| Literature DB >> 30766688 |
Kelley Pettee Gabriel1,2,3, Jessica M Mason1,2,3, Barbara Sternfeld4.
Abstract
Although the health benefits of physical activity are well established, the prevalence of midlife women accumulating sufficient physical activity to meet current physical activity guidelines is strikingly low, as shown in United States (U.S.) based surveillance systems that utilize either (or both) participant-reported and device-based (i.e., accelerometers) measures of activity. For midlife women, these low prevalence estimates may be due, in part, to a general lack of time given more pressing work commitments and family obligations. Further, the benefits or "reward" of allocating limited time to physical activity may be perceived, by some, as too distant for immediate action or attention. However, shifting the health promotion message from the long term benefits of physical activity to the more short-term, acute benefits may encourage midlife women to engage in more regular physical activity. In this article, we review the latest evidence (i.e., past 5 years) regarding the impact of physical activity on menopausal symptoms. Recent studies provide strong support for the absence of an effect of physical activity on vasomotor symptoms; evidence is still inconclusive regarding the role of physical activity on urogenital symptoms (vaginal dryness, urinary incontinence) and sleep, but consistently suggestive of a positive impact on mood and weight control. To further advance this field, we also propose additional considerations and future research directions.Entities:
Keywords: Menopause; Midlife; Physical activity; Women
Year: 2015 PMID: 30766688 PMCID: PMC6214216 DOI: 10.1186/s40695-015-0004-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Womens Midlife Health ISSN: 2054-2690
Selected studies of physical activity and vasomotor symptoms (includes hot flashes and night sweats)
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Detailed findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||||
| Canário et al. 2012 [ | Population-based sample of 370 women from Natal, Brazil aged 40-65 | International Physical Activity Questionnaire with three categories of classification: sedentary, moderately active and very active (vigorous) | Blatt–Kupperman Menopausal Index with three categories of classification: mild (≤19), moderate (20–35), or severe (>35) | Socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics | Bivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant inverse association between physical activity and hot flashes | x | |||
| Haimov-Kochman et al. 2013 [ | 151 healthy women aged 45–55 who attended the menopause clinic at the Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Jerusalem, Israel) | Physical activity was quantified by self-reported frequency of exercise (1–7 times a week), and categorized into 3 groups: 1–2; 3–4; 5–7 times per week | The Greene climactic scale, estimates include total score. Subscores for psychological, somatic/physical, sexual, and vasomotor symptoms also reported | Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle (behavioral) variables | There was no association between physical activity frequency and the vasomotor subscale | x | |||
| Kandish et al. 2010 [ | Female employees at a Mid-Western University were invited to participate in an on-line survey. The analytic sample included 196 women aged ≥40 years that did not smoke or use hormone therapy | Usual physical activity per week reported via 30 min intervals of aerobic and strength activity. Intensity of activity was reported as mild, moderate, or heavy | Usual daily frequency and severity (10-point scale, ranging from ‘very mild’ to ‘very severe’) of hot flashes were ascertained | Socio-demographic characteristics, alcohol and caffeine consumption | Adjusted analyses, suggested higher frequency of aerobic physical activity significantly increased the frequency of hot flashes. Yet, higher intensity of aerobic physical activity was associated with decreased frequency and severity of hot flashes | x | |||
| Mansikkamäki et al. 2015 [ | Random sample of 5000 women born in 1963 was obtained from the Finnish Population Register Centre. Analytic sample included 2606 women aged 49 years old that responded to a postal survey in 2012 | A single item pertaining to usual exercise (frequency and duration) per week during past 12-months. Women were classified as ‘active’ if they reported ≥ 150 min per week of moderate intensity or ≥75 min of vigorous intensity, with strength training and balance training | Women’s Health Questionnaire addressing nine domains of physical and emotional experiences, including vasomotor symptoms | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, self-rated health | In the unadjusted models, inactive women had a higher odds of vasomotor symptoms (POR 1.19; 95 % CI: 1.03–1.36). However, after adjustment for BMI and education level, results were no longer statistically significant | x | |||
| Moilanen et al. 2010 [ | Participants drawn from Finnish Health 2000 Study ( | Physical activity was assessed via a single item on the questionnaire, “How much do you exercise or strain yourself physically in your leisure time” with four response options ranging from ‘sedentary’ (reading, watching television) to ‘competitive sports’. Participants were classified based on low, moderate, and high physical activity | Severity of general symptoms, including vasomotor symptoms, were assessed via two items on the questionnaire | Socio-demographics, health behaviors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and hormone therapy use | Low active women reported significantly more vasomotor symptoms (β = 0.18; 95 % CI: 0.10, 0.27) than the high active group after adjustment for baseline age, menopausal status, education, chronic disease, and hormone therapy use | x | |||
| Pimenta et al. 2011 [ | Community-based sample of 243 women (Lisbon, Portugal) that reported vasomotor symptoms in the past month; aged 42–60 years old | Physical exercise was assessed using reported frequency and duration of exercise sessions per week. Summary scores were computed using the mean frequency and duration values | Menopause Symptoms’ Severity Inventory was used to assess the frequency and intensity of night sweats through classification on a 5-point Likert scale which ranged from ‘never’ to ‘daily’ and from ‘not intense’ to ‘extreme intensity’. Severity for each symptom was computed as the mean frequency and intensity values | Socio-demographic characteristics, health and menopausal related variables and lifestyle factors | Physical exercise was not associated with perceived severity of hot flashes or night sweats | x | |||
