| Literature DB >> 30761308 |
Toshiyuki Nishikido1,2, Kausik K Ray1.
Abstract
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is one of the principal risk factors for atherosclerosis. Circulating LDL particles can penetrate into the sub-endothelial space of arterial walls. These particles undergo oxidation and promote an inflammatory response, resulting in injury to the vascular endothelial wall. Persistent elevation of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is linked to the progression of fatty streaks to lipid-rich plaque and thus atherosclerosis. LDL-C is a causal factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and lowering it is beneficial across a range of conditions associated with high risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, all guidelines-recommended initiations of statin therapy for patients at high cardiovascular risk is irrespective of LDL-C. In addition, intensive LDL-C lowering therapy with statins has been demonstrated to result in a greater reduction of cardiovascular event risk in large clinical trials. However, many high-risk patients receiving statins fail to achieve the guideline-recommended reduction in LDL-C levels in routine clinical practice. Moreover, low levels of adherence and often high rates of discontinuation demand the need for further therapies. Ezetimibe has typically been used as a complement to statins when further LDL-C reduction is required. More recently, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) has emerged as a novel therapeutic target for lowering LDL-C levels, with PCSK9 inhibitors offering greater reductions than feasible through the addition of ezetimibe. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have been shown to not only considerably lower LDL-C levels but also cardiovascular events. However, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies require once- or twice-monthly subcutaneous injections. Further, their manufacturing process is expensive, increasing the cost of therapy. Therefore, several non-antibody treatments to inhibit PCSK9 function are being developed as alternative approaches to monoclonal antibodies. These include gene-silencing or editing technologies, such as antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA, and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 platform; small-molecule inhibitors; mimetic peptides; adnectins; and vaccination. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge base on the role of PCSK9 in lipid metabolism and an overview of non-antibody approaches for PCSK9 inhibition and their limitations. The subsequent development of alternative approaches to PCSK9 inhibition may give us more affordable and convenient therapeutic options for the management of high-risk patients.Entities:
Keywords: LDL cholesterol; PCKS9 inhibition; adverse effect; monoclonal antibody; statin
Year: 2019 PMID: 30761308 PMCID: PMC6361748 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1The role of PCSK9 in lipoprotein metabolism. The expression of LDLR and PCSK9 are regulated by SREBP-2. The PCSK9 secreted from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus, and then from trans-Golgi network into the medium. It can be sorted directly to lysosomes as a complex with the LDLR (intracellular pathway), or secreted into the plasma and then internalized with the LDLR into clathrin-coated endosomes for lysosomal degradation (Extracellular pathway). Both mechanisms result in the reduction of LDLR, and then LDL clearance from the circulation is reduced.; LDL-R, LDL receptor; SREBP-2, Sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl coenzyme A.
Figure 2The synthesize of PCSK9 protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. PCSK9 comprises a single peptide (amino acid 1-30), a prodomain (amino acid 31-152), a catalytic domain (amino acid 153-452), and Cysteine-Histidine rich C-terminal domain (amino acid 453-692). In endoplasmic reticulum, proPCSK9 undergoes autocatalytic cleavage and the prodomain is separated from the mature PCSK9. The prodomain remains associated with the catalytic fragment, which inhibits the protease activity of the mature protein.; aa, amino acid.
Figure 3The extracellular mechanisms of PCSK9 inhibition. The strategies that target the binding between PCSK9 and LDLR extracellularly include PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, adnectin (BMS-962476), mimetic peptides, and small molecules. By blocking PCSK9, these PCSK9 inhibitors increase LDLR recycling and LDL uptake; LDLR, LDL receptor.
Figure 4The intracellular mechanisms of PCSK9 inhibition. The strategies that target the expression and secretion of PCSK9 intracellularly include antisense oligonucleotide, siRNA, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, and small molecules; mRNA, messenger RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA; CPRISPER-Cas9, Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9; GalNAc, N-acetylgalactosamine; Q3G, quercetin-3-O-beta-glucoside; RNaseH, Ribonuclease H.
