Literature DB >> 30766574

Ethnobotanical study of curative plants used by traditional healers to treat rhinitis in the Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Sebua Silas Semenya1,2, Alfred Maroyi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies focusing on plants used medicinally to heal and manage rhinitis are very scarce in Africa and elsewhere.
OBJECTIVES: To document plants used by traditional healers (THs) in the treatment and management of rhinitis and related symptoms in the Limpopo Province of South Africa.
METHODS: Data was gathered using a semi structured interviews with 105 THs in the Limpopo Province, supplemented by field expeditions for plant specimen collection and observation.
RESULTS: 63 plant species from 59 genera distributed across 40 botanical families, mainly the Asteraceae (7 spp.) and Euphorbiaceae (6 spp.) were therapeutically used by THs. Overall, 77 herbal recipes (87%=mono and 12.9%=poly), mainly prepared from roots (55.5%) and leaves (19%) were recorded. Most of these recipes were processed via pounding (59.7%) and boiling (20.7%). Oral (44.1%) and nasal (33.7%) was the preferred modes of dispensing remedies by THs. Artemisia afra, Clerodendrum ternatum, Cryptocarya transvaalensis, Enicostema axillare, Kalanchoe brachyloba, Lasiosiphon caffer, Lippia javanica, Schkuhria pinnata, Securidaca longepedunculata, Spirostachys africana, Stylochaeton natalensis and Zanthoxylum capense were the most widely used and preferred species for treatment of rhinitis and/or related symptom by all questioned THs.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to document plants used traditionally to treat rhinitis in Africa. Therefore, it provides a baseline data on the plants used to heal rhinitis in the Limpopo Province. Finding of this study can be used as apedestal for further investigation in to effective plant-based anti-rhinitis drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bapedi; Limpopo; rhinitis; traditional healers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30766574      PMCID: PMC6354866          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v18i4.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


Introduction

Rhinitis is a respiratory affliction that is characterised by inflammation of the nasal mucosa1. This complaint can either be allergic and non-allergic. Overall, rhinitis is a significant cause of both the widespread morbidity and medical treatment costs in many countries worldwide. It is estimated that over 400 million people inhabiting both developed and developing countries are diagnosed with this condition2. For instance, up to 40% of children, and approximately 20% of the adult population in the United States of America were previously reported to suffer from rhinitis3. The latter occurrence is lower compared to 29.8% noted by Morais-Almeida et al.4 amongst the adult subjects residing in Portugal. Eriksson5 reported 26.9% prevalence of rhinitis amid the West Swedenees population. Incidence of rhinitis is also common in Africa, and here it varies according to the geographical location as well as age group. In Nigeria the prevalence of 29.6% amongst adults aged between 18 and 45 years was previously registered6. The occurrence of rhinitis in this age brackets was 10.4% in Cameroon7. This respiratory infection affected at least 15.3% of Egyptian population aged 11–15 year olds8. In South Africa, there are extremely few epidemiological studies that addressed the prevalent of rhinitis. However, available study; Zar et al.9, was conducted in two phases carried out seven years apart, amongst the 13–14 year olds adolescents in randomly selected South African schools. The outcomes of this surveys indicated that the incidence of rhinitis amongst these subjects had increased significantly between two time points. For instance, in phase I of the investigation, conducted in 1995, the prevalence was 30.4%, and by phase II in 2003, the occurrence had gone up to 38.5%. The possible reasons for this drastic increase in the incidence of rhinitis could be attributed to the increasing prevalence of contributing factors. Although sometimes rhinitis is mistakenly viewed as a trivial disease, its symptoms may significantly affect a patient's quality of life10. Different disorders that are associated to this respiratory infection include bronchial asthma, sinusitis, otitis media, nasosinusal polyposis, respiratory infections and alterations in dental occlusion11. In addition, conditions such as headache, cognitive impairment, nasal obstruction, nasal itching, sneezing and watery rhinorrhoea are also common in rhinitis suffer12. Therefore, appropriate management of this respiratory affliction may be an important component in effective management of all the above stated coexisting or complicating respiratory ailments. According to DeGuzman et al.13, management approaches of rhinitis by western health care professionals in Africa and elsewhere include educating patients about the various strategies to avoid risk factors such as animals and insect allergens, house dust mites, molds and pollens, amongst other factors. Therapeutic options or pharmacological agents such as anti-H1 antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, topical anticholinergic, topical or oral vasoconstrictors and sodium cromoglycate are also prescribed by these professionals as part of rhinitis treatment and management14. Despite the evidence indicating prevalence of rhinitis and its management approaches employed by western health professionals; little is still known about the herbal medications implicated by the aboriginal health care providers as treatment of this affliction. However, few attempts to address this gap in knowledge have been made in countries such as Turkey15 and India16. In Africa as a continent wherein over 80% of the population relies on traditional medicines and healers' health care services either as the only option or the preferred option17, ethnobotanical studies focusing on the treatment of rhinitis are lacking. The aim of the present study is therefore, to investigate the therapeutic plants implicated by traditional healers in the Limpopo Province against rhinitis.