| Tan et al. 2014 [ | 305 Turkish (District of Izmir) menopausal women who went to their primary care physician between August and October 2009 | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-short version. Women were classified as: low, moderate, or high active | Turkish version of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), which includes 11 items assessing assess somato-vegetative, psychological and urogenital symptoms; scores range from ‘not present’ to ‘very severe’ | Socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, anthropometrics | There was no difference in the reported frequency of hot flashes/night sweating by physical activity groups | x | |||
| Short-term (≤30 days) Longitudinal Studies | |||||||||
| Elavsky et al. 2012 [ | Community-dwelling midlife women ( | To examine the acute effects of PA, participants attended a second visit during week 1, where they completed a 30-min moderate intensity exercise bout. Daily PA was also assessed objectively using an ActiGraph (GT1M) accelerometer placed over the participants’ nondominant hip for 15 consecutive days | Hot flash and night sweat data were collected using Purdue Momentary Assessment platform in which participants self-reported hot flashes and night-sweats in real-time using a personal digital assistant (PDA). Objective data were obtained via skin conductance monitoring (Biolog Hot Flash Monitor), a battery-powered, portable device. Participants wore the monitor for 24 h, twice during data collection. In addition to continuous monitoring, participants were asked to flag perceived events | Basic demographic and health history information. Psychological symptoms through questionnaires | An acute bout of moderate-intensity of aerobic exercise decreases both reported and objective and subjective hot flashes | x | |||
| There was no significant change in night sweats as a result of the acute exercise bout | |||||||||
| Daily physical activity was not associated with reported hot flash frequency. Yet, less fit women reported more hot flashes on days when they engaged in more moderate-intensity physical activity than usual | |||||||||
| The associations between daily PA and night sweats were not reported | |||||||||
| Elavsky et al. 2012 [ | 24 symptomatic peri- and post-menopausal women not on HT were picked from volunteers who responded to advertisements | Participants used accelerometers across a menstrual cycle or for 30 days if postmenopausal. Accelerometer count data were classified as % time sedentary, and in light, moderate and vigorous 2intensity physical activity (Matthews cutpoints) | Daily HFs were reported using an electronic PDA across one menstrual cycle or 30 days | Socio-demographic and health history. Psychosocial questionnaires, including depression, chronic stress, and anxiety. Reproductive hormones via blood draw | The association between physical activity and hot flashes was statistically significant in half the participants ( | x | |||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||||
| Gibson et al. 2014 [ | Analytic sample included Study of Women’s Health across the Nation (SWAN) participants ( | PA was measured using accelerometer-derived activity counts from the Biolog monitor. The mean activity count in the 10 min before a hot flash were classified as “pre-flash” physical activity. The other data were classified as “control” physical activity. Habitual physical activity assessed via the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) | Self-reported hot flashes were assessed using a portable electronic diary. Physiologically detected hot flashes were measured using Biolog sternal skin conductance monitors | Socio-demographic and health behavior information, anthropometrics, depression & anxiety | There was no relationship of daily physical activity with physiologic hot flashes, self-reported hot flashes, or physiologically monitored hot flashes (not confirmed by self-report). Yet, higher habitual PA, higher BMI, more depressive symptoms and anxiety were associated with higher levels of self-reported hot flashes not corroborated by a physiologic hot flash | x | |||
| Gjelsvik et al. 2011 [ | Analytic sample included 2229 women aged 40–44 years, randomly selected from national survey in Hordaland County, Norway. Baseline data were collected in 1997–98 and follow-up occurred every second year and continued to 2010 | A short follow-up questionnaire included items pertaining to physical exercise. Participants were classified as inactive based on <1 h hard activity and/or <2 | A short follow-up questionnaire included items pertaining to the reported frequency (‘daily’ to ‘never/almost never’) and burden (‘very much’ to ‘not bothered’) | Sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, menopausal status and symptoms | When compared to inactive women, women with >3 h of hard exercise per day were 1.5 times (1.1–1.9) more likely to report daily hot flashes | x | |||
| de Azevedo Guimaraes et al. 2011 [ | 120 Brazilian women aged 45–59 years old volunteered for the 12-week study (recruited through work or other institutions) | Habitual PA was assessed through the short form of the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ); Participants were classified as: maintained <30 min/day, maintained or increased to 30–60 min/day, or maintained or increased to >60 min/day | Hot flashes were assessed using the Kupperman Menopausal Index | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and symptoms, and QOL | Women classified in the highest active group (maintained or increased to 60 min per day) had reported significantly fewer hot flashes after 12-weeks than the other two active groups after adjustment for baseline values | x | |||
| 104 women completed the 12-week study. | |||||||||
| Non-randomized intervention studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | The menopause rating scale (MRS) was composed of 11 items assessing menopausal symptoms divided into three groups: psychological, somatic-vegetative and urogenital | Physical characteristics (height, weight, and age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was a significant decrease in hot flushes and night sweats from baseline to 6-months | x | |||
