Literature DB >> 30770049

Safety of 80% vs 30-35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katharina Mattishent1, Menaka Thavarajah1, Ashnish Sinha1, Adam Peel1, Matthias Egger2, Joseph Solomkin3, Stijn de Jonge4, Asad Latif5, Sean Berenholtz5, Benedetta Allegranzi6, Yoon Kong Loke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended a high (80%) fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to reduce surgical site infection in adult surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. However, there is ongoing debate over the safety of high FiO2. We performed a systematic review to define the relative risk of clinically relevant adverse events (AE) associated with high FiO2.
METHODS: We reviewed potentially relevant articles from the WHO review supporting the recommendation, including an updated (July 2018) search of EMBASE and PubMed for randomised and non-randomised controlled studies reporting AE in surgical patients receiving 80% FiO2 compared with 30-35% FiO2. We assessed study quality and performed meta-analyses of risk ratios (RR) comparing 80% FiO2 against 30-35% for major complications, mortality, and intensive care admission.
RESULTS: We included 17 moderate-good quality trials and two non-randomised studies with serious-critical risk of bias. No evidence of harm with high FiO2 was found for major AE in the meta-analysis of randomised trials: atelectasis RR 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.42); cardiovascular events RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.32-2.54); intensive care admission RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.7-1.12); and death during the trial RR 0.49 (95% CI 0.17-1.37). One non-randomised study reported that high FiO2 was associated with major respiratory AE [RR 1.99 (95% CI 1.72-2.31)].
CONCLUSIONS: No definite signal of harm with 80% FiO2 in adult surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia was demonstrated and there is little evidence on safety-related issues to discourage its use in this population.
Copyright © 2018 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; general anaesthesia; high FiO(2); hyperoxia; peri-operative outcome; surgical site infection; surgical wound infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30770049     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  O2 No Longer the Go2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effects of Giving Perioperative Oxygen Therapy of 30% FiO2 to 80% FiO2 on Surgical Site Infection and Mortality.

Authors:  Brianna K Smith; Ross H Roberts; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Intraoperative Oxygen Concentration and Neurocognition after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Shahzad Shaefi; Puja Shankar; Ariel L Mueller; Brian P O'Gara; Kyle Spear; Kamal R Khabbaz; Aranya Bagchi; Louis M Chu; Valerie Banner-Goodspeed; David E Leaf; Daniel S Talmor; Edward R Marcantonio; Balachundhar Subramaniam
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Oxygen therapy for critically Ill and post-operative patients.

Authors:  Paul J Young; Daniel Frei
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Dangers of hyperoxia.

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Paul J Young; John G Laffey; Pierre Asfar; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Markus B Skrifvars; Christian S Meyhoff; Peter Radermacher
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Intraoperative Fractions of Inspiratory Oxygen Are Associated With Recurrence-Free Survival After Elective Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah Dehne; Verena Spang; Rosa Klotz; Laura Kummer; Samuel Kilian; Katrin Hoffmann; Martin A Schneider; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Markus A Weigand; Jan Larmann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Perioperative oxygen therapy: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Yen-Fu Chen; Amy Grove; Amy Hooper; Anna Wilson; Keith Couper; Marion Thompson; Olalekan Uthman; Rachel Court; Sara Tomassini; Joyce Yeung
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-12

7.  Hyperoxia Reprogrammes Microvascular Endothelial Cell Response to Hypoxia in an Organ-Specific Manner.

Authors:  Moritz Reiterer; Amanda Eakin; Randall S Johnson; Cristina M Branco
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 8.  Fraction of inspired oxygen during general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Høybye; Peter C Lind; Mathias J Holmberg; Maria Bolther; Marie K Jessen; Mikael F Vallentin; Frederik B Hansen; Johanne M Holst; Andreas Magnussen; Niklas S Hansen; Cecilie M Johannsen; Johannes Enevoldsen; Thomas H Jensen; Lara L Roessler; Maibritt P Klitholm; Mark A Eggertsen; Philip Caap; Caroline Boye; Karol M Dabrowski; Lasse Vormfenne; Jeppe Henriksen; Mathias Karlsson; Ida R Balleby; Marie S Rasmussen; Kim Paelestik; Asger Granfeldt; Lars W Andersen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.274

Review 9.  Target arterial PO2 according to the underlying pathology: a mini-review of the available data in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Julien Demiselle; Enrico Calzia; Clair Hartmann; David Alexander Christian Messerer; Pierre Asfar; Peter Radermacher; Thomas Datzmann
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Intraoperative Oxygen Concentration and Postoperative Delirium After Laparoscopic Gastric and Colorectal Malignancies Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xu Lin; Bin Wang; Ming-Shan Wang; Pei Wang; Ding-Wei Liu; Yu-Wei Guo; Chun-Hui Xie; Rui Dong; Li-Xin Sun; Yan-Lin Bi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.458

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.