Literature DB >> 30766633

Present trends in bariatric surgery in Poland.

Maciej Walędziak1, Anna M Różańska-Walędziak2, Piotr K Kowalewski1, Michal R Janik1, Jakub Brągoszewski1, Krzysztof Paśnik1, Grzegorz Bednarczyk3, Grzegorz Wallner4, Maciej Matłok3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As obesity has become a major health problem in Poland and bariatric procedures are the best way of treatment, an increasing trend has been observed in Polish bariatric surgery for the last decade. AIM: Our purpose was to provide an updated overview of the bariatric surgical procedures performed in Polish institutions in comparison to the situation in Europe as well as to analyze the trends in Polish bariatric surgery over the last decades.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire about the number and type of bariatric procedures performed in 2016 was sent to all Polish surgical departments. Two hundred and sixty surgical departments returned the questionnaires.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven departments reported having performed bariatric operative or endoscopic procedures in 2016. The total number of procedures reported was 1958, the most popular being the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). More than 99% of procedures were performed using laparoscopic techniques. The most common operations were: LSG (64.6%, n = 1032) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) (18.2%; n = 291), followed by one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (8.3%; n = 132) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) (7.3%; n = 117).
CONCLUSIONS: Registers of bariatric procedures provide information that helps in planning treatment and predicting possible complications. Adequate reporting of bariatric procedures is necessary to present the importance of the high incidence of obesity and the importance of its treatment. To collect reliable data, a national Polish bariatric surgery registry should be created.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bariatric/metabolic surgery; endoluminal procedures; obesity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30766633      PMCID: PMC6372871          DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.77707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne        ISSN: 1895-4588            Impact factor:   1.195


Introduction

According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) data from 2016, 39.3% of adults in Poland are overweight and 23.1% are obese. The percentage of the overweight and obese population in Poland has doubled over the last 40 years, similarly to other developed countries [1]. According to the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO), over 600 000 procedures were performed in 2014 in the 56 countries that are members of the IFSO, 20 of which have national bariatric registers. Since a Polish registry is currently under development, the collected data need to be based on voluntary questionnaires. As Polish bariatric surgery surveys results were previously published in 2007 by Janik et al. [2] and in 2015 by Stanowski et al. [3], we wanted to present the most recent results of the survey from Polish bariatric centers as the data regarding Poland in the latest IFSO report seem to be inaccurate.

Aim

Our purpose was to report an updated overview of the bariatric surgical procedures performed in Polish institutions in comparison to the situation in Europe as well as to analyze the trends in bariatric surgery over the last decades. We also tried to investigate whether the Polish trends are similar to the global ones.

Material and methods

A questionnaire evaluating the number and characteristics of bariatric procedures performed in 2016 was sent to all Polish surgical departments. Two hundred and sixty surgical departments returned the questionnaires, 27 of which reported having performed bariatric operative or endoscopic procedures in 2016.

Results

The total number of bariatric procedures performed in Poland in 2016 included 1958 operations and 49 endoscopic procedures. Due to incoherence in the reports, only 1597 procedures could be classified, since 361 had been reported as unknown type (18.4%). Among 82.5%, the most common operations were: LSG (64.6%, n = 1032) and LRYGB (18.2%; n = 291), followed by one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (8.3%; n = 132) and LAGB (7.3%; n = 117). According to the data gathered, the number of open approach bariatric procedures has been decreasing, although it is still performed, as 12 (0.7%) cases of RYGB were reported. Among the remaining 13 (0.8%) procedures, there were 3 cases of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) (0.2%, n = 3), for the first time reported in the Polish survey (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Percentage of surgical procedures performed in Poland in 2016

Percentage of surgical procedures performed in Poland in 2016 Thirteen centers reported performing more than 50 bariatric procedures a year, 4 between 100 and 200, and two departments (Warsaw and Gdansk) performed more than 300 operations. In these two main bariatric centers, the most common operation was sleeve gastrectomy (accordingly 57% and 55%). Among 21 surgical departments that had presented the distribution of their operations, 18 centers reported performing LSG and 10 LRYGB. Two bariatric centers performed MGB, another two LAGB, and only one center SADI. Four departments perform endoscopic procedures. Two departments reported open approach bariatric operations.