| Randomized controlled trials | |||||||||
| Agil et al. 2010 [ | 42 Turkish postmenopausal women (aged 45–60 years old) who agreed to participate in the 8-week study after presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Bayindir Hospital) between March and December 2009. Participants were randomly assigned to the aerobic or resistance training group | Aerobic and Resistance Groups: Supervised sessions 3 × per week. The resistance group used elastic belt; no other details provided for either group | Vasomotor symptoms were assessed using the Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) | Socio-demographics and health behaviors | Both the aerobic and resistance groups had a significant reduction in vasomotor symptoms following the exercise program. | x | |||
| Luoto et al. 2012 [ | 176 Finnish white women were recruited for the study by newspaper advertisements. The analytic sample included 154 inactive participants were randomly assigned to the exercise ( | Exercise Group: Unsupervised aerobic training intervention; 4 × per week at 64–80 % maximal heart rate for 50 min each time | Hot flashes were assessed via the Women’s Health Questionnaire (primary). Hot flashes were also collected 2 × per day using a mobile phone-administered questionnaire | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, and menopausal symptoms | WHQ assessed hot flashes did not differ by group | x | |||
| There was no group x time differences in daily reported daytime hot flashes. | |||||||||
| Moilanen et al. 2012 [ | 176 Finnish white women were recruited for the study by newspaper advertisements. The analytic sample included 154 inactive participants were randomly assigned to the exercise ( | Exercise Group: Unsupervised aerobic training intervention; 4 × per week at 64–80 % maximal heart rate for 50 min each time | The frequency of night sweats were collected 2 × per day using a mobile phone- administered questionnaire | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, and menopausal symptoms | The prevalence of night sweats decreased pre- to post- intervention | x | |||
| Newton et al. 2014 [ | Women aged 40–62 recruited from 3 sites in US (IN, CA, WA) and randomly assigned to a 12-week yoga ( | Yoga Group: Supervised: 1 × per week for 90 min; Unsupervised: 6 × per week for 20 min | Frequency and intensity of vasomotor were recorded in daily diaries by the participants. VMS bother was rated each day on a scale ranging from 1 ‘none’ to 4 ‘a lot’. Baseline frequency was calculated from the mean number of vasomotor symptoms reported in a 24-h period during the 14 days prior to the 1st visit. Vasomotor frequency during weeks 6 and 12 were computed similarly using the corresponding diaries | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, daily diaries assessing vasomotor symptoms, sleep quality, health history, and anxiety | After 12-weeks, based on intent-to-treat analysis, yoga had no effect on vasomotor frequency or bother when compared to usual activity | x | |||
| Usual Activity: Instructed to follow usual physical activity plan; asked not to initiate yoga or a new exercise regimen. | |||||||||
| Reed et al. 2014 [ | Women aged 40–62 recruited from 3 sites in US (IN, CA, WA) and randomly assigned to a 12-week yoga ( | Yoga Group: Supervised: 1 × per week for 90 min; Unsupervised: 6 × per week for 20 min | Menopausal Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL; range, 1–8) is a 29-item assessment of menopause-related QOL. Total score and 4 domain-specific scores (vasomotor, physical, psychosocial, & sexual functioning). Frequency of vasomotor symptoms were also assessed via daily diaries | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, daily diaries assessing vasomotor symptoms, sleep quality, health history, and anxiety | After 12-weeks, compared to the usual activity group, yoga group participants had significant improvements in vasomotor symptoms (as reported via MENQOL). There was no difference in pre- to post- vasomotor symptoms between the exercise and usual activity groups | x | |||
| Exercise Group: Supervised: 3 × per week, 50–60 % HRR during month 1, 60–70 % HRR during months 2 & 3 | |||||||||
| Usual Activity: Instructed to follow usual physical activity plan; asked not to initiate yoga or a new exercise regimen | |||||||||
| Sternfeld et al. 2014 [ | Women aged 40–62 recruited from 3 sites in US (IN, CA, WA) and randomly assigned to a 12-week yoga ( | Exercise Group: Supervised: 3 × per week, 50–60 % HRR during month 1, 60–70 % HRR during months 2 & 3. Possible modes included, treadmill, elliptical trainer, or stationary bicycle. Trained staff recorded heart rate, workload, and perceived 7 exertion every 5–10 minutes | Frequency and intensity of vasomotor were recorded in daily diaries by the participants. VMS bother was rated each day on a scale ranging from 1 ‘none’ to 4 ‘a lot’. Baseline frequency was calculated from the mean number of vasomotor symptoms reported in a 24-h period during the 14 days prior to the 1st visit. Vasomotor frequency during weeks 6 and 12 were computed similarly using the corresponding diaries | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, daily diaries assessing vasomotor symptoms, sleep quality, health history, and anxiety | After 12-weeks, compared to the usual activity group, exercise group participants had no change in frequency or burden of vasomotor symptom, compared to the usual activity group | x | |||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]
Selected studies of physical activity and vaginal dryness
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Detailed findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||||
| Aydin et al. 2014 [ | 1071 Islamicpostmenopausalwomen (of 1328 women that expressed interest) who attended an outpatient clinic from 2005–12 | Questionnaire included an item on regular exercise, defined as 30-min for ≥2 times per week (yes/no) | Validated questionnaire assessing genitourinary symptoms, including presence or absence of vaginal dryness | Socio-demographics, health behaviors, anthropometrics, length of menopausal status (months) | The prevalence of vaginal dryness was higher in participants reporting regular exercise | x | |||
