Hyo Geun Choi1, Yoon Jung Jung2, Suk Woo Lee3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea; Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ssugucap@naver.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premenopausal hysterectomy is associated with a decreased ovarian reserve, follicular atresia, and subsequently reduced long-term estrogen secretion. Therefore, women who undergo hysterectomy will experience greater gradual bone mineral loss than women with an intact uterus and have an increased risk of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between hysterectomy without/with bilateral oophorectomy and the occurrence of osteoporosis using a national sample cohort from South Korea. STUDY DESIGN: Using the national cohort study from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, we extracted data for patients who had undergone hysterectomy (n=9082) and for a 1:4 matched control group (n=36,328) and then analyzed the occurrence of osteoporosis. The patients were matched according to age, sex, income, region of residence, and medical history. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and bilateral oophorectomy status. The age of the participants was defined as the age at the time of hysterectomy. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio for osteoporosis was 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.53, P<.001) in the hysterectomy group. The adjusted hazard ratios for osteoporosis in the different age subgroups of this group were 1.84 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-2.10) for ages 40-44 years, 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.66) for ages 45-49 years, 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.62) for ages 50-54 years, 1.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.96, all P<.001) for ages 55-59 years, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.23, P=.223) for ages ≥60 years. The adjusted hazard ratios for osteoporosis according to hysterectomy/oophorectomy status were 1.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.51) in the hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy group and 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.79) in the hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy group. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of osteoporosis was increased in patients who had undergone hysterectomy compared with that in matched control subjects regardless of bilateral oophorectomy status.
BACKGROUND: Premenopausal hysterectomy is associated with a decreased ovarian reserve, follicular atresia, and subsequently reduced long-term estrogen secretion. Therefore, women who undergo hysterectomy will experience greater gradual bone mineral loss than women with an intact uterus and have an increased risk of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between hysterectomy without/with bilateral oophorectomy and the occurrence of osteoporosis using a national sample cohort from South Korea. STUDY DESIGN: Using the national cohort study from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, we extracted data for patients who had undergone hysterectomy (n=9082) and for a 1:4 matched control group (n=36,328) and then analyzed the occurrence of osteoporosis. The patients were matched according to age, sex, income, region of residence, and medical history. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and bilateral oophorectomy status. The age of the participants was defined as the age at the time of hysterectomy. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio for osteoporosis was 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.53, P<.001) in the hysterectomy group. The adjusted hazard ratios for osteoporosis in the different age subgroups of this group were 1.84 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-2.10) for ages 40-44 years, 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.66) for ages 45-49 years, 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.62) for ages 50-54 years, 1.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.96, all P<.001) for ages 55-59 years, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.23, P=.223) for ages ≥60 years. The adjusted hazard ratios for osteoporosis according to hysterectomy/oophorectomy status were 1.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.51) in the hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy group and 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.79) in the hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy group. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of osteoporosis was increased in patients who had undergone hysterectomy compared with that in matched control subjects regardless of bilateral oophorectomy status.