Methods

Study area and population

The area selected for survey was the municipalities of Capricorn, Sekhukhune and Waterberg districts, in the Limpopo Province, South Africa (Figure 1). Five villages from each municipality were selected as study sites. Generally, most of these settlements are poorly developed and lack basic infrastructures such as sanitations, roads and healthcare facilities.
Figure 1

Map of Limpopo Province indicating the studied areas (districts and municipalities).

Map of Limpopo Province indicating the studied areas (districts and municipalities). The populace of the sampled districts comprised of different ethnic groups, with Bapedi who speak Sepedi language being the largest group, comprising about 50% of the entire population18.

Ethnobotanical survey and data collection

The ethical approval to conduct the present study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the University of Fort Hare (Ref: MAR001SSEMO1). Prior to the field survey, permission to conduct an investigation was sought from the local tribal leaders of each sampled village, and subsequently THs were requested to take part in this study. Both the local community leaders and all the THs were informed about the purpose of the survey. Traditional healers who agreed to participate in the study were asked to sign a consent form before being questioned. Data was collected from May 2017 to October 2017 using semi structure questionnaires during face-to-face interview with 105 THs who were conveniently chosen (i.e., with the help of local leaders and THs). The questionnaire was designed to captured information on the local name of used medicinal plants by THs to treat rhinitis, used plant part/s, mode of herbal preparation, administration and dosage prescription. Interviews were conducted by researchers, independently for each traditional healer in Sepedi language. The data obtained from questionnaire guides was supplemented by independent field walk with each traditional healer for the practical identification of used medicinal plants and direct observations on their characteristics. During field trips plants were initially pointed-out by THs via vernacular names and subsequently researchers collected the voucher specimens. The collected plant samples were prepared (i.e., numbered, pressed and dried) and deposited at the Larry Leach Herbarium (University of Limpopo) for scientific identification by a trained taxonomist.

Data analysis

Micro Soft Excel and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)

Data from ethnobotanical surveys was analysed using Microsoft Excel 2000 and SPSS programmes by means of descriptive statistics. These programmes were used to identify proportions of plant families, habits, used species and their parts, condition of medicinal plant part/s use (fresh/dried), mode of remedies preparations and administration, amongst the other information.

Fidelity level (FL)

The FL was employed to quantify the percentages of THs claiming the use of a certain plant for rhinitis and/related symptom/s. This was determined following the method of Al-Quran19: Where Np was the number of THs who independently used a particular plant species to treat rhinitis and/or related symptom, and N was the total number of THs who reported the plant as a medicine to treat any given disease (rhinitis or related symptom/s). The FL index shows the degree of homogeneity on the informant's knowledge regarding the medical application of a particular medicinal plant species against a specific ailment19, therefore it reveals the most utilised and avoided species.

Use value (UV)

Use value provides a good measure to estimate all the possible uses of an individual plant species. An individual plant-disease-use combination mentioned by Bapedi THs for rhinitis and related symptoms was evaluated using the formula outlined below20: Where U was the number of citations per species, and was N the total number of questioned THs. Generally, UV for a plant is high when there are corresponding broad therapeutic applications coupled with a relatively high use mentioned (UM) by participants20.