| Tan et al. 2014 [ | 305 Turkish (District of Izmir) menopausal women who went to their primary care physician between August and October 2009 | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-short version. Women were classified as: low, moderate, or high active | Turkish version of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), which includes 11 items assessing assess somato-vegetative, psychological and urogenital symptoms; scores range from ‘not present’ to ‘very severe’ | Socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, anthropometrics | High active women had a lower prevalence of vaginal dryness symptoms than low and moderate active women | x | |||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||||
| de Azevedo Guimaraes et al. 2011 [ | 120 Brazilianwomen aged45–59 years oldvolunteered for the 12-week study(recruited throughwork or other institutions) | Habitual PA was assessed through the short form of the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ); Participants were classified as: maintained <30 min/day, maintained or increased to 30–60 min/day, or maintained or increased to >60 min/day | Vaginal dryness was assessed using the Kupperman Menopausal Index | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and symptoms, and QOL | There was no difference in reported vaginal dryness by activity group | x | |||
| 104 women completed the 12-week study | |||||||||
| Non-randomized intervention studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | The menopause rating scale (MRS) was composed of 11 items assessing menopausal symptoms divided into three groups: psychological, somatic-vegetative and urogenital | Physical characteristics (height, weight, and age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was no pre- to post- exercise program difference in vaginal dryness | x | |||
| Randomized controlled trials | |||||||||
| Moilanen et al. 2012 [ | 176 Finnish white women were recruited for the study by newspaper advertisements. The analytic sample included 154 inactive participants were randomly assigned to the exercise ( | Exercise Group: Unsupervised aerobic training intervention; 4 × per week at 64–80 % maximal heart rate for 50 min each time | The presence of vaginal dryness were collected 2 × per day using a mobile phone- administered questionnaire | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, and menopausal symptoms | The prevalence of vaginal dryness decreased pre- to post- intervention | x | |||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]
Selected studies of physical activity and urinary incontinence
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Main findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||||
| Aydin et al. 2014 [ | 1071 Islamic postmenopausal women (of 1328 women that expressed interest) who attended an outpatient clinic from 2005–12 | Questionnaire included an item on regular exercise, defined as 30-min for ≥2 times per week (yes/no) | Validated questionnaire assessing genitourinary symptoms, including presence or absence of urinary symptoms (dysuria, frequency, urgency, nocturia, and incontinence) | Sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, anthropometrics, length of menopausal status (months) | There was no significant difference in urinary symptoms in regular exercisers versus non-exercisers | x | |||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||||
| de Azevedo Guimaraes et al. 2011 [ | 120 Brazilian women aged 45–59 years old volunteered for the 12-week study (recruited through work or other institutions) | Habitual PA was assessed through the short form of the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ); Participants were classified as: maintained <30 min/day, maintained or increased to 30–60 min/day, or maintained or increased to >60 min/day | Urinary complaints (exertion-induced urinary incontinence or difficult micturition) assessed using the Kupperman Menopausal Index | Sociodemographic factors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and symptoms, and QOL | Women classified in the highest active group (maintained or increased to 60 min per day) had reported significantly less instances of leaking urine | x | |||
| 104 women completed the 12-week study | |||||||||
| Non-randomized intervention studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | The menopause rating scale (MRS) was composed of 11 items assessing menopausal symptoms divided into three groups: psychological, somatic-vegetative and urogenital | Physical characteristics (height, weight, and age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was a significant reduction in urinary symptoms from baseline to 6-months | x | |||
| Randomized controlled studies | |||||||||
| Moilanen et al. 2012 [ | 176 Finnish white women were recruited for the study by newspaper advertisements. The analytic sample included 154 inactive participants were randomly assigned to the exercise ( | Exercise Group: Unsupervised aerobic training intervention; 4 × per week at 64-80 % maximal heart rate for 50 min each time | The frequency of urinary symptoms were collected 2 × per day using a mobile phone- administered questionnaire | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, and menopausal symptoms | There was no change in urinary symptoms as a result of the exercise intervention | x | |||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]
Selected studies of physical activity and sleep quality and/or sleep disturbances
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Detailed findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||||
| Canário et al. 2012 [ | Population-based sample of 370 women from Natal, Brazil aged 40–65 | International Physical Activity Questionnaire with three categories of classification: sedentary, moderately active and very active (vigorous) | Blatt–Kupperman Menopausal Index with three categories of classification: mild (≤19), moderate (20–35), or severe (>35) | Socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics | Bivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant inverse association between physical activity and insomnia | x (insomnia) | |||
