| Literature DB >> 30768983 |
Hadi Karimzadeh1, Muthamia M Kiraithe2, Valerie Oberhardt3, Elahe Salimi Alizei4, Jan Bockmann5, Julian Schulze Zur Wiesch5, Bettina Budeus6, Daniel Hoffmann6, Heiner Wedemeyer7, Markus Cornberg8, Adalbert Krawczyk9, Jassin Rashidi-Alavijeh10, Francisco Rodríguez-Frías11, Rosario Casillas11, Maria Buti11, Antonina Smedile12, Seyed Moayed Alavian13, Andreas Heinold14, Florian Emmerich15, Marcus Panning16, Emma Gostick17, David A Price17, Jörg Timm18, Maike Hofmann2, Bijan Raziorrouh19, Robert Thimme2, Ulrike Protzer20, Michael Roggendorf21, Christoph Neumann-Haefelin22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) superinfection in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is associated with rapid progression to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment options are limited, and no vaccine is available. Although HDV-specific CD8+ T cells are thought to control the virus, little is known about which HDV epitopes are targeted by virus-specific CD8+ T cells or why these cells ultimately fail to control the infection. We aimed to define how HDV escapes the CD8+ T-cell-mediated response.Entities:
Keywords: Antigen Presentation; Cytotoxic T Cell; MHC Class I; TCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30768983 PMCID: PMC6486497 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterology ISSN: 0016-5085 Impact factor: 22.682
HLA Class I–Associated Viral Sequence Polymorphisms and HDV-Specific CD8+ T Cell Epitopes
| No. | HLA | AA position | Mutation | AA sequence epitope candidate | AA range | Positive responses/number of patients tested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 | B*13 | 33 | D33E | .0001 | 33–41 | 0/5 | |
| 3 | |||||||
| 4 | A*29 | 63 | K63R | .0002 | — | — | — |
| 5 | A*30 | 47 | D47E | .0010 | KVKKKIKK | 36–43 | 0/3 |
| 6 | |||||||
| 7 | B*49 | 37 | V37A/T | .0015 | EELERDLRK | 28–37 | ND |
| 8 | B*13 | 100 | Q100K | .0018 | R | 99–108 | 0/5 |
| 9 | B*51 | 81 | V81I | .0019 | — | — | — |
| 10 | B*13 | 43 | K43R | .0021 | DLRKVKKKI | 33–41 | 0/5 |
| 11 | B*41 | 158 | G158A/D/M | .0023 | — | — | — |
| 12 | |||||||
| 13 | A*33 | 37 | V37T/A | .0028 | EELERDLR | 28–35 | ND |
| 14 | B*14 | 107 | A107T | .0028 | DHRRRK | 101–108 | 0/1 |
| 15 | A*30 | 49 | P49L/S | .0031 | KVKKKIKK | 36–43 | 0/3 |
| 16 | |||||||
| 17 | B*13 | 96 | D96E | .0035 | RQDHRRRKAL | 99–108 | 0/5 |
| 18 | |||||||
| 19 | B*38 | 131 | K131G | .0039 | — | — | — |
| 20 | B*13 | 113 | K113R | .0043 | RQDHRRRKAL | 99–108 | 0/5 |
| 113–122 | 0/5 | ||||||
| 21 | A*68 | 134 | T134A | .0045 | L | 133–140 | 0/5 |
NOTE. Confirmed epitopes are displayed in bold.
AA, amino acid; ND, not done.
Figure 1HLA-B*15–restricted CD8+ T-cell responses specific for L-HDAg170–179 drive viral escape. (A) P values for the associations between HDV sequence polymorphisms and the presence of HLA-B*15, plotted for each amino acid residue in the L-HDAg protein. The cutoff for significance was set at P = .005 (dotted red line). (B) Predicted HLA-B*15 binding affinity of candidate peptide epitopes in L-HDAg. IC50 values were predicted for 8mers, 9mers, and 10mers with the ANN 3.4 method (www.iedb.org). The best hit corresponding to the confirmed HLA-B*15–restricted epitope L-HDAg170–179 is highlighted in green. (C) Viral sequences from individual HLA-B*15+ and HLA-B*15– patients compared with the consensus sequence derived from all 104 patients (all HLA-B*15+ patients are shown above the line, and the first 20 HLA-B*15– patients are shown below the line). Dots indicate agreement with consensus, and single-letter amino acid codes indicate variation from consensus. The HLA-B*15–associated polymorphism S170N is highlighted in dark grey, and the confirmed HLA-B*15–restricted epitope L-HDAg170–179 is highlighted in grey. (D) PBMCs from HLA-B*15+ patient 13 (2 years after IFN treatment) were expanded in the presence of the wild-type or variant peptide corresponding to the L-HDAg170–179 epitope. After 14 days, cells were restimulated in parallel with each peptide and tested for IFN gamma production. Negative controls without peptide restimulation and positive controls stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin are also shown. (E) Equivalent results after restimulation with each peptide in serial dilution assays. PBMCs from patient 13 (2 and 7 years after IFN treatment) and HLA-B*15+ patient 21 were processed and tested as in D. M, mol/L; P, patient; PMA, phorbol myristate acetate.
