endorsement by the OMERACT community. Tools including a workbook and whiteboard video were created to assist the process. The methods workshop at OMERACT 2018 introduced participants to this framework.
RESULTS: The 5 OMERACT working groups achieved consensus on their proposed core domain sets. After the Methodology Workshop training exercise at OMERACT 2018, over 90% of participants voted that they were confident that they understood the process of core domain set selection.
CONCLUSION: The methods described in this paper were successfully used by the 5 working groups voting on domains at the OMERACT 2018 meeting, demonstrating the feasibility of the process. In addition, participants at OMERACT 2018 expressed increased confidence and understanding of the core domain set selection process after the training exercise. This methodology will continue to evolve, and we will use innovative technology such as whiteboard videos as a key part of our dissemination and implementation strategy for new methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OMERACT; OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT HEALTH CARE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RHEUMATOLOGY

Year:  2019        PMID: 30770502     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  8 in total

1.  Next Step for Global Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: A Core Patient-Centered Outcome Set.

Authors:  Olga Husson; Bryce B Reeve; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Christabel K Cheung; Samantha Sodergren; Winette T A van der Graaf; John M Salsman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Review: Outcome measures in calcium pyrophosphate deposition.

Authors:  Ken Cai; Sara K Tedeschi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Outcome measurement instrument selection for lung physiology in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review using the OMERACT filter 2.1 process.

Authors:  David Roofeh; Shaney L Barratt; Athol U Wells; Leticia Kawano-Dourado; Donald Tashkin; Vibeke Strand; James Seibold; Susanna Proudman; Kevin K Brown; Paul F Dellaripa; Tracy Doyle; Thomas Leonard; Eric L Matteson; Chester V Oddis; Joshua J Solomon; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert Vassallo; Lara Maxwell; Dorcas Beaton; Robin Christensen; Whitney Townsend; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.431

Review 4.  Patient-centred clinical trial design.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Nicole Scholes-Robertson; Carmel Hawley; Andrea K Viecelli; Simon A Carter; Adeera Levin; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Tess Harris; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 42.439

5.  Outcome domains reported by patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals and stakeholders for calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD): A content analysis based on semi-structured qualitative interviews from the OMERACT CPPD working group.

Authors:  Amy Fuller; Ken Cai; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Georgios Filippou; Tristan Pascart; Owen Hensey; David Grossberg; Robin Christensen; Beverley Shea; Jasvinder A Singh; Sara K Tedeschi; Nicola Dalbeth; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.431

Review 6.  Development of a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a practical approach to an urgent unmet need.

Authors:  Lisa N Guo; Lourdes M Perez-Chada; Robert Borucki; Vinod E Nambudiri; Victoria P Werth; Joseph F Merola
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2021-12

7.  Protocol for the development of a core domain set for individuals with ankle osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Sultan Ayyadah Alanazi; Bill Vicenzino; Christiaan J A van Bergen; David J Hunter; Erik A Wikstrom; Hylton B Menz; Yvonne M Golightly; Michelle D Smith
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 8.  Towards development of core domain sets for short term and long term studies of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) disease: A framework paper by the OMERACT CPPD working group.

Authors:  Ken Cai; Amy Fuller; Yiling Zhang; Owen Hensey; David Grossberg; Robin Christensen; Beverley Shea; Jasvinder A Singh; Geraldine M McCarthy; Ann K Rosenthal; Georgios Filippou; William J Taylor; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Lisa K Stamp; N Lawrence Edwards; Tristan Pascart; Fabio Becce; Sabrina M Nielsen; Peter Tugwell; Dorcas Beaton; Abhishek Abhishek; Sara K Tedeschi; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.