Anamika Adwaney1, Charlotte Lim1, Sarah Blakey1, Neill Duncan1, Damien R Ashby2. 1. West London Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, UK. 2. West London Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, UK d.ashby@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Central venous catheters have traditionally provided access for urgent hemodialysis, but are also sometimes advocated as an option for older or more comorbid patients. Adverse effects of this type of dialysis access include central venous stenosis, for which the risk factors and consequences are incompletely understood. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted two studies within the same population cohort, comprising all patients starting hemodialysis in a single center from January 2006 to December 2013. First, patients were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of central venous stenosis; their access outcomes are described and survival compared with matched controls drawn from the same population. Second, a subset of patients with a history of catheter access within this cohort was analyzed to determine risk factors for central venous stenosis. RESULTS: Among 2811 patients, central venous stenosis was diagnosed in 120 (4.3%), at a median dialysis vintage of 2.9 (interquartile range, 1.8-4.6) years. Compared with matched controls, patients with central venous stenosis had similar survival (median 5.1 versus 5.2 years; P=0.54). Among a subset of 500 patients, all with a history of catheter use, 34 (6.8%) developed central venous stenosis, at a rate of 2.2 per 100 patient-years. The incidence of central venous stenosis was higher with larger number of previous catheters (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]. 1.6 to 2.9), pacemaker insertion (RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.9), and was lower with older age (RR, 0.7 per decade; 95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the catheter number, pacemaker, and younger age at dialysis initiation were all significant independent risk factors for central venous stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Central venous stenosis occurred in a minority of patients on hemodialysis, and was associated with compromised future access, but unchanged survival. Among patients with a history of catheter use, risk related to both the number of catheters and the total catheter duration, although nondialysis factors such as pacemakers were also important. Central venous stenosis risk was lower in older patients, supporting the selective use of tunneled catheters in this group.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Central venous catheters have traditionally provided access for urgent hemodialysis, but are also sometimes advocated as an option for older or more comorbid patients. Adverse effects of this type of dialysis access include central venous stenosis, for which the risk factors and consequences are incompletely understood. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted two studies within the same population cohort, comprising all patients starting hemodialysis in a single center from January 2006 to December 2013. First, patients were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of central venous stenosis; their access outcomes are described and survival compared with matched controls drawn from the same population. Second, a subset of patients with a history of catheter access within this cohort was analyzed to determine risk factors for central venous stenosis. RESULTS: Among 2811 patients, central venous stenosis was diagnosed in 120 (4.3%), at a median dialysis vintage of 2.9 (interquartile range, 1.8-4.6) years. Compared with matched controls, patients with central venous stenosis had similar survival (median 5.1 versus 5.2 years; P=0.54). Among a subset of 500 patients, all with a history of catheter use, 34 (6.8%) developed central venous stenosis, at a rate of 2.2 per 100 patient-years. The incidence of central venous stenosis was higher with larger number of previous catheters (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]. 1.6 to 2.9), pacemaker insertion (RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.9), and was lower with older age (RR, 0.7 per decade; 95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the catheter number, pacemaker, and younger age at dialysis initiation were all significant independent risk factors for central venous stenosis. CONCLUSIONS:Central venous stenosis occurred in a minority of patients on hemodialysis, and was associated with compromised future access, but unchanged survival. Among patients with a history of catheter use, risk related to both the number of catheters and the total catheter duration, although nondialysis factors such as pacemakers were also important. Central venous stenosis risk was lower in older patients, supporting the selective use of tunneled catheters in this group.
Authors: Carrie A Schinstock; Robert C Albright; Amy W Williams; John J Dillon; Eric J Bergstralh; Bernice M Jenson; James T McCarthy; Karl A Nath Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Wang Xi; Jennifer MacNab; Charmaine E Lok; Timmy C Lee; Ivan D Maya; Michele H Mokrzycki; Louise M Moist Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Thaminda Liyanage; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Vivekanand Jha; Bruce Neal; Halle Marie Patrice; Ikechi Okpechi; Ming-hui Zhao; Jicheng Lv; Amit X Garg; John Knight; Anthony Rodgers; Martin Gallagher; Sradha Kotwal; Alan Cass; Vlado Perkovic Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Qusai Aljarrah; Mohammed Allouh; Amer H Hallak; Shamikh E Alghezawi; Mamoon Al-Omari; Mwaffaq Elheis; Mooath Al-Jarrah; Sohail Bakkar; Abdelwahab J Aleshawi; Hussam Al-Jarrah; Khalid S Ibrahim; Jan Mohammed Al Shishani; Aws Almukhtar Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2020-10-09