OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the agreement between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography for the characterization of extremity fractures and to compare image quality, radiation dose, and patient tolerance. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with suspected fracture affecting distal extremities or who required preoperative fracture assessment were enrolled prospectively. Each patient underwent CBCT and multislice computed tomography the same day. Both examinations were evaluated independently twice by 2 trained radiologists using the Müller AO classification for fracture characterization. RESULTS: Cohen κ coefficient for agreement between the imaging techniques was almost perfect for fracture characterization, κ = 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.98]. There was substantial to almost perfect agreement for secondary findings. Cone-beam computed tomography was well tolerated and significantly less irradiant and had better subjective image. CONCLUSIONS: An excellent agreement between both imaging techniques was found. This confirms the ability of CBCT to assess fractures and its potential in the management of patients with distal limb trauma.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the agreement between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography for the characterization of extremity fractures and to compare image quality, radiation dose, and patient tolerance. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with suspected fracture affecting distal extremities or who required preoperative fracture assessment were enrolled prospectively. Each patient underwent CBCT and multislice computed tomography the same day. Both examinations were evaluated independently twice by 2 trained radiologists using the Müller AO classification for fracture characterization. RESULTS: Cohen κ coefficient for agreement between the imaging techniques was almost perfect for fracture characterization, κ = 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.98]. There was substantial to almost perfect agreement for secondary findings. Cone-beam computed tomography was well tolerated and significantly less irradiant and had better subjective image. CONCLUSIONS: An excellent agreement between both imaging techniques was found. This confirms the ability of CBCT to assess fractures and its potential in the management of patients with distal limb trauma.