Literature DB >> 30768786

Hyperprogressive disease in early-phase immunotherapy trials: Clinical predictors and association with immune-related toxicities.

Yada Kanjanapan1,2, Daphne Day1,2, Lisa Wang3, Hamad Al-Sawaihey4, Engy Abbas4, Amirali Namini4, Lillian L Siu1,2, Aaron Hansen1,2, Albiruni Abdul Razak1,2, Anna Spreafico1,2, Natasha Leighl1, Anthony M Joshua1,2, Marcus O Butler1,2, David Hogg1, Mary Anne Chappell1, Ludmilla Soultani2, Kayla Chow2, Samantha Boujos2, Philippe L Bedard1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors experience an accelerated tumor growth rate (TGR) in comparison with pretreatment kinetics; this is known as hyperprogression. This study assessed the relation between hyperprogressive disease (HPD) and treatment-related toxicity and clinical factors.
METHODS: This study reviewed patients with solid tumors who were enrolled in early-phase immunotherapy trials at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between August 2012 and September 2016 and had computed tomography scans in the pre-immunotherapy (reference) and on-immunotherapy (experimental) periods. HPD was defined as progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 at the first on-treatment scan and a ≥2-fold increase in TGR between the reference and experimental periods. Treatment-related toxicities requiring systemic therapy, drug delays, or discontinuation were considered clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs).
RESULTS: Of 352 patients, 182 were eligible for analysis. The median age was 60 years, and 54% were male. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (32%) or 1 (68%). The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was 0/1 in 59%. Single-agent immunotherapy was given to 80% of the patients. Most patients (89%) received anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 antibodies alone or in combination with other therapies. HPD occurred in 12 of 182 patients (7%). A higher proportion of females was seen among HPD patients (P = .01), but no association with age, performance status, tumor type, RMH prognostic score, combination immunotherapy, or CSAEs was found. The 1-year overall survival rate was 28% for HPD patients and 53% for non-HPD patients (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.3; P = .11).
CONCLUSIONS: HPD was observed in 7% of patients with solid tumors treated with immunotherapy. HPD was not associated with CSAEs, age, tumor type, or the type of immunotherapy but was more common in females.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; hyperprogressive disease; immunotherapy; toxicities

Year:  2019        PMID: 30768786     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  43 in total

1.  Hyperprogressive disease with immunotherapy: new directions.

Authors:  Sally C M Lau; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Resistance to Immunotherapy: Mechanisms and Means for Overcoming.

Authors:  Mohamad A Salkeni; John Y Shin; James L Gulley
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Pretreatment Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose May Be a Useful New Predictor of Early Progressive Disease following Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yusuke Kawamura; Masahiro Kobayashi; Junichi Shindoh; Masaru Matsumura; Satoshi Okubo; Nozomu Muraishi; Shunichiro Fujiyama; Tetsuya Hosaka; Satoshi Saitoh; Hitomi Sezaki; Norio Akuta; Fumitaka Suzuki; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Kenji Ikeda; Yasuji Arase; Masaji Hashimoto; Hiromitsu Kumada
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 4.  Hyperprogressive Disease upon Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Focus on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lo Russo; Francesco Facchinetti; Marcello Tiseo; Marina Chiara Garassino; Roberto Ferrara
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Combined with interventional therapy, immunotherapy can create a new outlook for tumor treatment.

Authors:  Tonglei Fang; Junyuan Xiao; Yiran Zhang; Haiyan Hu; Yueqi Zhu; Yingsheng Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

6.  Clinical characteristics of hyperprogressive disease in NSCLC after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Junjie Hu; Fangfang Bu; Haiping Zhang; Ke Fei; Peng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  The Challenges of Tumor Mutational Burden as an Immunotherapy Biomarker.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Aaron Goodman; Debora de Melo Gagliato; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 8.  The dark side of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Nwanneka Okwundu; Douglas Grossman; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Kenneth F Grossmann; Umang Swami
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  Novel patterns of progression upon immunotherapy in other thoracic malignancies and uncommon populations.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrara; Diego Signorelli; Claudia Proto; Arsela Prelaj; Marina Chiara Garassino; Giuseppe Lo Russo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Hyperprogressive Disease in Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Pan Shen; Liang Han; Xin Ba; Kai Qin; Shenghao Tu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.