Asad Jehangir1, Henry P Parkman. 1. Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
GOAL: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship of reflux with gastroparesis (Gp), looking both at symptoms and objective testing. BACKGROUND: Gp patients often experience gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. How the severity of reflux correlates with the severity of Gp is not known. STUDY: Patients referred to our academic center with symptoms of Gp completed the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-15. They underwent 4-hour gastric emptying scintigraphy; and, if indicated, high-resolution esophageal manometry and esophageal pH impedance (EpHI). RESULTS: Of 755 patients from July 2013 to May 2018, 432 had Gp with Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) total score of 3.2±0.1 (mean±SEM) and heartburn/regurgitation subscore of 2.0±0.1. A fourth (27.1%) of all Gp patients had moderate to very severe heartburn/regurgitation symptoms. Heartburn/regurgitation subscore had strong correlation with GSCI total score (r=0.56, P<0.01), and weak correlation with 4-hour gastric retention (r=0.11, P=0.02). In total, 103 Gp patients underwent EpHI monitoring; time esophageal pH<4 had no correlation with heartburn/regurgitation subscore. Less than half (41.7%) of the patients undergoing EpHI had gastroesophageal reflux disease by EpHI. Gp patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease had more severe 4-hour gastric retention, and more frequently had decreased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and esophageal motility disorders. Heartburn/regurgitation subscore had moderate correlation with somatic symptoms, and weak correlations with anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of reflux symptoms in Gp has strong correlation with GCSI total score, weak correlation with gastric retention, and no correlation with esophageal pH monitoring.
GOAL: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship of reflux with gastroparesis (Gp), looking both at symptoms and objective testing. BACKGROUND: Gp patients often experience gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. How the severity of reflux correlates with the severity of Gp is not known. STUDY: Patients referred to our academic center with symptoms of Gp completed the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-15. They underwent 4-hour gastric emptying scintigraphy; and, if indicated, high-resolution esophageal manometry and esophageal pH impedance (EpHI). RESULTS: Of 755 patients from July 2013 to May 2018, 432 had Gp with Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) total score of 3.2±0.1 (mean±SEM) and heartburn/regurgitation subscore of 2.0±0.1. A fourth (27.1%) of all Gp patients had moderate to very severe heartburn/regurgitation symptoms. Heartburn/regurgitation subscore had strong correlation with GSCI total score (r=0.56, P<0.01), and weak correlation with 4-hour gastric retention (r=0.11, P=0.02). In total, 103 Gp patients underwent EpHI monitoring; time esophageal pH<4 had no correlation with heartburn/regurgitation subscore. Less than half (41.7%) of the patients undergoing EpHI had gastroesophageal reflux disease by EpHI. Gp patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease had more severe 4-hour gastric retention, and more frequently had decreased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and esophageal motility disorders. Heartburn/regurgitation subscore had moderate correlation with somatic symptoms, and weak correlations with anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of reflux symptoms in Gp has strong correlation with GCSI total score, weak correlation with gastric retention, and no correlation with esophageal pH monitoring.
Authors: Motasem Alkhayyat; Vedha Sanghi; Thabet Qapaja; Robert Butler; Carol Rouphael; John McMichael; John Goldblum; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Prashanthi N Thota Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 3.429