Literature DB >> 30770058

Computer simulation clarifies mechanisms of carbon dioxide clearance during apnoea.

M Laviola1, A Das2, M Chikhani3, D G Bates2, J G Hardman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apnoeic oxygenation can come close to matching the oxygen demands of the apnoeic patient but does not facilitate carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination, potentially resulting in dangerous hypercapnia. Numerous studies have shown that high-flow nasal oxygen administration prevents hypoxaemia, and appears to reduce the rate of increase of arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2), but evidence is lacking to explain these effects.
METHODS: We extended a high-fidelity computational simulation of cardiopulmonary physiology to include modules allowing variable effects of: (a) cardiogenic oscillations affecting intrathoracic gas spaces, (b) gas mixing within the anatomical dead space, (c) insufflation into the trachea or above the glottis, and (d) pharyngeal pressure oscillation. We validated this model by reproducing the methods and results of five clinical studies on apnoeic oxygenation.
RESULTS: Simulated outputs best matched clinical data for model selection of parameters reflecting: (a) significant effects of cardiogenic oscillations on alveoli, both in terms of strength of the effect (4.5 cm H2O) and percentage of alveoli affected (60%), (b) augmented gas mixing within the anatomical dead space, and (c) pharyngeal pressure oscillations between 0 and 2 cm H2O at 70 Hz.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic oscillations, dead space gas mixing, and micro-ventilation induced by pharyngeal pressure variations appear to be important mechanisms that combine to facilitate the clearance of CO2 during apnoea. Evolution of high-flow oxygen insufflation devices should take advantage of these insights, potentially improving apnoeic gas exchange.
Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apnoea; carbon dioxide; computer simulation; high-flow nasal oxygenation; respiratory physiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30770058     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  Effect of oxygen fraction on airway rescue: a computational modelling study.

Authors:  Marianna Laviola; Christian Niklas; Anup Das; Declan G Bates; Jonathan G Hardman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Effect of variable pre-oxygenation endpoints on safe apnoea time using high flow nasal oxygen for women in labour: a modelling investigation.

Authors:  Daniel Stolady; Marianna Laviola; Arani Pillai; Jonathan G Hardman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Ventilation strategies for front of neck airway rescue: an in silico study.

Authors:  Marianna Laviola; Christian Niklas; Anup Das; Declan G Bates; Jonathan G Hardman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 11.719

4.  Management of primary blast lung injury: a comparison of airway pressure release versus low tidal volume ventilation.

Authors:  Timothy E Scott; Anup Das; Mainul Haque; Declan G Bates; Jonathan G Hardman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  High-flow nasal oxygenation for anesthetic management.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Kim; Takashi Asai
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-05

6.  High-flow nasal cannula therapy for initial oxygen administration in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: study protocol of randomised controlled unblinded trial.

Authors:  Asem Alnajada; Bronagh Blackwood; Abdulmajeed Mobrad; Adeel Akhtar; Murali Shyamsundar
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-01

Review 7.  THRIVE: five years on and into the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Anika Sud; Anil Patel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 9.166

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.