BACKGROUND: FVC may underestimate the slow vital capacity (SVC) due to early closure of the small airways at low lung volumes in the forced maneuver. It remains unclear whether using SVC instead of FVC in the FEV1/vital capacity (VC) ratio increases the yield of spirometry in detecting airflow limitation or, alternatively, leads to a false-positive finding for obstruction. METHODS: This study included 13,893 adult outpatients with FEV1/FVC and total lung capacity at or above the lower limit of normal. A cluster of clinical and physiological variables defined the probability of airway disease and dysfunction, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of "discordance" (preserved FEV1/FVC but low FEV1/SVC) was 20.4%: discordant subjects had lower mid-expiratory flows, higher airway resistance, worse gas trapping, and ventilation distribution abnormalities than "concordant" subjects (both ratios preserved) (P < .05). Regardless of sex, age < 60 years, BMI > 30 kg/m2, and FEV1 > 70% predicted were associated with discordance (P < .001). Discordant subjects with preserved FEV1/FVC but low FEV1/SVC were four times more likely to be diagnosed with an obstructive airway disease by a respirologist compared with those with preserved FEV1/SVC and FEV1/FVC. The only exception was in the elderly subgroup with discordance (age > 70 years): only 10% of these subjects were subsequently diagnosed with an airway disease (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Using SVC instead of FVC in the FEV1/VC ratio enhances the yield of spirometry in detecting mild airflow obstruction in younger and obese subjects. The FEV1/SVC ratio, however, should be used with caution in elderly subjects with preserved FEV1/FVC because a low value may represent a false-positive finding for airflow limitation.
BACKGROUND: FVC may underestimate the slow vital capacity (SVC) due to early closure of the small airways at low lung volumes in the forced maneuver. It remains unclear whether using SVC instead of FVC in the FEV1/vital capacity (VC) ratio increases the yield of spirometry in detecting airflow limitation or, alternatively, leads to a false-positive finding for obstruction. METHODS: This study included 13,893 adult outpatients with FEV1/FVC and total lung capacity at or above the lower limit of normal. A cluster of clinical and physiological variables defined the probability of airway disease and dysfunction, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of "discordance" (preserved FEV1/FVC but low FEV1/SVC) was 20.4%: discordant subjects had lower mid-expiratory flows, higher airway resistance, worse gas trapping, and ventilation distribution abnormalities than "concordant" subjects (both ratios preserved) (P < .05). Regardless of sex, age < 60 years, BMI > 30 kg/m2, and FEV1 > 70% predicted were associated with discordance (P < .001). Discordant subjects with preserved FEV1/FVC but low FEV1/SVC were four times more likely to be diagnosed with an obstructive airway disease by a respirologist compared with those with preserved FEV1/SVC and FEV1/FVC. The only exception was in the elderly subgroup with discordance (age > 70 years): only 10% of these subjects were subsequently diagnosed with an airway disease (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Using SVC instead of FVC in the FEV1/VC ratio enhances the yield of spirometry in detecting mild airflow obstruction in younger and obese subjects. The FEV1/SVC ratio, however, should be used with caution in elderly subjects with preserved FEV1/FVC because a low value may represent a false-positive finding for airflow limitation.
Authors: Spyridon Fortis; Alejandro P Comellas; Surya P Bhatt; Eric A Hoffman; MeiLan K Han; Nirav R Bhakta; Robert Paine; Bonnie Ronish; Richard E Kanner; Mark Dransfield; Daniel Hoesterey; Russell G Buhr; R Graham Barr; Brett Dolezal; Victor E Ortega; M Bradley Drummond; Mehrdad Arjomandi; Robert J Kaner; Victor Kim; Jeffrey L Curtis; Russell P Bowler; Fernando Martinez; Wassim W Labaki; Christopher B Cooper; Wanda K O'Neal; Gerald Criner; Nadia N Hansel; Jerry A Krishnan; Prescott Woodruff; David Couper; Donald Tashkin; Igor Barjaktarevic Journal: Chest Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 10.262