Literature DB >> 30763142

Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Karim Fizazi1, Neal Shore1, Teuvo L Tammela1, Albertas Ulys1, Egils Vjaters1, Sergey Polyakov1, Mindaugas Jievaltas1, Murilo Luz1, Boris Alekseev1, Iris Kuss1, Christian Kappeler1, Amir Snapir1, Toni Sarapohja1, Matthew R Smith1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Darolutamide is a structurally unique androgen-receptor antagonist that is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of darolutamide for delaying metastasis and death in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive darolutamide (600 mg [two 300-mg tablets] twice daily) or placebo while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, with the presence of metastasis determined by independent central review of radiographic imaging every 16 weeks.
RESULTS: In total, 1509 patients underwent randomization (955 to the darolutamide group and 554 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 437 primary end-point events had occurred, the median metastasis-free survival was 40.4 months with darolutamide, as compared with 18.4 months with placebo (hazard ratio for metastasis or death in the darolutamide group, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.50; P<0.001). Darolutamide was also associated with benefits with regard to all secondary end points, including overall survival, time to pain progression, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and time to a symptomatic skeletal event. The incidence of adverse events that occurred or worsened during the treatment period and had a frequency of 5% or more or were of grade 3 or higher was similar in the two groups; all such events except fatigue occurred in less than 10% of patients in either group. The percentage of patients who discontinued the assigned regimen because of adverse events was 8.9% in the darolutamide group and 8.7% in the placebo group. Darolutamide was not associated with a higher incidence of seizures, falls, fractures, cognitive disorder, or hypertension than placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Among men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival was significantly longer with darolutamide than with placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar for darolutamide and placebo. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare and Orion Pharma; ARAMIS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02200614.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30763142     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   176.079


  179 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  A candidate androgen signalling signature predictive of response to abiraterone acetate in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Myrto Boukovala; Nicholas Spetsieris; Justin A Weldon; Alexandros Tsikkinis; Anh Hoang; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; John C Araujo; Amado J Zurita; Paul G Corn; Lance Pagliaro; Jeri Kim; Jennifer Wang; Sumit K Subudhi; Nizar M Tannir; Christopher J Logothetis; Patricia Troncoso; Sijin Wen; Eleni Efstathiou
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Systemic Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Elderly Patients: Current Role and Safety Considerations of Androgen-Targeting Strategies.

Authors:  Myrto Boukovala; Nicholas Spetsieris; Eleni Efstathiou
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  PARP inhibitors as a new therapeutic option in metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raffaele Ratta; Annalisa Guida; Florian Scotté; Yann Neuzillet; Asmahane Benmaziane Teillet; Thierry Lebret; Philippe Beuzeboc
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Combining prostate cancer radiotherapy with therapies targeting the androgen receptor axis.

Authors:  M Ghashghaei; M Kucharczyk; S Elakshar; T Muanza; T Niazi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Conceptual review of key themes in treating prostate cancer in older adults.

Authors:  Ramy Sedhom; Arjun Gupta
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Quality of Life-Focused Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Shevach; Adam Weiner; Alicia K Morgans
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  M0CRPC overview of management options.

Authors:  Y Hess-Busch; B Hadaschik; J Hess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Effectiveness of Vintage Hormone Therapy as Alternative Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Kano; Takafumi Shimada; Renato Naito; Tomoyuki Makino; Suguru Kadamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadonoa; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Androgen receptor variant-driven prostate cancer II: advances in clinical investigation.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Jun Luo; Andrew J Armstrong; Landon C Brown; Changxue Lu
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.