Results

Diversity of used plant species

In the present study a total of 63 plant species (55 indigenous and 8 exotics) from 59 genera distributed across 40 botanical families, mainly the Asteraceae (7 spp.), Euphorbiaceae (6 spp.) and Malvaceae (4 spp.) were used by 105 Bapedi THs to treat rhinitis and various symptoms they perceived as related to this respiratory infection (Table 1). Amongst these plant species, only 19% (n=12) comprising of Artemisia afra, Clerodendrum ternatum, Cryptocarya transvaalensis, Enicostema axillare, Kalanchoe brachyloba, Lasiosiphon caffer, Lippia javanica, Schkuhria pinnata, Securidaca longepedunculata, Spirostachys africana, Stylochaeton natalensis and Zanthoxylum capense were most widely distributed and used by all THs (n=105) who treated rhinitis across the studied districts and municipalities.
Table 1

Medicinal plants used by Bapedi traditional healers to treat rhinitis and related symptoms in the Limpopo Province, South Africa

Botanical familySpecies nameVernacular nameHabitUsed plant partsState of useMethods of herbal preparation and administrationAliment / streatedFrequency of use; N=THs (105)FLUV
UM%
AnacardiaceaeSclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.)Morula/MokanoTreeFruitFreshJuice is squeezed (raw), dried and pounded. Powder is poured in the hot water. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis32.81000.02
Apiaceae*Daucus carota L.MokherotseHerbTuberFreshMixed with fresh root of M. sapientum. Macerated in cold water for 5 hrs. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
ApocynaceaeAcokanthera rotundata (Codd) KupichaMoethiShrubRootDryPounded and a pinch of fingers is snuffed (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis109.51000.09
ApocynaceaeStrophanthus speciosus (Ward & Harv.) ReberMorarwaneShrubRootDryBoiled for 6–12 minutes. Extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayFatigue2321.91000.21
AraceaeStylochaeton natalensis Schott Aloe spp.Mokunya/MokušheteHerbRootDryBoiled for 5 minutes. Steam inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1021001001
Pounded and poured in boiled water. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis3
AsphodelaceaeAloe marlothii A.Berger subsp. MarlothiiThogo/ MarobadibogaleShrubLeafFreshJuice is squeezed (raw) and a drop is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
AsphodelaceaeArtemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd. var. afraSekgopha-sa-go-emaShrubLeafFreshJuice is squeezed (raw) and a drop is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
AsteraceaeAthrixia phylicoides DCLegana/MoilanšiHerbLeafDryBoiled for 4–5 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
AsteraceaeGeigeria burkei Harv. subsp. burkei var. hirtella merxmMohlahlaiša/ MmangwakoShrubLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayRhinitis10.91000.00
AsteraceaeKleinia longiflora DC.Mmagae/ MmalefagongHerbWhole plantDryPounded and mixed with warm water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes2624.71000.24
Asteraceae*Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) Kuntze ex Thell.MmaleShrubTwigDryPounded and mixed with warm water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes5047.61000.47
AsteraceaeSenecio serratuloides DC.Šathume/Mošašane/ SeralaneHerbWhole plantFreshMacerated in cold water for 5–24 hrs. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes1051001001
AsteraceaeVernonia natalensis Sch.Bip. ex Walp.LegatuludiShrubLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayFatigue32.81000.02
AsteraceaeMarkhamia zanzibarica (Bojer ex DC.) K.SchumMošuhlaHerbLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache10.91000.00
BignoniaceaeCommiphora marlothii Engl.BolebatšaTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with warm water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes43.81000.03
BurseraceaeWarburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov.MphaphaphaTreeRootDryBurned for about 4 seconds. Smoke is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis10.91000.03
CanellaceaeCapparis tomentosa Lam. Cleome gynandra L. Gymnosporia maranguensis (Loes.) Loes.MolakaTreeBarkDryBoiled for 4–11 minutes. Extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayFatigue10.933.30.02
Headache10.933.3
Pounded and mixed with dried powdered root of Z. capense. Taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayRhinitis10.933.3
CapparaceaeGymnosporia senegalensis (Lam.) Loes.MoopatladiTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
CapparaceaeCommelina africana L. var. AfricanaLerothoHerbLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayRhinitis10.91000.00
CelastraceaeKalanchoe brachyloba Welw. ex BrittenMokgoropoTreeRootDryPounded and taken orally with soft porridge. Thrice a dayHeadache54.71000.04
CelastraceaeCyperus sexangularis NeesMphatoTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes43.81000.03
CommelinaceaeEuphorbia inaequilatera Sond. var. inaequilateraBolebatšaHerbRootDryBoiled for 9–12 minutes. Drop of cold extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
CrassulaceaeCroton menyharthii PaxMoethi/ Mošimanewanaga/ MoritšikanaShrubLeafFreshRubbed (raw) between hands and vapour is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache1051001001
CyperaceaeEuphorbia schinzii Pax Jatropha zeyheri Sond.MohlahlaHerbRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayFatigue7572.31000.72
Pounded and mixed with powdered dried root of S. italica. Taken orally with soft porridge. Thrice a dayFatigue1
EuphorbiaceaeSpirostachys africana Sond. Tragia dioica Sond.Kgamaswana/ MmatelafaceHerbWhole plantDryBurned for about 4–15 seconds. Smoke is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis21.966.60.01
Pounded and mixed with warm water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.933.30.00
EuphorbiaceaeSenna italica Mill. subsp. arachoides (Burch.) LockMoologaTreeRootDryBoiled for 5 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayPainful eyes21.91000.01
EuphorbiaceaeTylosema esculentum (Burch.) A.Schreib. Enicostema axillare (Lam.) A.Raynal subsp. AxillareNgaka-dianyaHerbRootDryBoiled for 5–8 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayPainful eyes43.811.70.33
Rhinitis3021.488.2
EuphorbiaceaeClerodendrum ternatum SchinzSephapabadiyaHerbRootDryBoiled for 5 minutes. Extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayFatigue10.91000.00
EuphorbiaceaeCryptocarya transvaalensis Burtt DavyMorekuri/ MotampotaTreeRootDryBurned for about 7–8 minute. Smoke inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache1051001001
EuphorbiaceaeAdansonia digitata LBogopa/MabatšaneHerbLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice day.Fatigue10.91000.00
FabaceaeGrewia bicolor Juss. var. bicolorMoroteladitšhošiHerbRootDryPounded and mixed with dried powered root of C. sexangularis. Taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayFatigue10.91000.00