The comparison among different approaches to PCSK9 inhibition.
| Structure | Monoclonal antibody | Double-stranded RNA | Single-stranded RNA | Protein | Peptide | Protein | Peptide |
| Administration | Once or Twice monthly, Subcutaneous injection | Twice yearly, Subcutaneous injection | Monthly, Subcutaneous injection | Daily, Oral administration | Injection administration | Subcutaneous or intravenous injection | Once yearly, Subcutaneous injection |
| Mechanism to action | Blocking the extracellular interaction of PCSK9 with LDLR | PCSK9 synthesis inhibition through RNA interference | PCSK9 synthesis inhibition through RNA interference | Blocking the intracellular or extracellular interaction between PCSK9 and enzyme or receptor | Blocking the extracellular inter action between PCSK9 and LDLR | Blocking the extracellular interaction of PCSK9 with LDLR | Eliciting production of autoantibodies against PCSK9 |
| Efficacy | LDL-C 60%, PCSK9 60% reduction | LDL-C 50%, PCSK9 70% reduction | LDL-C 25–50%, PCSK9 50–85% reduction (Clinical + preclinical results) | LDL-C 50–60% reduction | LDLR 50% reduction (Preclinical results) | LDL-C 50%, PCSK9 > 90% reduction | LDL-C 50%, PCSK9 60% reduction (Only preclinical results) |
| Advantage | High specificity, No serious adverse reaction | High specificity, Infrequent dosing, Long-term effect, No serious adverse reaction | High specificity | Oral administration, Easy production, Low cost | High specificity, Easy production | High specificity, Easy production, Low cost | Long-term effect, Infrequent dosing, Easy production, Low cost |
| Disadvantage | Frequent subcutaneous dosing, Short shelf life, High cost | Subcutaneous dosing | Serious renal adverse event | Low selectivity, Non-tissue specific effect | Intravenous dosing | Frequent subcutaneous or intravenous dosing, Short half-life | Subcutaneous dosing |
| Current phase | Approved | Phase 3 on going | Phase 1 (terminated) | Phase 1 | Preclinical | Phase 1 | Phase 1 on gong |
| References | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( |
MAbs, monoclonal antibody; siRNA, small interfering RNA; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; LDLR, LDL receptor.
The adverse effects in clinical trials.
| MAbs | Alirocumab | 1942/2476 (78.4%) | 387/2476 (15.6%) | 183/2476 (7.4%) | AST, ALT > 3× ULN: 1.4%, 1.8% | ( |
| vs. 1004/1276 (78.7%) | vs. 205/1276 (16.1%) | vs. 67/1276 (5.3%) | CK > 3× ULN: 3.6% | |||
| Evolocumab | 2016/3946 (51.1%) | 110/3946 (2.8%) | 131/3946 (3.3%) | AST or ALT > 3× ULN: 0.4% | ( | |
| vs. 1031/2080 (49.6%) | vs. 43/2080 (2.1%) | vs. 63/2080 (3.0%) | CK > 5× ULN: 0.7% | |||
| siRNA | Inclisiran | 282/370 (76.2%) | 41/370 (11.1%) | 19/370 (5.1%) | AST, ALT > 3× ULN: 0.3%, 0.8% | ( |
| vs. 96/127 (75.6%) | vs. 9/127 (7.1%) | vs. 0/127 (0%) | CK > 5× ULN: 1.4% | |||
| ASO | SPC5001 | Acute kidney injury | 8/18 (44%) | Serum creatinine 18% increase | ( | |
| Adnectin | BMS-962476 | 31/64 (48.4%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | No remarkable findings | ( | |
| Cerebrovascular event |
vs. Placebo.
Treatment emergent adverse events.
AEs, adverse events; SAEs, serious adverse events; ULN, upper limit of normal. MAbs, monoclonal antibodies; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; siRNA, small interfering RNA. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine transaminase; CK, creatine kinase.