Literature DB >> 30761584

Machine learning model to predict recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients with history of idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding.

Grace Lai-Hung Wong1,2, Andy Jinhua Ma3,4, Huiqi Deng3,5, Jessica Yuet-Ling Ching1,2, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong1,2, Yee-Kit Tse1,2, Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip1,2, Louis Ho-Shing Lau1,2, Henry Hin-Wai Liu6, Chi-Man Leung7, Steven Woon-Choy Tsang8, Chun-Wing Chan9, James Yun-Wong Lau10, Pong-Chi Yuen3, Francis Ka-Leung Chan1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers have an increased risk of recurring ulcer complications. AIM: To build a machine learning model to identify patients at high risk for recurrent ulcer bleeding.
METHODS: Data from a retrospective cohort of 22 854 patients (training cohort) diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease in 2007-2016 were analysed to build a model (IPU-ML) to predict recurrent ulcer bleeding. We tested the IPU-ML in all patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1265) in 2008-2015 from a different catchment population (independent validation cohort). Any co-morbid conditions which had occurred in >1% of study population were eligible as predictors.
RESULTS: Recurrent ulcer bleeding developed in 4772 patients (19.5%) in the training cohort, during a median follow-up period of 2.7 years. IPU-ML model built on six parameters (age, baseline haemoglobin, and presence of gastric ulcer, gastrointestinal diseases, malignancies, and infections) identified patients with bleeding recurrence within 1 year with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.648. When we set the IPU-ML cutoff value at 0.20, 27.5% of patients were classified as high risk for rebleeding with a sensitivity of 41.4%, specificity of 74.6%, and a negative predictive value of 91.1%. In the validation cohort, the IPU-ML identified patients with a recurrence ulcer bleeding within 1 year with an AUROC of 0.775, and 84.3% of overall accuracy.
CONCLUSION: We developed a machine-learning model to identify those patients with a history of idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding who are not at high risk for recurrent ulcer bleeding.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30761584     DOI: 10.1111/apt.15145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  10 in total

Review 1.  Application Status and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Peptic Ulcers.

Authors:  Peng-Yue Zhao; Ke Han; Ren-Qi Yao; Chao Ren; Xiao-Hui Du
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Artificial Intelligence for Understanding Imaging, Text, and Data in Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-07

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Management of Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Sobia Mujtaba; Saurabh Chawla; Julia Fayez Massaad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Novel machine learning models outperform risk scores in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

Authors:  Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Vicki Wing-Ki Hui; Qingxiong Tan; Jingwen Xu; Hye Won Lee; Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip; Baoyao Yang; Yee-Kit Tse; Chong Yin; Fei Lyu; Jimmy Che-To Lai; Grace Chung-Yan Lui; Henry Lik-Yuen Chan; Pong-Chi Yuen; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2022-01-22

5.  Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Yongkang Lai; Yuling Xu; Zhenhua Zhu; Xiaolin Pan; Shunhua Long; Wangdi Liao; Bimin Li; Yin Zhu; Youxiang Chen; Xu Shu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Utility of a deep learning model and a clinical model for predicting bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Eun Na; Yeong Chan Lee; Tae Jun Kim; Hyuk Lee; Hong-Hee Won; Yang Won Min; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.374

7.  Risk Prediction of Barrett's Esophagus in a Taiwanese Health Examination Center Based on Regression Models.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Lin; Jer-Guang Hsieh; Hsien-Chung Yu; Jyh-Horng Jeng; Chiao-Lin Hsu; Chien-Hua Chen; Pin-Chieh Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in small intestinal diseases: Application and prospects.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Yu-Xuan Li; Ren-Qi Yao; Xiao-Hui Du; Chao Ren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  A technical review of artificial intelligence as applied to gastrointestinal endoscopy: clarifying the terminology.

Authors:  Alanna Ebigbo; Christoph Palm; Andreas Probst; Robert Mendel; Johannes Manzeneder; Friederike Prinz; Luis A de Souza; João P Papa; Peter Siersema; Helmut Messmann
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 10.  WSES project on decision support systems based on artificial neural networks in emergency surgery.

Authors:  Andrey Litvin; Sergey Korenev; Sophiya Rumovskaya; Massimo Sartelli; Gianluca Baiocchi; Walter L Biffl; Federico Coccolini; Salomone Di Saverio; Michael Denis Kelly; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppäniemi; Michael Sugrue; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 5.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.