| Casas et al. 2012 [ | 48 month follow-up data from the Women on the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) Study. The analytic sample included 393 postmenopausal women, aged 62 ± 3 years | Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (past year version). Participants were also classified as high or low active based on sample-determined median (11.8 MET⋅hr⋅wk−1) | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, hormone therapy status, cardiovascular risk factors | Bivariate analysis suggest that sleep quality and duration did not vary in participants classified as high vs. low active | x (sleep quality & duration) | |||
| Lambiase et al. 2013 [ | Sub-sample of 52 Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) participants (Pittsburgh site only) attending the 10th annual visit (2008–09) | Kaiser Physical Activity Survey, including four indices of physical activity: (a) household/ caregiving, (b) occupational, (c) active living, and (d) sport/exercise activity. Each index was calculated as the average score (ranged from 1 to 5) | Minimitter Actiwatch-64 (dominant wrist) and sleep diary. In the diary, participants reported times in and out of bed and number of awakenings | Demographic factors, medical history, medication use, and health behaviors | Participants with higher physical activity levels reported better sleep quality and recorded fewer nighttime awakenings | x | |||
| Participants were also asked to report their global sleep quality in the past month on a 4-point scale (very bad to very good) | Reported physical activity was not significantly associated with objectively-determined sleep estimates | ||||||||
| Kline et al. 2013 [ | 339 participants from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Sleep Study, an ancillary study located at 4 of 7 SWAN clinical sites (Chicago, IL; Detroit Area, MI; Oakland, CA; Pittsburgh, PA). Data were collected from 2003–05 | Kaiser Physical Activity Survey, including four indices of physical activity: (a) household/ caregiving, (b) occupational, (c) active living, and (d) sport/exercise activity. Each index was calculated as the average score (ranged from 1 to 5). Recent (KPAS scores from preceding SWAN visit) and historical (2–4 KPAS assessments in the 5–6 years prior to the SWAN Sleep Study) physical activity estimates were created. Participants were further classified as, “consistently active”, “inconsistent/ moderate” or “consistently inactive” based on the historical estimates | In-home polysomnography (PSG), daily sleep diaries, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Sociodemographic factors, medication use, menopausal status, vasomotor symptoms and other health behaviors | Higher sports/exercise index scores were significantly related with greater sleep quality and continuity (via diary) and greater sleep depth (PSG). Those with a higher sports/exercise index had a significantly lower odds of meeting diagnostic criteria for insomnia. The associations with the household or active living index were not statistically significant | x (sleep quality) | |||
| Mansikkamäki et al. 2015 [ | Random sample of 5000 women born in 1963 was obtained from the Finnish Population Register Centre. Analytic sample included 2606 women aged 49 years old that responded to a postal survey in 2012 | A single item pertaining to usual exercise (frequency and duration) per week during past 12-months. Women were classified as ‘active’ if they reported ≥ 150 min per week of moderate intensity or ≥75 min of vigorous intensity, with strength training and balance training | Women’s Health Questionnaire addressing nine domains of physical and emotional experiences, including sleep problems | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, self-rated health | There was no difference in reported sleep problems in active vs. inactive | x (sleep problems) | |||
| Non-randomized intervention studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | The menopause rating scale (MRS) was composed of 11 items assessing menopausal symptoms divided into three groups: psychological, somatic-vegetative and urogenital | Physical characteristics (height, weight, and age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was a significant decrease in reported sleeping problems from baseline to 3- and 6-months | x (sleep problems) | |||
| Randomized controlled studies | |||||||||
| Kline et al. 2012 [ | 437 sedentary, overweight/obese participants from the Dose–response to Exercise in postmenopausal Women (DREW) Study, randomized to no exercise ( | Exercise Training Groups: The supervised exercise program (3–4 times per week) included aerobic activity at varying doses (i.e., 4-, 8-, or 12- kcal per kilogram of body weight per week (KKW). For the 1st week all exercise training groups expended 4 KKW. Then, the 8- and 12- KKW groups increased energy expenditure by 1 KKW until they reached the appointed dose | Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale was used to assess sleep quality during the previous 4-weeks. A modified Sleep Problems Index (SPI) was also used to assess overall sleep quality. SPI scores >25 were used to indicate significant sleep disturbance | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometric measures, medication use, health behaviors, diet, cardiorespiratory fitness, heart rate variability | After adjustment: (1) a significant effect of the intervention was found with reported sleep quality, (2) a linear dose–response effect was found with reported sleep quality across treatment groups, (3) compared to the control group, the exercise groups all had a lower odds of having significant sleep disturbance, and (4) the odds of having significant sleep disturbance decreased across increasing exercise doses | x (sleep quality) | x (sleep disturbances) | ||
| Mansikkamäki et al. 2012 [ | 176 inactive women, aged 40–63 years with no current or recent (<3 months) hormone therapy use, and 6 to 36 months since last menstruation | Exercise Program: aerobic training, 4 times per week for 50 min each time for 6-months. Participants were asked to include at least 2 sessions of walking or Nordic walking per week | Reported sleep was obtained via 1-item included on a mobile phone administered questionnaire. Participants responded to the question, “how well did you sleep last night” via 5 response options ranging from poor to good | Socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, anthropometrics | Sleep quality improved significantly more in the exercise vs. control group. The odds for sleep improvement were 2 % in the exercise group compared to −0.5 % in the control group. Women randomized to the intervention also reported significantly fewer hot flushes disturbing their sleep than the control group | x (sleep quality) | |||
