Literature DB >> 30769315

Protecting the environment from psychoactive drugs: Problems for regulators illustrated by the possible effects of tramadol on fish behaviour.

Rumi Tanoue1, Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci2, Belinda Huerta2, Tamsin J Runnalls2, Akifumi Eguchi3, Kei Nomiyama4, Tatsuya Kunisue4, Shinsuke Tanabe4, John P Sumpter2.   

Abstract

There is concern that psychoactive drugs present in the aquatic environment could affect the behaviour of fish, and other organisms, adversely. There is considerable experimental support for this concern, although the literature is not consistent. To investigate why, fish were exposed to three concentrations of the synthetic opiate tramadol for 23-24 days, and their anxiolytic behaviour in a novel tank diving test was assessed both before and after exposure. The results were difficult to interpret. The positive control drug, the anti-depressant fluoxetine, produced the expected results: exposed fish explored the novel tank more, and swam more slowly while doing so. An initial statistical analysis of the results provided relatively weak support for the conclusion that both the low and high concentrations of tramadol affected fish behaviour, but no evidence that the intermediate concentration did. To gain further insight, UK and Japanese experts in ecotoxicology were asked for their independent opinions on the data for tramadol. These were highly valuable. For example, about half the experts replied that a low concentration of a chemical can cause effects that higher concentrations do not, although a similar number did not believe this was possible. Based both on the inconclusive effects of tramadol on the behaviour of the fish and the very varied opinions of experts on the correct interpretation of those inconclusive data, it is obvious that more research on the behavioural effects of tramadol, and probably all other psychoactive drugs, on aquatic organisms is required before any meaningful risk assessments can be conducted. The relevance of these findings may apply much more widely than just the environmental risk assessment of psychoactive drugs. They suggest that much more rigorous training of research scientists and regulators is probably required if consensus decisions are to be reached that adequately protect the environment from chemicals.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fish behaviour; Interpretation of data; Psychoactive drugs; Tramadol; Varied opinions of experts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30769315     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Environmental Occurrence and Predicted Pharmacological Risk to Freshwater Fish of over 200 Neuroactive Pharmaceuticals in Widespread Use.

Authors:  John P Sumpter; Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Multicompartment and cross-species monitoring of contaminants of emerging concern in an estuarine habitat.

Authors:  Thomas H Miller; Keng Tiong Ng; Aaron Lamphiere; Tom C Cameron; Nicolas R Bury; Leon P Barron
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 3.  Pharmaceutical Pollution in Aquatic Environments: A Concise Review of Environmental Impacts and Bioremediation Systems.

Authors:  Maite Ortúzar; Maranda Esterhuizen; Darío Rafael Olicón-Hernández; Jesús González-López; Elisabet Aranda
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The Future of the Weight-of-Evidence Approach: A Response to Suter's Comments.

Authors:  Andrew C Johnson; John P Sumpter; Michael H Depledge
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.218

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.