Literature DB >> 30763550

Dose-dependence of chemical carcinogenicity: Biological mechanisms for thresholds and implications for risk assessment.

Rebecca A Clewell1, Chad M Thompson2, Harvey J Clewell3.   

Abstract

Current regulatory practices for chemical carcinogens were established when scientific understanding of the molecular mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis was in its infancy. Initial discovery that DNA mutation was the root of cancer led quickly to regulatory processes that assumed such a simple relationship could be described with a linear approach. This linear, no threshold approach has since become the default approach to risk assessment of chemicals with carcinogenic potential. Since then, a multitude of intrinsic processes have been identified at the molecular, cellular and organism level that work to prevent transient DNA damage from causing permanent mutations, and mutated cells from becoming cancer. Mounting evidence indicates that these protective mechanisms can prevent carcinogenesis at low doses of genotoxic chemicals, leading to non-linear dose-response. Further, a number of non-genotoxic mechanisms have demonstrated threshold-shaped dose-response for cancer outcomes. The existence of non-linear dose-response curves for both non-genotoxic and genotoxic chemical carcinogens stands in stark contrast to the default risk assessment approach that assumes low dose linearity. In this review, we highlight some of the key discoveries and technological advances that have influenced scientific understanding of chemical carcinogenesis over the last fifty years and provide case studies to demonstrate the utility of these modern technologies in providing a biologically robust evaluation of chemical dose-response for cancer risk assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30763550     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Interact        ISSN: 0009-2797            Impact factor:   5.192


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  The Monetary Benefits of Reducing Emissions of Dioxin-like Compounds-Century Poisons-Over Half a Century: Evaluation of the Benefit per Ton Method.

Authors:  Je-Liang Liou; Han-Hui Chen; Pei-Ing Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Ethylene Oxide: Cancer Evidence Integration and Dose-Response Implications.

Authors:  Melissa J Vincent; Jordan S Kozal; William J Thompson; Andrew Maier; G Scott Dotson; Elizabeth A Best; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Threshold of Toxicological Concern-An Update for Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.

Authors:  Monika Batke; Fatemeh Moradi Afrapoli; Rupert Kellner; James F Rathman; Chihae Yang; Mark T D Cronin; Sylvia E Escher
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.