| Literature DB >> 30761272 |
Neha M Sahasrabudhe1, Joost C van der Horst1, Vivian Spaans2,3, Gemma Kenter4, Cor de Kroon3, Tjalling Bosse2, Sandra J van Vliet1, Ekaterina S Jordanova2,4.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer type in women worldwide and is characterized by a highly immune-suppressive microenvironment. Here, we describe aberrant glycosylation as a factor mediating this immunosuppressive microenvironment. Expression of a specific carbohydrate ligand for the immune-regulatory C-type lectin MGL was correlated to poor disease-specific survival and distant recurrences in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), the most common histological subtypes of cervical cancer. MGL ligand expression was also associated with lymph node metastasis, the absence of CD14+ myeloid cells and the presence of CD14-CD163+ myeloid cells. Indeed, expression of the MGL receptor itself could be detected on CD163+ cells, suggesting that MGL+ myeloid cells are able to interact locally with MGL ligand+ tumor cells. Additionally, MGL ligand expression correlated to the occurrence of PIK3CA mutations, the most frequently observed oncogenic alteration in cervical cancer. In conclusion, we present prognostic value for MGL ligand expression in SCC/ASC patients, which further supports an immune evasive role for the C-type lectin MGL in the tumor immune compartment.Entities:
Keywords: MGL; cervical cancer; distant metastasis; glycosylation; histological subtype
Year: 2019 PMID: 30761272 PMCID: PMC6361794 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1MGL ligand expression in cervical cancer. Representative images of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), and adenocarcinoma (AC) cervical cancer tissues stained with a chimeric MGL-mouseFc protein. MGL ligand expression was labeled positive or negative/weak based on the intensity of MGL-mouseFc binding. Magnification 20x.
Clinicopathologic characteristics of the studied cohort (n = 96) in relation to MGL-ligand expression.
| Negative | 7 (7.3) | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | |
| 16 | 50 (52.1) | 35 (70) | 15 (30) | |
| 18 | 20 (20.8) | 14 (70) | 6 (30) | |
| Other | 16 (16.7) | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 0.1 |
| Unknown | 3 (3.1) | |||
| IB1 | 45 (46.9) | 29 (64.4) | 16 (35.6) | |
| IB2 | 31 (32.3) | 22 (71) | 9 (29) | |
| IIA | 20 (20.8) | 14 (70) | 6 (30) | 0.8 |
| SCC | 59 (61.5) | 34 (57.6) | 25 (42.4) | |
| ASC | 23 (24) | 18 (78.3) | 5 (21.7) | |
| AC | 14 (14.6) | 13 (92.9) | 1 (7.1) | |
| <40 mm | 54 (56.3) | 38 (70.4) | 16 (29.6) | |
| ≥40 mm | 37 (38.5) | 22 (59.5) | 15 (40.5) | |
| Unknown | 5 (5.2) | 0.3 | ||
| <15 mm | 51 (53.1) | 38 (74.5) | 13 (25.5) | |
| ≥15 mm | 45 (46.9) | 27 (60) | 18 (40) | 0.1 |
| Negative | 86 (89.6) | 60 (69.8) | 26 (30.2) | |
| Positive | 10 (10.4) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | 0.2 |
| Negative | 45 (46.9) | 33 (73.3) | 12 (26.7) | |
| Positive | 48 (50) | 29 (60.4) | 19 (39.6) | 0.2 |
| Unknown | 3 (3.1) | |||
| Negative | 70 (72.9) | 51 (72.9) | 19 (27.1) | |
| Positive | 26 (27.1) | 14 (53.8) | 12 (46.2) | |
| Yes | 54 (56.3) | 32 (59.3) | 22 (40.7) | 0.05 |
| No | 42 (43.7) | 33 (78.6) | 9 (21.4) | |
P-value obtained with the Chi-square test.
Statistical values in SCC/ASC patient subgroup. HPV, human papillomavirus; FIGO, international federation of gynecology and Obstetrics stage for cervical carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ASC, adenosquamous carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma. Bold values signify significance.
Figure 2MGL ligand expression correlates to lower survival in patients with distant recurrence. Kaplan Meier survival curves were plotted for SCC/AC patients for Disease-specific survival (A), Locoregional recurrence (B), and Distant recurrence (C). P-values determined by Log rank test.
Figure 3MGL expression in Cervical Squamous cell carcinoma. MGL receptor (red), CD163 (green, myeloid cells) staining in formalin fixed tumor tissue. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (in blue).
MGL ligand expression in relation to mutational status.
| No | 56 (68.3) | 40 (71.4) | 16 (28.6) | |
| Yes | 26 (31.7) | 12 (46.1) | 14 (53.8) | 0.027 |
| No | 63 (76.8) | 45 (71.4) | 18 (28.6) | |
| Yes | 19 (23.2) | 7 (36.8) | 12 (63.2) | 0.006 |
Total number of cases = 82.
P-value obtained with the Chi-square test.