| Sternfeld et al. 2014 [ | Women aged 40–62 recruited from 3 sites in US (IN, CA, WA) and randomly assigned to a 12-week yoga ( | Exercise Group: Supervised: 3 × per week, 50–60 % HRR during month 1, 60–70 % HRR during months 2 & 3. Possible modes included, treadmill, elliptical trainer, or stationary bicycle. Trained staff recorded heart rate, workload, and perceived exertion every 5–10 min | Sleep quality and sleep disturbances were ascertained via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and insomnia symptoms were collected using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, daily diaries assessing vasomotor symptoms, health history, and anxiety | After 12-weeks, compared to the usual activity group, exercise group participants reported greater improvement in sleep quality and insomnia symptoms | x (sleep quality) | x (insomnia symptoms) | ||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]
Selected studies of physical activity and psychological symptoms
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Detailed findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||||
| Canário et al. 2012 [ | Population-based sample of 370 women from Natal, Brazil aged 40–65 | International Physical Activity Questionnaire with three categories of classification: sedentary, moderately active and very active (vigorous) | Blatt–Kupperman Menopausal Index with three categories of classification: mild (≤19), moderate (20–35), or severe (>35) | Socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics | Bivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant inverse association between physical activity and depression | x (depression) | |||
| Mansikkamäki et al. 2015 [ | Random sample of 5000 women born in 1963 was obtained from the Finnish Population Register Centre, 2606 women aged 49 years old responded that responded to a postal survey in 2012 | A single item pertaining to usual exercise (frequency and duration) per week during past 12-months. Women were classified as ‘active’ if they reported ≥ 150 min per week of moderate intensity or ≥75 min of vigorous intensity, with strength training and balance training | Women’s Health Questionnaire addressing nine domains of physical and emotional experiences, including anxiety/depressed mood | Sociodemographic factors, anthropometrics, self-rated health | In the unadjusted and adjusted models, inactive women had a statistically significant increased probability of anxiety/ depression [Unadjusted POR: 1.44 (95 % CI: 1.26, 1.65); Adjusted POR: 1.31 (95 % CI: 1.14, 1.51) | x (anxiety, depression) | |||
| Moilanen et al. 2010 [ | Participants drawn from Finnish Health 2000 Study ( | Physical activity was assessed via a single item on the questionnaire, “How much do you exercise or strain yourself physically in your leisure time” with four response options ranging from ‘sedentary’ (reading, watching television) to ‘competitive sports’. Participants were classified based on low, moderate, and high physical activity | Severity of general symptoms, including psychological symptoms (e.g., depression), were assessed via two items on the questionnaire | Socio-demographics, health behaviors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and hormone therapy use | Compared to the high active group, low active women were significantly more likely to report psychological symptoms | x (psychological symptoms) | |||
| Timur et al. 2010 [ | Community-based randomly selected sample of 685 Turkish (Malatya) women aged 45–59 years. Data were collected from February to May, 2008 | A single item to assess regular exercise, operationalized as:≥3 times per week or not (yes or no) | The Beck Depression Inventory, a 21 question survey that uses a Likert scale from 0 to 3 to assess severity of depressive symptoms | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, health behaviors, parity, menopausal status and hormone therapy use | No significant difference in depression by regular exercise status | x | |||
| Vallance et al. 2010 [ | 297 post-menopausal women from the Palliser Region of Alberta, Canada | Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire which assesses the frequency and duration of mild-, moderate-, and strenuous- leisure-time physical activity | Depression was assess via the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. For each item, responses ranged from 0 ‘<1 day in the past week’ to 3 ‘5-7 days in the past week’ | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, health history, menopausal symptoms | Unadjusted and adjusted analyses found that participants meeting physical activity recommendations reported significantly fewer depression symptoms than those who did not | x (depression symptoms) | |||
| Participants also wore a pedometer (DigiWalker SC-01) for 3 days, average steps per day were computed | Anxiety was assessed via the 10-item Spielberger’s state Anxiety Inventory (SAI). For each item, responses ranged from 1 ‘not all’ to 4 ‘very much so’ | ||||||||
| Estimates reflecting meeting physical activity recommendations were also computed for both reported and pedometer-based (>7500 steps per day) estimates. | |||||||||
| Chang et al. 2013 [ | Secondary data analysis of 481 multi-racial/ethnic women who completed questions on menopausal symptoms that were part of a larger Internet survey study | Kaiser Physical Activity Survey, including four indices of physical activity: (a) household/ caregiving, (b) occupational, (c) active living, and (d) sport/exercise activity. Each index was calculated as the average score (ranged from 1 to 5) | Midlife women’s Symptoms Index, which measured psychological symptoms based on their prevalence ‘yes’ or ‘no’ and severity ‘1 = not at all and 5 = extremely’ | Sociodemographic factors, self-rated health, menopausal status, hormone therapy use | After adjustment, there was a statistically significant association between the household/ caregiving index and psychological symptoms in Non-Hispanic Asians and Blacks, only. Associations were not statistically significant for any other race/ethnic group or indices of physical activity | x | |||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||||
