Literature DB >> 3076999

Comparison of a daily and three intermittent retreatment regimens for pulmonary tuberculosis administered under programme conditions.

Y P Hong1, S C Kim, S C Chang, S J Kim, B W Jin, C D Park.   

Abstract

One daily and 3 thrice weekly retreatment regimens given for 12 months under programme conditions were compared. The daily regimen was rifampicin and ethambutol (RE7). The three intermittent regimens also contained rifampicin and ethambutol: one of them, rifampicin and ethambutol throughout (RE3); the next one supplemented with pyrazinamide for the first 3 months (REZ3); the last one supplemented with prothionamide for the first 3 months (REPt3). The pyrazinamide containing regimen was subdivided into ordinary and high dose groups. The subjects for retreatment were those who have had, at least, more than 6 months of initial triple chemotherapy of isoniazid, PAS and streptomycin at the health centres, and failed to convert to bacteriologically negative status. Among 419 patients who were available for sensitivity tests before commencing retreatment, 393 (94.3%) were resistant to isoniazid. Six hundred and seventy-four patients (674) were allocated randomly to the regimens: 64 patients were excluded due to various pretreatment reasons and 109 did not complete 12 months of chemotherapy. There remain 501 patients who completed their retreatment. As assessed at 12 months, a bacteriologically favourable response was achieved in 68% of 135 RE7 patients, 62% of 129 RE3 patients, 74% of 132 REZ3 patients, and in 79% of 108 REPt3 patients. Adverse reactions were uncommon: 4% in RE7, 5% in RE3 and 9% in REZ3, but 32% in REPt3. Relapse rates during 2 years after termination of chemotherapy were 15% in RE7, 14% in RE3 and REZ3, and 26% in REPt3, as calculated by life table analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3076999     DOI: 10.1016/0041-3879(88)90047-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tubercle        ISSN: 0041-3879


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hepatotoxic effects of therapies for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Bahaa E Senousy; Sanaa I Belal; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Payam Nahid; Susan E Dorman; Narges Alipanah; Pennan M Barry; Jan L Brozek; Adithya Cattamanchi; Lelia H Chaisson; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Malgosia Grzemska; Julie M Higashi; Christine S Ho; Philip C Hopewell; Salmaan A Keshavjee; Christian Lienhardt; Richard Menzies; Cynthia Merrifield; Masahiro Narita; Rick O'Brien; Charles A Peloquin; Ann Raftery; Jussi Saukkonen; H Simon Schaaf; Giovanni Sotgiu; Jeffrey R Starke; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Andrew Vernon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Avoidance and management of adverse reactions to antituberculosis drugs.

Authors:  A M Patel; J McKeon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Standardized treatment of active tuberculosis in patients with previous treatment and/or with mono-resistance to isoniazid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dick Menzies; Andrea Benedetti; Anita Paydar; Sarah Royce; Pai Madhukar; William Burman; Andrew Vernon; Christian Lienhardt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  What are the most efficacious treatment regimens for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  H R Stagg; R J Harris; H-A Hatherell; D Obach; H Zhao; N Tsuchiya; K Kranzer; V Nikolayevskyy; J Kim; M C Lipman; I Abubakar
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 9.139

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.