FabaceaeGrewia hispida Harv.Monoga/Noga-kotoHerbRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache10.91000.00
GentianaceaeHibiscus meyeri Harv. subsp. meyeriMakgonotšohle/ Mphedu-ya-thabaHerbWhole plantDryBoiled for 5 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
Lamiaceae0Ficus burkei (Miq.) Miq.SebokaneHerbWhole plantDryBoiled for 5 minutes. Steam inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
Lauraceae*Moringa oleifera sensu Exell & MendonKgosupsaTreeBarkDryPounded and poured in boiled water. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
Malvaceae*Musa sapientum LMogooTreeRootDryBoiled for 6–10 minutes. Extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayFatigue7773.31000.73
MalvaceaeMyrothamnus flabellifolius Welw.MogwaneTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes21.91000.01
Malvaceae*Nymphaea mexicana Zucc.Mogwete/Mogolori/ LefieloShrubRootDryPounded and extract is taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
MalvaceaeXimenia caffra Sond. var. natalensis Sond.Motomelatšie/ Mogatšatšipa/ MotiatswaneHerbRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes98.51000.08
MoraceaeAdenia spinosa Burtt Davy Flueggea virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Voigt subsp. VirosaMoumoTreeFruitDryBurned for about 6 seconds. Smoke is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache11.91000.01
Boiled for 5 minutes. Extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayHeadache1
MoringaceaeSorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. arundinaceum (Desv.) de Wet & HarlanMoringkaTreeLeafDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayFatigue61581000.58
Musaceae*Zea mays subsp. mays L.MopananaTreeRootFreshMixed with tuber of D. carota. Macerated in cold water for 5 hrs. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes10.91000.00
MyrothamnaceaeSecuridaca longepedunculata Fresen. var. longepedunculataPatše-ya-tšhwene/ MatlapanengHerbWhole plantDryPounded and extract is taken orally. Thrice a dayHeadache65.71000.05
NymphaeaceaePtaeroxylon obliquum (Thunb.) Radlk.HlapiHerbWhole plantDryMacerated in cold water for 30 minutes to an hour. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes2624.71000.24
OlacaceaeBerchemia discolor (Klotzsch) Hemsl. Ziziphus mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronataMotšhidi-kgomoTreeRootDryBurned for about 5–11 seconds. Smoke is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache77.61000.07
Pounded and mixed with dried powdered root of V. infausta. Taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache1
PassifloraceaeVangueria infausta Burch. subsp. infausta Zanthoxylum capense (Thunb.) Harv. Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sond.) T.D.Penn.Monna-apare/ Pisayabatšumi/ MothemaShrubStemDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayFatigue2624.7530.46
Boiled for 5 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayPainful eyes21.94
Rhinitis212042.8
Phyllanthaceae*Capsicum annuum L. var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser & PickersgilMohlakaumeShrubRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes65.71000.05
Poaceae*Nicotiana tabacum L.Mabele-thoroHerbSeedDryPounded and taken orally with Mageu® drink or soft porridge. Thrice a dayFatigue1817.11000.17
PoaceaeSolanum panduriforme E.Mey.MabeleHerbRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache10.91000.00
PolygalaceaeLasiosiphon caffer Meisn. Xerophyta retinervis Baker Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng.Mphesu/ MpitlamaragoTreeRootDryBoiled for 5–10 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayHeadache10510098.11.01
Pounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayRhinitis11.41.8
Pounded and mixed with powdered root of Z. capense. A pinch of finger is snuffed (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis1
PtaeroxylaceaeSiphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.Burtt Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.)MogabaletswanaTreeRootDryBurned for about 5–11 minutes. Smoke is inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache190.41000.90
Pounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache94
Rhamnaceae*Daucus carota L.Moneyee/ MogokgomaTreeRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayPainful eyes1211.41000.11
RhamnaceaeAcokanthera rotundata (Codd) KupichaMokgaloTreeRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache10.91000.00
RubiaceaeStrophanthus speciosus (Ward & Harv.) Reber Stylochaeton natalensis SchottMmiloTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with dried powdered root of X. caffra. Taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache10.91000.09
Pounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache98.5
RutaceaeAloe spp. Aloe marlothii A.Berger subsp. Marlothii Artemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd. var. afra Athrixia phylicoides DCMonokwane/ MoregakgakaTreeRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache2624.719.81.24
Pounded and mixed with dried powdered bark of W. salutaris. Taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayRhinitis110080.1
Pounded and mixed with dried powdered root of S. longepedunculata. A pinch of finger is snuffed (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis1
Boiled for 5–8 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis103
SapotaceaeGeigeria burkei Harv. subsp. burkei var. hirtella merxmMohlatshwaTreeRootDryPounded and mixed with cold water. Drop of extract is applied topically in the eyes. Thrice a dayPainful eyes2624.71000.24
SolanaceaeKleinia longiflora DC.MophephaShrubRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache21.91000.01
Solanaceae*Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) Kuntze ex Thell. Senecio serratuloides DC.MofolaShrubLeafDryPounded and a pinch of a finger is snuff (nasally). Thrice a dayHeadache21.97.60.24
Rhinitis2422.892.3
SolanaceaeVernonia natalensis Sch.Bip. e x Walp.Mothola-o-moserolwaneHerbRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache1716.11000.16
ThymelaeaceaMarkhamia zanzibarica (Bojer ex DC.) K.SchumNkekologeShrubRootDryPounded and poured in boiled water. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
VelloziaceaeCommiphora marlothii Engl.ThuseHerbRootDryPounded and taken orally with warm water. Thrice a dayHeadache1716.11000.16
VerbenaceaeWarburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov.Mošunkwane/ motlaba-dipooShrubLeafFreshBoiled for 5–10 minutes. Steam is inhaled (nasally) under blanket. Thrice a dayRhinitis1051001001
ZingiberaceaeCapparis tomentosa Lam.SerokoloHerbBulbFreshRaw piece is rubbed between hands and vapour inhaled (nasally). Thrice a dayRhinitis2523.81000.23

