Literature DB >> 30762259

Natalizumab, rituximab and fingolimod as escalation therapy in multiple sclerosis.

M Boremalm1, A Juto2, M Axelsson3, L Novakova3, T Frisell4, A Svenningsson5, J Lycke3, F Piehl6, J Salzer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Breakthrough disease on first-line injectables in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a common clinical situation where comparative studies between different escalation therapies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and medication persistence of natalizumab (NTZ), rituximab (RTX) and fingolimod (FGL) as escalation therapy in RRMS.
METHODS: Patients switching from interferon or glatiramer acetate to NTZ, RTX or FGL due to breakthrough disease were identified through the Swedish multiple sclerosis (MS) registry at four large MS centers in this retrospective observational study. Data were collected from the MS registry and medical charts. Hazard ratios (HRs) for relapses, adverse events and drug discontinuation with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using multivariable confounder-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were included. The annualized relapse rates were 0.02 for NTZ, 0.03 for RTX and 0.07 for FGL. Compared with NTZ, the adjusted HR for relapse was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.2-5.6) for RTX and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.3-9.2) for FGL. The annualized drug discontinuation rates were 0.15, 0.01 and 0.15 for NTZ, RTX and FGL, respectively. The adjusted HR for drug discontinuation was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.38) for RTX and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.7) for FGL vs. NTZ.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RRMS on interferon/glatiramer acetate with breakthrough disease, switching to NTZ or RTX was associated with less disease activity compared with FGL. RTX displayed superior medication persistence compared with both NTZ and FGL.
© 2019 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  escalation therapy; fingolimod; natalizumab; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; rituximab

Year:  2019        PMID: 30762259     DOI: 10.1111/ene.13936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  9 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehdi Rezaee; Mohammad Hossein Morowvat; Maryam Poursadeghfard; Armin Radgoudarzi; Khosro Keshavarz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Graziella Filippini; Jera Kruja; Cinzia Del Giovane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab Versus Anti-CD20 in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis After Fingolimod Withdrawal.

Authors:  Fabien Rollot; Justine Couturier; Romain Casey; Sandrine Wiertlewski; Marc Debouverie; Jean Pelletier; Jérôme De Sèze; Pierre Labauge; Aurélie Ruet; Eric Thouvenot; Jonathan Ciron; Eric Berger; Olivier Gout; Pierre Clavelou; Bruno Stankoff; Olivier Casez; Bertrand Bourre; Hélène Zephir; Thibault Moreau; Christine Lebrun-Frenay; Elisabeth Maillart; Gilles Edan; Jean-Philippe Neau; Alexis Montcuquet; Philippe Cabre; Jean-Philippe Camdessanché; Gilles Defer; Haifa Ben Nasr; Aude Maurousset; Karolina Hankiewicz; Corinne Pottier; Emmanuelle Leray; Sandra Vukusic; David-Axel Laplaud
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.088

4.  A comparative study of tolerability and effects on immunoglobulin levels and CD19 cell counts with ocrelizumab vs low dose of rituximab in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Björn Evertsson; Tammy Hoyt; Angel Christensen; Faiez Al Nimer; John Foley; Fredrik Piehl
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Comparison of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Fingolimod and Rituximab vs Natalizumab for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jue Hou; Nicole Kim; Tianrun Cai; Kumar Dahal; Howard Weiner; Tanuja Chitnis; Tianxi Cai; Zongqi Xia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 6.  Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?

Authors:  Serena Brancati; Lucia Gozzo; Laura Longo; Daniela Cristina Vitale; Filippo Drago
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.

Authors:  Brandi L Vollmer; Kavita Nair; Stefan Sillau; John R Corboy; Timothy Vollmer; Enrique Alvarez
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 8.  Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review.

Authors:  Clara Grazia Chisari; Eleonora Sgarlata; Sebastiano Arena; Simona Toscano; Maria Luca; Francesco Patti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.682

9.  Risk of depression in multiple sclerosis across disease-modifying therapies.

Authors:  Elisa Longinetti; Thomas Frisell; Simon Englund; Johan Reutfors; Fang Fang; Fredrik Piehl
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.312

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.