Xiang Zhang1,2, Richard L Young1,3, Michelle Bound1, Sanyuan Hu2, Karen L Jones1,4, Michael Horowitz1,4, Christopher K Rayner1, Tongzhi Wu5,4,6. 1. Adelaide Medical School and Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2. Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 3. Nutrition and Metabolism, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 4. Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 5. Adelaide Medical School and Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia tongzhi.wu@adelaide.edu.au. 6. Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Cells releasing glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are distributed predominately in the proximal and distal gut, respectively. Hence, the region of gut exposed to nutrients may influence GIP and GLP-1 secretion and impact on the incretin effect and gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal (GIGD). We evaluated glycemic and incretin responses to glucose administered into the proximal or distal small intestine and quantified the corresponding incretin effect and GIGD in health and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten healthy subjects and 10 patients with T2DM were each studied on four occasions. On two days, a transnasal catheter was positioned with infusion ports opening 13 cm and 190 cm beyond the pylorus, and 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (a marker of glucose absorption) was infused into either site and 0.9% saline into the alternate site over 60 min. Matching intravenous isoglycemic clamp studies were performed on the other two days. Blood glucose, serum 3-O-methylglucose, and plasma hormones were evaluated over 180 min. RESULTS: In both groups, blood glucose and serum 3-O-methylglucose concentrations were higher after proximal than distal glucose infusion (all P < 0.001). Plasma GLP-1 increased minimally after proximal, but substantially after distal, glucose infusion, whereas GIP increased promptly after both infusions, with concentrations initially greater, but less sustained, with proximal versus distal infusion (all P < 0.001). Both the incretin effect and GIGD were less with proximal than distal glucose infusion (both P ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The distal, as opposed to proximal, small intestine is superior in modulating postprandial glucose metabolism in both health and T2DM.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Cells releasing glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are distributed predominately in the proximal and distal gut, respectively. Hence, the region of gut exposed to nutrients may influence GIP and GLP-1 secretion and impact on the incretin effect and gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal (GIGD). We evaluated glycemic and incretin responses to glucose administered into the proximal or distal small intestine and quantified the corresponding incretin effect and GIGD in health and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten healthy subjects and 10 patients with T2DM were each studied on four occasions. On two days, a transnasal catheter was positioned with infusion ports opening 13 cm and 190 cm beyond the pylorus, and 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (a marker of glucose absorption) was infused into either site and 0.9% saline into the alternate site over 60 min. Matching intravenous isoglycemic clamp studies were performed on the other two days. Blood glucose, serum 3-O-methylglucose, and plasma hormones were evaluated over 180 min. RESULTS: In both groups, blood glucose and serum 3-O-methylglucose concentrations were higher after proximal than distal glucose infusion (all P < 0.001). Plasma GLP-1 increased minimally after proximal, but substantially after distal, glucose infusion, whereas GIP increased promptly after both infusions, with concentrations initially greater, but less sustained, with proximal versus distal infusion (all P < 0.001). Both the incretin effect and GIGD were less with proximal than distal glucose infusion (both P ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The distal, as opposed to proximal, small intestine is superior in modulating postprandial glucose metabolism in both health and T2DM.
Authors: T D Müller; B Finan; S R Bloom; D D'Alessio; D J Drucker; P R Flatt; A Fritsche; F Gribble; H J Grill; J F Habener; J J Holst; W Langhans; J J Meier; M A Nauck; D Perez-Tilve; A Pocai; F Reimann; D A Sandoval; T W Schwartz; R J Seeley; K Stemmer; M Tang-Christensen; S C Woods; R D DiMarchi; M H Tschöp Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 7.422
Authors: Dale S Edgerton; Guillaume Kraft; Marta S Smith; Lindsey M Moore; Ben Farmer; Melanie Scott; Mary C Moore; Michael A Nauck; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Ryan J Jalleh; Karen L Jones; Christopher K Rayner; Chinmay S Marathe; Tongzhi Wu; Michael Horowitz Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Edgar G Dorsey-Trevino; Varinderpal Kaur; Josep M Mercader; Jose C Florez; Aaron Leong Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: E O Beale; W Lee; A Lee; C Lee; E Soffer; P F Crookes; K Eagilen; R Chen; W J Mack; H Tong Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 5.097
Authors: Wei-Kun Huang; Cong Xie; Richard L Young; Jiang-Bo Zhao; Heike Ebendorff-Heidepriem; Karen L Jones; Christopher K Rayner; Tong-Zhi Wu Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Jens J Holst; Ida M Modvig; Daniel B Andersen; Kaare V Grunddal; Rune E Kuhre; Christoffer Martinussen; Charlotte B Christiansen; Cathrine Ørskov; Pierre Larraufie; Richard G Kay; Frank Reimann; Fiona M Gribble; Bolette Hartmann; Kirstine N Bojsen-Møller; Sten Madsbad Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 5.095