Key: Exotic plant species: asterisk (*), fidelity level; FL, use mention; UM and use value; UV

Medicinal plants used by Bapedi traditional healers to treat rhinitis and related symptoms in the Limpopo Province, South Africa Key: Exotic plant species: asterisk (*), fidelity level; FL, use mention; UM and use value; UV

The use of plants to treat ailments

Further analysis of the finding from this study showed that of 63 plant species recorded, 20.6% (n=13); A. afra, Acokanthera rotundata, Athrixia phylicoides, C. ternatum, Cleome gynandra, Aloe marlothii, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, L. javanica, L. caffer, Siphonochilus aethiopicus, Sclerocarya birrea, and S. natalensis were used exclusively as rhinitis treatment, and 11.1% (n=7) of plants namely Adenia spinosa and Warburgia salutaris (fatigue and painful eyes), Euphorbia inaequilatera and Euphorbia schinzii ( rhinitis and painful eyes), Nicotiana tabacum (headache), S. longepedunculata (headache) and Z. capense (headache) used by Bapedi THs for rhinitis and the mentioned perceived symptoms. The reminder of the plants (68.2%, n=43) were used wholly as remedies for the following symptoms; fatigue, headache and painful eyes in patients diagnosed with rhinitis (Table 1).

Plant habit

Growth forms of the 63 documented plants in this study were analysed. Accordingly, herbs (39.6%, n=25) were the most common habit used for medicinal purposes, followed by trees (36.5%, n=23) and shrubs (23.8%, n=15) respectively.

Fidelity level (FL) and use value (UV)

Of all (n=63) the medicinal plants documented in this study, A. afra (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), C. ternatum (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), C. transvaalensis (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), E. axillare (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), K. brachyloba (UM=105 and FL=100; headache), L. caffer (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), L. javanica (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), S. pinnata (UM=105 and FL=100; painful eyes), S. longepedunculata (UM=105 and FL=100; headache), S. africana (UM=105and FL=100; headache), S. natalensis (UM=105 and FL=100; rhinitis), and Z. capense (UM=105 and FL=80.1; rhinitis, and UM=26 and FL=19.8; headache), respectively had the highest FL as treatments of the mentioned ailment/s. The highest UV calculated in this study was 1.24 for Z. capense (headache and rhinitis therapies), and 1.01 for S. longepedunculata (headache and rhinitis), respectively. This was closely and equally followed by A. afra, C. ternatum, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, L. caffer, L. javanica, S. natalensis (UV=1; rhinitis, for each), K. brachyloba and S. africana (UV=1; headache, for each) as well as S. pinnata (UV=1; painful eyes).

