Literature DB >> 30768662

Influence of Transmucosal Area Morphology on Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Tissue-Level Implants.

Rubén Agustín-Panadero, Nuria Martínez-Martínez, Lucía Fernandez-Estevan, Joan Faus-López, M Fernanda Solá-Ruíz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze peri-implant bone loss around two types of tissue-level implants (convergent and divergent transmucosal morphology) placed in the same region of either the maxilla or mandible in a single surgical session.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients who each received two implants, one with a convergent transmucosal collar (n = 21) the other with a divergent collar (n = 21). Implants were placed in a single surgical session, by the same clinician, in the same clinical setting at the Prosthodontic and Occlusion Unit, University of Valencia (Spain). The implants (n = 42) were restored with splinted crowns screwed directly onto the prosthetic platforms. Bone loss analysis consisted of measurements taken from periapical radiographs 24 months after loading. Statistical analysis evaluated the homogeneity of the groups using Pearson's chisquare test; bone loss was compared with the Wilcoxon test. Statistical significance was set at 5% (α = .05), with a confidence interval of 95% and a power of 57%.
RESULTS: Implants with convergent transmucosal morphology presented less mean peri-implant bone loss (0.29 ± 0.34 mm) than those with divergent transmucosal morphology (0.60 ± 0.63 mm), with a statistically significant difference between the two types of implants (P = .031).
CONCLUSION: Less peri-implant bone loss occurs around supracrestal implants with convergent transmucosal morphology than divergent transmucosal morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30768662     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Peri-Implant Tissue Adaptation after Implant Rehabilitation with Shoulderless Abutments with 24 Months of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Luca Casula; Alex Gillone; Davide Musu
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-01-07

2.  Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using Trans-Mucosal Tissue-Level Implants with and without Implant-Abutment Units: A Case Report.

Authors:  Massimo Carossa; Mario Alovisi; Armando Crupi; Giulia Ambrogio; Francesco Pera
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 3.  Bone loss-related factors in tissue and bone level dental implants: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Hamed Mortazavi; Amin Khodadoustan; Aida Kheiri; Lida Kheiri
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Antonio Fons-Font; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saverio Cosola; Simone Marconcini; Michela Boccuzzi; Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris; Ugo Covani; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss with a Convergent Transmucosal Morphology: Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  María Costa Castillo; Martín Laguna Martos; Rocío Marco Pitarch; Marina García Selva; Silvia Del Cid Rodríguez; Carla Fons-Badal; Rubén Agustín Panadero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.