| Dugan et al. 2015 [ | Included 2891 participants from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Women were recruited in 1995–97. Included data from follow-up, 3, 6 & 9 | Kaiser Physical Activity Survey, including four indices of physical activity: (a) household/ caregiving, (b) occupational, (c) active living, and (d) sport/exercise activity. Each index was calculated as the average score (ranged from 1 to 5). Participants were then classified as: meeting physical activity guidelines, below physical activity guidelines or Inactive | Depression was assess via the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. For each item, responses ranged from 0 ‘<1 day in the past week’ to 3 ‘5–7 days in the past week’. High depressive symptoms were classified as ≥16 | Socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, anthropometrics, menopausal status, hormone therapy use, antidepressant medication use | After adjustment for covariates, participants classified as ‘meeting physical activity guidelines’ or ‘below guidelines’ had a significantly lower odds for depressive symptoms than those classified as inactive. This association persisted over 10 years of observation | x (depressive symptoms) | |||
| de Azevedo Guimaraes et al. 2011 [ | 120 Brazilian women aged 45–59 years old volunteered for the 12-week study (recruited through work or other institutions) | Habitual PA was assessed through the short form of the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ); Participants were classified as: maintained <30 min/day, maintained or increased to 30–60 min/day, or maintained or increased to >60 min/day | Psychological symptoms were assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version Questionnaire; higher scores reflect less severe psychological symptoms | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, menopausal status and symptoms, and QOL | Women classified in the highest active group (maintained or increased to 60 min per day) had increased psychological domain QOL scores after 12-weeks than the other two active groups after adjustment for baseline values | x (better psycho-social symptoms) | |||
| 104 women completed the 12-week study | |||||||||
| Non-randomized Intervention Studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | The menopause rating scale (MRS) was composed of 11 items assessing menopausal symptoms divided into three groups: psychological, somatic-vegetative and urogenital | Physical characteristics (height, weight, and age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was a significant reduction in psychological symptoms, including depressive mood, irritability, and anxiety after 3- and 6-months of the exercise program. Reported exhaustion also significantly decreased from baseline to 3- and baseline to 6- months | x (psychosocial symptoms) | |||
| Randomized Controlled Studies | |||||||||
| Agil et al. 2010 [ | 42 Turkish, postmenopausal women aged 45–60 years old, presented to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Bayindir Hospital between March and December 2009 and volunteered to participate in an 8-week physical activity intervention. The analytic sample included 36 participants; intent to treat analysis was not done | Participants were randomly assigned to either an aerobic ( | Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) assessed psychological symptoms, the Beck Depressive Inventory (BDI) was used to assess depressive symptoms | Socio-demographic factors, health behaviors | Psychological symptoms decreased significantly in both groups post exercise programs according to the MRS subscale. The BDI showed a decrease in depressive symptoms for both groups, but was higher in the resistance exercise group than the aerobic exercise group | x (psychosocial symptoms) | |||
| Moilanen et al. 2012 [ | 176 Finnish white women were recruited for the study by newspaper advertisements. The analytic sample included 154 inactive participants were randomly assigned to the exercise ( | Exercise Group: Unsupervised aerobic training intervention; 4 × per week at 64–80 % maximal heart rate for 50 min each time | The frequency of psychological symptoms (i.e., mood swings, depressive moods, irritability) were collected 2 × per day using a mobile phone- administered questionnaire | Socio-demographic factors, anthropometrics, and menopausal symptoms | The prevalence of mood-swings decreased pre- to post- intervention. No other reductions were noted | x | |||
| Sternfeld et al. 2014 [ | 248 women aged 40–62 recruited from 3 sites in US (IN, CA, WA) and randomly assigned to a 12-week yoga ( | Exercise Group: Supervised: 3 × per week, 50–60 % HRR during month 1, 60–70 % HRR during months 2 & 3. Possible modes included, treadmill, elliptical trainer, or stationary bicycle. Trained staff recorded heart rate, workload, and perceived exertion every 5–10 min | Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) and anxiety symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) | Socio-demographics, anthropometrics, daily diaries assessing vasomotor symptoms, sleep quality, and health history | Compared to the usual activity group, the exercise group had a greater decrease in depressive symptoms ( | x | |||
| Villaverde Gutiérrez et al. 2012 [ | 330 postmenopausal women, aged 60–70, were recruited from a healthcare clinic in Granada, Spain. Of those, 60 (19.1 %) meet eligibility criteria and were willing to participate. Women were randomly selected to the exercise ( | Exercise group: During the first 8 weeks of the supervised program, 2 × per week, 50 min each time, 50–70 % heart rate reserve. During weeks 8–12, 3 × per week, 60 min each time, 50–70 % heart rate reserve and muscle training exercises were added. Weeks 12–24, intensity was increased to 60–85 % heart rate reserve; all other components were similar to weeks 8–12 | Depressive symptoms were assessed via the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Participants were classified as: moderate depression (11–14) or severe depression (15–30). Anxiety was assessed via the 14-itemHamilton Anxiety Scale (HRSA). Responses ranged from 0 ‘absence of symptoms’ to 4 ‘total incapacitated’. Participants were classified as: minor anxiety (6–15) or major anxiety (>15) | Anthropometrics | Unadjusted results suggest that among the exercise group, women initially classified with moderate or severe depression had significantly reduced depressive symptoms after 6-months. Similarly, participants in the exercise group, classified with minor or major anxiety had significantly reduced anxiety symptoms after 6-months. In the Control group, women initially classified with moderate depression had a slight increase in depressive symptoms after 6 months. This slight increase was also shown in the control group among participants initially classified with minor anxiety | x (severe depression, depressive symptoms & anxiety) | |||