Plant parts used, mode of preparations, dosages and administrations

Root (55.5%, n=35), followed by leaf (19%, n=12), whole plant (11.1%, n=7), bark and fruit (3.1%, n=2, for each), bulb, seed, tuber, twig and stem (1.5%, n=1, for each), respectively were mostly used plant parts in this study. Larger number of these plant parts was prepared by THs in their dry (85.7%, n=54) state than when they are still fresh (14.2%, n=9). Overall, 77 recipes prepared from the recorded plant parts were documented as described by Bapedi THs (Table 1). About 87% (n=67) of these recipes was made from a single plant part, and just 12.9% (n=10) was prepared from mixtures of diverse plant parts. The most common methods of preparation of the 77 documented recipes described by Bapedi THs were pounding (59.7%, n=46), boiling (20.7%, n=16), burning (7.7%, n=6), macerating (5.1%, n=4), squeezing and rubbing (2.5%, n=2, for each), squeezing and pounding (1.2%, n=1), respectively. Most of the prepared recipes/remedies in this study were dispensed orally (44.1%, n=34), nasally (33.7%, n=26) and topically (22%, n=17), respectively. Oral medication was prescribed as liquid or powder (Table 1). Pounded therapies were mainly taken with warm water as a vehicle. However, in few instance these therapies were mixed with additives such as Mageu® drink or soft porridge. According to THs these additives enhance the effectiveness of prescriptions. Nasal remedies were primarily taken as steam under a blanket. Dosage strength of all herbal preparation documented in the present study was determined. In general, consistencies amongst THs with regards to this were only noted for boiled liquid medicine taken orally. For instance, a metal cup (500ml) was prescribed by all Bapedi THs three times a day (morning, midday and evening). However, dosage regimes of the rest of the herbal recipes made by these THs was not standardised, and depended on an individual healers' experience.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first in South Africa and Africa as a continent to investigate plants used traditionally by THs or lay people to treat rhinitis and related symptoms, thus there is a dearth of comparative data against which to evaluate our findings. As a matter of fact, there is generally a scanty of information regarding the use of herbal remedies to treat these conditions worldwide. However, few attempts to address this gap in knowledge have been made in countries such as Turkey15 and India16. Comparison of medicinal plants documented in these two studies with ours is divergent, probably due to the fact that diverse cultures of the world possess their own specific knowledge of plant use and tradition21. We documented 63 plant species belonging to 40 botanical families, mainly the Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae and Malvaceae used by Bapedi THs to treat rhinitis and related symptoms. Kanakavalli et al.16 reported the dominant of Fabaceae, and Sayin et al.15 found that all the botanical families in their study were each equally represented by a single species. The dominance of Asteracea, Malvaceae and Euphorbiaceae in our study could be attributed to their wider distribution across the studied sites, which in turn afforded local THs with higher diversity of plants to explore healing potential, and subsequently experiment against various human ailments including rhinitis. The remaining families recorded in this study were represented with less than three species used to heal rhinitis and related symptoms, thus correspondingly suggesting that their members are less popular amongst the interviewed Bapedi THs as treatment of these diseases. Overall higher number of taxa and associated botanical families documented in this study shows that Bapedi THs are knowledgeable about diversity of plants useful for rhinitis and related conditions. Also such high diversity to some extent is a good indicator that the studied areas harbour diverse habitats which supports a rich curative floristic wealth useful for these illnesses. The widespread utilisations of species such as A. afra, C. ternatum, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, K. brachyloba, L. caffer, L. javanica, S. pinnata, S. longepedunculata, S. africana, S. natalensis and Z. capense in this study emphasize their importance as remedies in Bapedi traditional healing sector, and also demonstrate that there are vital ethnobotanical contact points among THs in the studied districts. However, the extent of utilisation of theremaining species in this study is also understandable given that native knowledge is not uniformly distributed amongst culturally homogeneous group living in the same and different biophysical territory22, and that healers have different knowledge regarding herbal medicine used for human ailments. To the best of our knowledge all the species (A. afra, A. rotundata, A. phylicoides, C. ternatum, C. gynandra, Commiphora marlothii, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, L. javanica, L. caffer, S. aethiopicus, S. birrea, and S. natalensis) used exclusively as cure for rhinitis are recorded for the first time in the present study as remedies for rhinitis, probably due to lack of African ethnobotanical studies focusing on this affliction. Overall, A. afra, C. ternatum, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, L. caffer, L. javanica and S. natalensis was important species