Discussion

High effectiveness and safety of bariatric procedures positively influence the patients’ quality of life [4-7]. The implementation of the ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery [8] helped to increase the popularity of surgical treatment of obesity, which is the trend presented in our survey. The number of bariatric procedures in Poland continues to increase every year, from 176 in 2007, 841 in 2012, 1499 in 2014, up to 1958 procedures in 2016 [2, 3] (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The number of bariatric procedures in Poland in 2007–2016

The number of bariatric procedures in Poland in 2007–2016 Laparoscopy, which tends to be a method of choice in bariatric surgery, dominates, with more than 99% of procedures. Open surgery constitutes less than 1% of all operations, which is in accordance with the global trend, as stated by the IFSO report from 2017 (Third IFSO Global Registry Report 2017), 98.8% of bariatric procedures having been performed by laparoscopy [9]. There were 49 procedures performed with endoscopic techniques, for the first time reported by any Polish bariatric centers. According to Żurawiński et al., endoscopic intragastric balloon implantation is an effective and safe method of excess body mass reduction in patients with morbid obesity before a planned bariatric surgical procedure [10]. The decreasing trend in open bariatric surgery had already been observed by Janik et al. [2]. In 2008, 106 out of 273 bariatric procedures (38.8%) were open abdominal operations, compared to 3.6% in 2014 and less than 1% in 2016 (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Trends in bariatric surgery in Poland in 2017–2016

Trends in bariatric surgery in Poland in 2017–2016 Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy continues to outnumber the rest of procedures with 879 (58.6%) procedures in 2014 and 1032 (64.6%) in 2016 and remains the most popular bariatric procedure in Poland. The percentage of LRYGB operations has not changed – 18.5% in 2014 and 18.2% in 2016. According to the survey presented by Janik et al., there was an increasing tendency in the number of LAGB procedures from 2010 to 2014, when 114 (7%) LAGB operations were performed. The 2016 survey presents a stable number of 117 (7%) reported LAGB procedures, despite poor long-term outcomes reported by the Polish bariatric centers [11, 12] (Figure 3). Polish trends tend to be similar to international ones. According to the 2014 survey, the results of which were published by Angrisani et al., sleeve gastrectomy was the most common bariatric procedure in the world [13]. Sleeve gastrectomy constituted 45.9% of the bariatric operations in the world in 2014 compared to 58.6% in 2014 and 64.6% in 2016 in Poland. 39.6% of operations worldwide were LRYGB, whereas in Poland the percentage was only 18.5% in 2014 and 18.2% in 2016. Nevertheless, the annual percentage of sleeve gastrectomies continues to increase in the IFSO regions and in Poland. The major limitation of this study was the problem with gathering reliable data. Several surgical departments did not follow the principles of the questionnaire and they did not report the precise numbers of procedures performed. Out of 1958 operations, only 1597 were included in the study, since 361 (18.4%) procedures had been reported without a declared type. This could be omitted in future surveys if a national registry of bariatric operations is created. There have been many attempts to create such a registry that would allow gathering of reliable data about types of operations, bariatric surgeons and complications, but unfortunately none of them has been successful so far in Poland. Only 259 bariatric procedures performed by 3 Polish surgical centers were reported to the IFSO register of more than 200 000 operations performed globally from 2013 to 2017 [9].

Conclusions

Registers of bariatric procedures provide information that helps in planning treatment and predicting possible complications. Adequate reporting of bariatric procedures is necessary to present the importance of the high incidence of obesity and the importance of its treatment. To collect reliable data, a national Polish bariatric surgery registry should be created.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  10 in total

1.  Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.