Figure 2Viral sequence polymorphisms are associated with infrequent HLA class I alleles and spare the N- and C-termini of L-HDAg. (A) Distribution of identified HLA footprints across L-HDAg. Red arrows indicate HLA footprints corresponding to confirmed (predescribed or newly identified) epitopes. Filled black arrows indicate HLA footprints corresponding to predicted epitopes. Empty black arrows indicate HLA footprints without defined or predicted epitopes. Newly identified epitopes are shown as red bars, and pre-described epitopes are shown as blue bars. (B) HLA-A and HLA-B allele frequencies in the study cohort compared with reference populations from Germany, Italy, and Iran. HLA class I alleles identified in at least 2 patients in the study cohort are shown (HLA class I alleles present in 1 patient cannot reach statistical power for the identification of HLA class I–associated viral sequence polymorphisms). Footprint-linked HLA class I alleles are shown in bold and marked with an arrowhead.
Figure 3HLA-B*18–restricted CD8+ T-cell responses specific for L-HDAg46–54 drive viral escape and population-level evolution of HDV. (A–E) Details as per the corresponding panels in Figure 1. In this case, the ancestral peptide is denoted as the prototype, and the variant peptide is denoted as the consensus, reflecting a negative association between HLA-B*18 and the viral polymorphism D47E. Representative data from patient 3 are shown in (D) and (E). M, mol/L; PMA, phorbol myristate acetate.
Figure 4The rare allotype HLA-B*37 selects for viral escape in the CD8+ T-cell epitopes L-HDAg81–90 and L-HDAg100–108. (A–E) Details as per the corresponding panels in Figure 1. (B) the BIMAS score (higher scores indicate higher binding affinities) was used in place of the ANN 3.4 method, which does not include a prediction algorithm for HLA-B*37 binders. (D, E) Representative data from patient 1 (epitope L-HDAg100–108). PMA, phorbol myristate acetate.
Figure 5Viral escape in the HLA-B*15–restricted epitope L-HDAg170–179 after superinfection with HDV. (A) Clinical course of HDV/HBV superinfection in patient 18 (HLA-A*24:02+, -B*15:01+, -B*35:02+). (B) Viral sequences in patient 18 at early (week 0 and week 2) and late time points (week 71 and week 200) after superinfection with HDV. All longitudinal sequence variants are shown (n = 4). Dots indicate agreement with consensus across the study cohort. Residues with de novo mutations are shown in red, and residues that revert to wild type are shown in green. The de novo mutation S170N is located in the confirmed HLA-B*15–restricted epitope L-HDAg170–179 and corresponds to the linked footprint (Table 1). Also, the F27L reversion colocalizes with an anchor residue for the pre-described HLA-A*02–restricted epitope L-HDAg26–34. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; T, time.
Figure 6Characterization of HLA-B*15–restricted HDV-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with resolved or persistent HDV infection. (A) HLA-B*15–restricted CD8+ T cells specific for L-HDAg170–179 were tetramer-enriched from PBMCs isolated from patients with chronic HDV/HBV infection. Representative tetramer stainings from patient 13 (relatively large tetramer+ population) and patient 17 (relatively small tetramer+ population) are shown before (upper panels) and after enrichment (lower panels). (B) Frequency of tetramer+ cells among total CD8+ T cells. HDV-specific CD8+ T cells from 7 patients with chronic HDV/HBV infection and 1 patient with resolved HDV infection (patient 5, highlighted in red) were compared with HCV-specific CD8+ T cells targeting epitopes with conserved or escaped viral sequences in chronic HCV infection. Autologous viral sequences corresponding to the L-HDAg170–179 epitope are displayed next to the patient codes. S170N indicates the presence of the viral escape sequence, and S170S/N indicates presence of the prototype and the viral escape sequence, respectively. ND indicates that sequences were not obtained from patients with low levels of HDV RNA. (C–H) Enriched HDV-specific CD8+ T cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Gray histograms indicate non-naive bulk CD8+ T cells. Representative plots are derived from patient 21. (C) Distribution among naive (CD45RA+CD27+CCR7+), central memory (CD45RO+CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RO+CCR7–), and terminally differentiated effector memory subsets (CD45RO–CCR7–). (D) Expression levels of the exhaustion markers PD-1 and KLRG1. (E) Expression levels of the transcriptions factors T-bet and Eomes. (F) Expression of the activation marker CD38 compared with HCV-specific CD8+ T cells targeting epitopes with conserved (wildtype) or escaped viral sequences in chronic HCV infection. (G) Distribution among subsets defined by expression levels of PD-1 and CD127. (H) Expression of the transcription factors TCF1 and BCL2. Dotted lines indicates fluorescence-minus-1 controls. MFI, median fluorescence intensity; ND, not done; P, patient; TCM, central memory; TEM, effector memory; TEMRA, terminally differentiated effector-memory subset; wt, wild type.