used by all THs (n=105) who treated this respiratory infection. Although not exclusively used for rhinitis, traditional utilisation of some of these species particularly A. afra23 and L. javanica24 against various respiratory infections in general are supported by scientific studies; hence they are mostly utilized by Bapedi THs. To yield more critical insights into the potential of most of the above-widely used taxa in this study, as future treatment of rhinitis, and to better understand rationales as to why Bapedi THs prefer them, an investigation in to their effectiveness and safety specifically in the treatment of rhinitis should be investigated. Amongst the 11.1% of plants namely A. spinosa and W. salutaris (fatigue and painful eyes), E. inaequilatera and E. schinzii (rhinitis and painful eyes), N. tabacum (headache) and Z. capense (rhinitis and headache) used by Bapedi THs for rhinitis and the mentioned perceived symptoms, only use of N. tabacum25 as well as S. longepedunculata26 to treat headache was reported in literature. Thus uses of both these species for rhinitis are recorded in our study for the first time. Similarly, medicinal use of the remaining plants A. spinosa, E. inaequilatera, E. schinzii, W. salutaris and Z. capense for rhinitis and the aforesaid ailment/s are so far restricted to Bapedi THs. Similarly, larger number of species recorded in this study as being used by THs to heal fatigue, headache and painful eyes (table 1), in patients diagnosed with rhinitis are recorded for the first time as medicines for these conditions. However, some of the medical application/s of Adansonia digitata27, Capsicum annuum28, C. gynandra29, Daucus carota30, Myrothamnus flabellifolius31, Moringa oleifera32, Ptaeroxylon obliquum33, S. africana34, S. pinnata5, Vernonia natalensis36, Ximenia caffra37, Zea mays38 and Ziziphus mucronata39 by Bapedi THs are in partial agreements with previous studies conducted in other areas of South Africa, African countries and elsewhere, which reported applications of these species for fatigue, headache or painful eyes. in rhinitis suffers with various medicinal plants by Bapedi THs is an indication that they do take this respiratory infection serious, and thus investigation of the efficacy of these plants should be conducted. Effective herbal treatments of these symptoms are equally imperative in achieving the best outcomes of diagnosed patients. This is because it might assist in eliminating both occurrences and associated health impact of such symptoms that might affect quality. Our study revealed that THs mainly prefer herbaceous and tree species for the preparation of herbal medicine to heal and manage rhinitis and related symptoms. Their distinct preferences of herbaceous species could be attributed to the fact that they are abundant at close proximity and are easy to harvest with less effort, both compared to trees and shrubs. On the other hand, utilisation of these two growth forms might be due to their ease of identification in the wild, high adaptability as well as capacity to proliferate in various seasons, thus available throughout the year. In general, the above recorded habits might be a reflection of the curative plant community structure across the studied areas. Plant species which scored the highest FL as treatments of rhinitis and related symptoms in this study indicate greater agreement among the THs regarding their phyto-therapeutic use/s which might be attributed to efficacy, hence their strong selectivity over the others. Thus, such species should be prioritised for phytochemistry and pharmacological properties studies. Similar attention must be given to species such as Z. capense (headache and rhinitis therapies), S. longepedunculata (headache and rhinitis), A. afra, C. ternatum, C. transvaalensis, E. axillare, L. caffer, L. javanica, S. natalensis (rhinitis), K. brachyloba and S. africana (headache, for each) and S. pinnata (painful eyes) with the highest UV index. However, the high UVs of these species also indicates the need to promote their sustainable utilisations and harvesting. Roots and leaves were mostly used plant parts in this study. On contrary, Kanakavalli et al.16 reported leaf, rhizome and whole plant as equally favoured medicinal plant parts for preparation of rhinitis remedies. The observed discrepancies might be due to the larger number (n=63) of plant recorded in our study compared to just nine species noted by this authors. Larger number of plant parts in our study was prepared by THs in their dry) state than when they are still fresh, thus suggesting that few species are grown in home gardens or available in close vicinity for instance use as medicines. Not surprising, about 87% of herbal recipes was made from a single plant part, perhaps due to the ease of preparation compared to poly-recipes. Overall, diverse procedures of herbal preparing medicines recorded in this study might be attributed to THs' preferences or is a reflection of an old tradition amid these THs observed from various mentors. Different route of administering remedies such as burning and inhalation, rubbing between hands for inhalation of vapour and snuffing might be effective for treatment and management of rhinitis, mainly due to the fact that prescriptions go directly to the nasal membranes, thus might act on various components of the nasal inflammatory process reducing inflammatory cell numbers.