Authors:  L Angrisani; A Santonicola; P Iovino; G Formisano; H Buchwald; N Scopinaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Piotr Major; Maciej Matłok; Michał Pędziwiatr; Marcin Migaczewski; Piotr Budzyński; Maciej Stanek; Michał Kisielewski; Michał Natkaniec; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Quality of Life and Bariatric Surgery: Cross-Sectional Study and Analysis of Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Michał Robert Janik; Tomasz Rogula; Ilona Bielecka; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Present status of bariatric surgery in Poland.

Authors:  Michał R Janik; Edward Stanowski; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piotr K Kowalewski; Robert Olszewski; Maciej S Walędziak; Michał R Janik; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Natalia Gałązka-Świderek; Krzysztof Cichoń; Jakub Brągoszewski; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Life with a Gastric Band. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piotr K Kowalewski; Robert Olszewski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Natalia Gałązka-Świderek; Krzysztof Cichoń; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Evaluation of the results of treatment of morbid obesity by the endoscopic intragastric balloon implantation method.

Authors:  Wojciech Żurawiński; Dariusz Sokołowski; Karolina Krupa-Kotara; Elżbieta Czech; Krystyn Sosada
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Revisional bariatric surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - a single-center, long-term retrospective study.

Authors:  Piotr K Kowalewski; Robert Olszewski; Andrzej P Kwiatkowski; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the management of patients with morbid obesity.

Authors:  Rafał Paluszkiewicz; Piotr Kalinowski; Tadeusz Wróblewski; Zbigniew Bartoszewicz; Janina Białobrzeska-Paluszkiewicz; Bogna Ziarkiewicz-Wróblewska; Piotr Remiszewski; Mariusz Grodzicki; Marek Krawczyk
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Postoperative Care and Functional Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Among Patients Under ERAS Protocol.

Authors:  Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Jan Witowski; Jan Kulawik; Mateusz Wierdak; Magdalena Pisarska; Michał Pędziwiatr; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.129

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Setting realistic expectations for weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Michal R Janik; Tomasz G Rogula; Rami R Mustafa; Adel Alhaj Saleh; Mujjahid Abbas; Leena Khaitan
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 2.  Pregnancy after bariatric surgery - a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Anna Różańska-Walędziak; Paweł Bartnik; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Maciej Walędziak; Andrzej Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on bariatric care in Poland: results of national survey.

Authors:  Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Małczak; Anna Rzepa; Monika Proczko-Stepaniak; Jacek Szeliga; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  The influence of gestational weight gain after bariatric procedures on selected pregnancy outcomes: a single center study.

Authors:  Maciej Walędziak; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Paweł Bartnik; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Anna Różańska-Walędziak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The impact of the last ten minutes of surgery on hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Case-control study.

Authors:  Michał R Janik; Mateusz Czado; Konrad Kosiński; Szymon Grochans; Maciej Walędziak; Piotr Kowalewski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Quality of Life 10 Years After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Błażej Dziurowicz; Joanna Radwan; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Małczak; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Is it possible to improve long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with appropriate patient selection?

Authors:  Michał Orłowski; Michał Janik; Paula Franczak; Agata Frask; Maciej Michalik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Challenges associated with bariatric surgery - a multi-center report.

Authors:  Tomasz Stefura; Oksana Skomarovska; Michał Wysocki; Michał Janik; Marta Krzysztofik; Maciej Walędziak; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Kowalewski; Piotr Małczak; Katarzyna Bartosiak; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Michał Orłowski; Maciej Matłok; Mateusz Wierdak; Katarzyna Major; Piotr Myśliwiec; Jacek Szeliga; Andrzej Budzyński; Piotr Major
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Type 2 Diabetes Remission 5 Years After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Magdalena Mizera; Michał Wysocki; Katarzyna Bartosiak; Paula Franczak; Hady Razak Hady; Piotr Kalinowski; Piotr Myśliwiec; Michał Orłowski; Rafał Paluszkiewicz; Jerzy Piecuch; Jacek Szeliga; Maciej Walędziak; Piotr Major; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Differences in Compositions of Oral and Fecal Microbiota between Patients with Obesity and Controls.

Authors:  Tomasz Stefura; Barbara Zapała; Tomasz Gosiewski; Oksana Skomarovska; Alicja Dudek; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.