Literature DB >> 30760625

Institutional and provider variations for mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a survey analysis.

Tapan Mehta1, Shailesh Male1, Coridon Quinn1, David F Kallmes2, Adnan H Siddiqui3, Aquilla Turk4, Andrew Walker Grande1, Ramachandra Prasad Tummala1, Bharathi Dasan Jagadeesan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stent retriever combined with aspiration, or the 'Solumbra technique', has recently emerged as one of the popular methods of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, the variations in understanding and implementation of the Solumbra technique have not been reported.
METHODS: An 18 part anonymous survey questionnaire was designed to extract information regarding technical variations of MT with a focus on the Solumbra technique. The survey link was posted on the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery (SNIS) website in 'SNIS connect'.
RESULTS: 80 responses were obtained over 4 weeks that were included in the final analysis. Direct aspiration without a balloon guide catheter (BGC) was the most favored technique among respondents (41.12%) followed by the Solumbra technique without a BGC (32.4%). Among those using the Solumbra technique, 77.6% reported that they wait between 2 and 5 min to allow clot engagement, 55.2% always remove the microcatheter before aspiration, and 69.1% commence aspiration through the intermediate catheter only when retrieving the stent retriever. Operators who infrequently used or did not use BGCs reported a higher incidence of >80% Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3 annual recanalization rates (OR 8.85, 95% CI 2.03 to 38.55, P=0.004) compared with those who consistently used BGCs.
CONCLUSION: Our study documents the variations in MT techniques, and more specifically, attempts to quantify variations in the Solumbra technique. The impact of these variations on recanalization rates and eventually patient outcomes are unclear, especially given the self-reported outcomes contained in this study. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  stroke; thrombectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30760625     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

1.  Balloon guide catheters: use, reject, or randomize?

Authors:  Mayank Goyal; Manon Kappelhof; Johanna M Ospel; Fouzi Bala
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Tasneem F Hasan; Nathaniel Todnem; Neethu Gopal; David A Miller; Sukhwinder S Sandhu; Josephine F Huang; Rabih G Tawk
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Understanding the Radial Force of Stroke Thrombectomy Devices to Minimize Vessel Wall Injury: Mechanical Bench Testing of the Radial Force Generated by a Novel Braided Thrombectomy Assist Device Compared to Laser-Cut Stent Retrievers in Simulated MCA Vessel Diameters.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Katz; Abdullah M Hakoun; Amir R Dehdashti; Alex B Chebl; Vikram Janardhan; Vallabh Janardhan
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Effect of Standardized Perioperative Management on EEG Indexes and Nerve and Limb Functions of Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Yu Gong; Jie Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Clot composition of embolic strokes of undetermined source: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Amre Nouh; Tapan Mehta; Mohamed Hussain; Xianyuan Song; Martin Ollenschleger
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.474

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.