Conclusion

Our study is the first to document plants used traditionally to treat rhinitis and related symptoms in South Africa and Africa at large. Therefore, it is not surprising that all species used by interviewed Bapedi THs are recorded in this survey for the first time as rhinitis cure. On the other hand, high usage of some of the plant species implicated by these THs in the treatments of symptoms they perceived as allied to rhinitis across the studied district and municipalities, confirm the authenticity of data gathered and importance of such species. Overall, the medicated claims of the species inventoried in the study need to be evaluated through phytochemical and pharmacological investigations. Scanty of ethnobotanical information focusing on treatment of rhinitis and related symptoms in South Africa and Africa as a continent call for an urgent need to record such valuable data before it becomes inaccessible or vanishes together with its holders.
  15 in total

1.  Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.

Authors:  P van Cauwenberge; C Bachert; G Passalacqua; J Bousquet; G W Canonica; S R Durham; W J Fokkens; P H Howarth; V Lund; H J Malling; N Mygind; D Passali; G K Scadding; D Y Wang
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 13.146

2.  Ethnopharmacological survey of wild medicinal plants in Showbak, Jordan.

Authors:  S Al-Qura'n
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  Prevalence and socioeconomic associations of asthma and allergic rhinitis in northern [corrected] Africa.

Authors:  V Georgy; H I Fahim; M El-Gaafary; S Walters
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Global alliance against chronic respiratory diseases.

Authors:  J Bousquet; R Dahl; N Khaltaev
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 13.146

5.  Prevalence of self reported allergic rhinitis and its relationship with asthma among adult Nigerians.

Authors:  O O Desalu; A K Salami; K R Iseh; P O Oluboyo
Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  An antimicrobial evaluation of plants used for the treatment of respiratory infections in rural Maputaland, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  T York; S F van Vuuren; H de Wet
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.360

7.  The changing prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic eczema in African adolescents from 1995 to 2002.

Authors:  Heather J Zar; Rodney I Ehrlich; Lesley Workman; Eugene G Weinberg
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.377

Review 8.  Allergic rhinitis: continuous or on demand antihistamine therapy?

Authors:  J Montoro; J Sastre; I Jáuregui; J Bartra; I Dávila; A del Cuvillo; M Ferrer; J Mullol; A Valero
Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Chronic rhinitis in South Africa: update 2013.

Authors:  Robin John Green; Maurice Hockman; Raymond Friedman; Martin Davis; Marinda McDonald; Riaz Seedat; Carla Els; Michael Levin; Paul C Potter; Charles Feldman
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2013-04-30

10.  Medicinal uses of tobacco in history.

Authors:  Anne Charlton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.