Literature DB >> 30767317

Measuring patient trust: Comparing measures from a survey and an economic experiment.

Roxanne J Kovacs1, Mylene Lagarde2, John Cairns1.   

Abstract

Despite its importance in health care, empirical evidence on patient trust is limited. This is likely because, as with many complex concepts, trust is difficult to measure. This study measured patient trust in health care providers in a sample of 667 patients in Senegal. Two instruments were used to measure patient trust in providers: a survey questionnaire and an incentivised behavioural economic experiment-a "trust game." The results show that the two measures are significantly, but weakly, associated. Using information from patients and providers, we find that continuity of care, provider communication ability, and clinical competence were positively associated with patient trust. Based on the results obtained from both methods, the trust game seems to have higher construct validity than the survey instrument in this context. This paper contributes to the methodological literature on patient trust and the evidence on the determinants of patient trust. It suggests that researchers interested in studying patient trust in providers should rely more on economic experiments and explore their validity in different contexts.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Senegal; Trust in Physician Scale; patient-provider relationship; trust; trust game

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30767317     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  1 in total

1.  Patients' trust and associated factors among primary care institutions in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Liqing Li; Liyong Zhu; Xiaogang Zhou; Guohua Zeng; Hongwei Huang; Yong Gan; Zuxun Lu; Xiaofang Wang; Zhensheng Chen; Ke Sun; Di Yang; Qi Zhang; Chunmei Wu
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.