Literature DB >> 30763234

Improving access to surgical innovation in the community: Implementation of shared access model in Canadian healthcare.

Mitchell G Goldenberg1, Brent Kerbel1, Rajiv K Singal1.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID： 30763234      PMCID： PMC6754253          DOI： 10.5489/cuaj.5248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN： 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Daniel A Bloch; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; April E Hebert; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Theodore Karrison; Sanjay G Patel; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  John W Yaxley; Geoffrey D Coughlin; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Nigel Dunglison; Rob Carter; Scott Williams; Diane J Payton; Joanna Perry-Keene; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  David Hughes; Charlotte Camp; Jamie O'Hara; Jim Adshead
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

6.  Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bolenz; Amit Gupta; Timothy Hotze; Richard Ho; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Claus G Roehrborn; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Nora H Ruel; Rosa Mejia; Giacomo Novara; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Andrew Close; Clare Robertson; Stephen Rushton; Mark Shirley; Luke Vale; Craig Ramsay; Robert Pickard
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 20.096
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ensuring a future for robotic surgery in Canada.

Authors:  Rajiv K Singal
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Characterization of Near-Infrared Imaging and Indocyanine-Green Use Amongst General Surgeons: A Survey of 263 General Surgeons.

Authors:  Kevin Verhoeff; Valentin Mocanu; Breanna Fang; Jerry Dang; Warren Sun; Noah J Switzer; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 1.785
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.