David Houghton1, Paweł Zalewski2, Kate Hallsworth1, Sophie Cassidy1, Christian Thoma1, Leah Avery1, Joanna Slomko2, Timothy Hardy3, Alastair D Burt4, Dina Tiniakos5, Kieren G Hollingsworth1, Roy Taylor1, Christopher P Day3, Steven Masson3, Stuart McPherson3, Quentin M Anstee3, Julia L Newton3, Michael I Trenell6. 1. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 2. Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Ergonomics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Faculty of Health Sciences, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland. 3. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Liver Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Level 2, Barr Smith South, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. 5. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Dept of Pathology, Aretaieion Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11528, Greece. 6. Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: michael.trenell@ncl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cardiovascular disease is the principle cause of death in patients with elevated liver fat unrelated to alcohol consumption, more so than liver-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between liver fat and cardiac and autonomic function, as well as to assess how impairment in cardiac and autonomic function is influenced by metabolic risk factors. METHODS: Cardiovascular and autonomic function were assessed in 96 sedentary individuals: i) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n = 46, hepatic steatosis >5% by magnetic resonance spectroscopy), ii) Hepatic steatosis and alcohol (dual aetiology fatty liver disease [DAFLD]) (n = 16, hepatic steatosis >5%, consuming >20 g/day of alcohol) and iii) CONTROL (n = 34, no cardiac, liver or metabolic disorders, <20 g/day of alcohol). RESULTS: Patients with NAFLD and DAFLD had significantly impaired cardiac and autonomic function when compared with controls. Diastolic variability and systolic variability (LF/HF-sBP [n/1]; 2.3 (1.7) and 2.3 (1.5) vs. 3.4 (1.5), p <0.01) were impaired in patients with NAFLD and DAFLD when compared to controls, with DAFLD individuals showing a decrease in diastolic variability relative to NAFLD patients. Hepatic steatosis and fasting glucose were negatively correlated with stroke volume index. Fibrosis stage was significantly negatively associated with mean blood pressure (r = -0.47, p = 0.02), diastolic variability (r = -0.58, p ≤0.01) and systolic variability (r = -0.42, p = 0.04). Hepatic steatosis was independently associated with cardiac function (p ≤0.01); TNF-α (p ≤0.05) and CK-18 (p ≤0.05) were independently associated with autonomic function. CONCLUSION: Cardiac and autonomic impairments appear to be dependent on level of liver fat, metabolic dysfunction, inflammation and fibrosis staging, and to a lesser extent alcohol intake. Interventions should be sought to moderate the excess cardiovascular risk in patients with NAFLD or DAFLD. LAY SUMMARY: Increased levels of fat in the liver impair the ability of the cardiovascular system to work properly. The amount of fat in the liver, metabolic control, inflammation and alcohol are all linked to the degree that the cardiovascular system is affected.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Cardiovascular disease is the principle cause of death in patients with elevated liver fat unrelated to alcohol consumption, more so than liver-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between liver fat and cardiac and autonomic function, as well as to assess how impairment in cardiac and autonomic function is influenced by metabolic risk factors. METHODS: Cardiovascular and autonomic function were assessed in 96 sedentary individuals: i) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n = 46, hepatic steatosis >5% by magnetic resonance spectroscopy), ii) Hepatic steatosis and alcohol (dual aetiology fatty liver disease [DAFLD]) (n = 16, hepatic steatosis >5%, consuming >20 g/day of alcohol) and iii) CONTROL (n = 34, no cardiac, liver or metabolic disorders, <20 g/day of alcohol). RESULTS:Patients with NAFLD and DAFLD had significantly impaired cardiac and autonomic function when compared with controls. Diastolic variability and systolic variability (LF/HF-sBP [n/1]; 2.3 (1.7) and 2.3 (1.5) vs. 3.4 (1.5), p <0.01) were impaired in patients with NAFLD and DAFLD when compared to controls, with DAFLD individuals showing a decrease in diastolic variability relative to NAFLD patients. Hepatic steatosis and fasting glucose were negatively correlated with stroke volume index. Fibrosis stage was significantly negatively associated with mean blood pressure (r = -0.47, p = 0.02), diastolic variability (r = -0.58, p ≤0.01) and systolic variability (r = -0.42, p = 0.04). Hepatic steatosis was independently associated with cardiac function (p ≤0.01); TNF-α (p ≤0.05) and CK-18 (p ≤0.05) were independently associated with autonomic function. CONCLUSION: Cardiac and autonomic impairments appear to be dependent on level of liver fat, metabolic dysfunction, inflammation and fibrosis staging, and to a lesser extent alcohol intake. Interventions should be sought to moderate the excess cardiovascular risk in patients with NAFLD or DAFLD. LAY SUMMARY: Increased levels of fat in the liver impair the ability of the cardiovascular system to work properly. The amount of fat in the liver, metabolic control, inflammation and alcohol are all linked to the degree that the cardiovascular system is affected.
Authors: Yao Tang; Juan Huang; Wen Yue Zhang; Si Qin; Yi Xuan Yang; Hong Ren; Qin-Bing Yang; Huaidong Hu Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Scott M Williams; Aikaterini Eleftheriadou; Uazman Alam; Daniel J Cuthbertson; John P H Wilding Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: In Young Choi; Yoosoo Chang; Geonggyu Kang; Hyun-Suk Jung; Hocheol Shin; Sarah H Wild; Christopher D Byrne; Seungho Ryu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 4.379