| Literature DB >> 30763450 |
Nicolas S Piuzzi, Assem A Sultan, Julian Gatta, Mitchell Ng, William A Cantrell, Anton Khlopas, Jared M Newman, Nipun Sodhi, Steven F Harwin, Michael A Mont.
Abstract
Total number of citations has been considered a proxy for a published study's importance within a given field. However, there are multiple pitfalls to correlating the total number of citations alone with the quality of a study. In this review, the authors aimed to identify the top 100 most-cited studies of hip and knee arthroplasty and then assess study design and quality of reporting. More than half of these studies were level IV evidence, unblinded, not randomized, and not controlled. This underscores the need for higher-quality study design to support practice. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e151-e161.]. Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30763450 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20190211-05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthopedics ISSN: 0147-7447 Impact factor: 1.390