| Control group: Received no exercise treatment | |||||||||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]
Selected studies of physical activity and weight gain
| Reference | Sample | Physical activity measure | Menopausal symptom measure | Other measures | Detailed findings | Summarized findings: observed association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null | Positive | Negative | Mixed | ||||||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||||
| Choi et al. 2012 [ | 346 women, aged 40–50 years with regular menstrual cycles were enrolled in the Biobehavioral Health in Diverse Midlife Women Study in 1996–1997. The analytic sample included 232 pre ( | Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed every 6-months for 2 years. Leisure time physical activity estimates are MET · hr · wk−1 and are computed as the product of the duration and frequency, weighted by the corresponding MET value for each reported activity. After 2-years, change physical activity status was classified as: increase (≥300 MET · hr · wk−1), maintain (−300 to 300 MET · hr · wk−1), or decrease (<300 MET · hr · wk−1) | Trained study staff measured body weight (via electronic scale) and waist circumference (specialized tape to the nearest 0.1 cm), every 6 months | Sociodemographic factors and Menopausal status (via urinary levels of FSH) | Unadjusted results suggest that after 2-years, participants who maintained their physical activity had an average weight gain of 3.3 ± 12.2 lbs. Participants who decreased physical activity gained the most weight over time 5.3 ± 8.9 lbs. Participants who increased physical activity gained the least amount of weight 0.8 ± 12.2 lbs. Similar group differences were also shown for waist circumference. Compared to those who decreased physical activity over time, those that increased physical activity had statistically significant less weight gain ( | x | |||
| Lusk et al. 2010 [ | 18,414 Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) II participants, recruited in 1989. Follow-up questionnaires including physical activity and body weight were completed every 2-years. The analytic sample participants who were premenopausal through 2005 and completed the 1989 and 2005 questionnaires | The NHS II Physical Activity Questionnaire includes reported frequency and duration (10 response options from ‘zero’ to ‘≥11 h per week’ of 9 specific activity types over the past year. Usual walking pace was also reported (responses range from ‘unable to walk’ to ‘very brisk (≥4 miles per hour). Average number of flights of stairs climbed daily were also reported. Inactivity via reported sitting time was also assessed | Height and weight were participant reported On the baseline and follow-up questionnaires. BMI was computed from these self-reported values | Socio-demographic factors, dietary patterns (i.e., sugar-sweetened beverages, trans-fats, and dietary fiber), health behaviors, parity, oral contraceptive use, antidepressant use | A 30 min per day increase in overall physical activity levels between 1989 and 2005 was associated with less weight gain [−1.31 kg (95 % CI: −1.44, −1.18)]. A 30 min increase in brisk walking and bicycling, specifically, was associated with less weight gain [−1.81 kg (95 % CI: −2.05, −1.56) and −1.59 kg (95 % CI: −2.09, −1.08), respectively]. Further, women that reported no bicycling in 1989 and increased to ≥5 min per day in 2005, gained significantly less weight [−0.74 (95 % CI: −1.41, −0.07)] than those who reported no bicycling in 2005 | x | |||
| Sims et al. 2012 [ | Participants were drawn from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Study (40 clinical sites) and included 58,610 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years old that took part in either the diet modification or hormone therapy arms. Participants enrolled in 1993–98 and were followed annually for 8 years | The WHI Physical Activity Questionnaire includes reported frequency and duration within moderate- and strenuous- physical activity categories. Walking was also assessed. Participants were further classified into four groups: sedentary (≤100 MET · hr · wk−1), low activity (>100 to 500 MET · hr · wk−1), moderate activity (>500 to 1200 MET · hr · wk−1), and high activity (≥1200 MET · hr · wk−1) | Trained clinical staff measured body weight and height with a calibrated balance beam or digital scale and a wall-mounted stadiometer. BMI was calculated from these measures. Waist (midpoint between last floating rib and upper part of the iliac crest at the end of expiration)-to-hip (maximum extension of the buttocks) ratio (WHR) was also measured using a conventional measuring tape | Sociodemographic factors, dietary intake, smoking, alcohol, hormone use, and sleep | In the fully adjusted models, in the 50–59 year age group, women in the moderate activity group experienced a significant weight loss [−0.30 (95 % CI: −0.53, −0.07) compared to the sedentary group. In women aged 70–79 years, higher physical activity was significantly associated with less weight loss [0.34 (95 % CI: 0.04, 0.63) | x | |||
| Non-randomized intervention studies | |||||||||
| Karacan, 2010 [ | 112 women aged 46–55. The analytic sample included 65 participants that regularly participated in the 3- and 6-month exercise program | The 6-month exercise program included aerobic activity (75–80 % heart rate capacity) with calisthenics for 3 days a week for 55 min each session | Height and weight were assessed with a metal meter and scale; BMI was also computed. Body fat percentage was also measured via skinfold calipers using the Sloan and Weir formula (triceps and suprailiac) | Menopausal symptoms, physical characteristics (age at menopause), resting heart rate and blood pressure, lower back flexibility, hand grip strength, and body composition (skin folds) | There was a significant decrease in body weight, BMI, and body fat percentage from baseline to 6-months | x | |||
aPhysical activity dose reflective of 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans [3]