| Literature DB >> 30760120 |
Bernard Freudenthal1, Samiksha Shetty1, Natalie C Butterfield1, John G Logan1, Cho Rong Han2, Xuguang Zhu2, Inna Astapova3, Anthony N Hollenberg4, Sheue-Yann Cheng2, J H Duncan Bassett1, Graham R Williams1.
Abstract
Background: Thyroid hormones act in bone and <span class="Disease">cartilage via <span class="Gene">thyroid hormone receptor alpha (TRα). In the absence of triiodothyronine (T3), TRα interacts with co-repressors, including nuclear receptor co-repressor-1 (NCoR1), which recruit histone deacetylases (HDACs) and mediate transcriptional repression. Dominant-negative mutations of TRα cause resistance to thyroid hormone alpha (RTHα; OMIM 614450), characterized by excessive repression of T3 target genes leading to delayed skeletal development, growth retardation, and bone dysplasia. Treatment with thyroxine has been of limited benefit, even in mildly affected individuals, and there is a need for new therapeutic strategies. It was hypothesized that (i) the skeletal manifestations of RTHα are mediated by the persistent TRα/NCoR1/HDAC repressor complex containing mutant TRα, and (ii) treatment with the HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) would ameliorate these manifestations.Entities:
Keywords: NCoR1; RTH-α; bone; thyroid hormone receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30760120 PMCID: PMC6533791 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2018.0399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thyroid ISSN: 1050-7256 Impact factor: 6.568

Disruption of the interaction between nuclear receptor co-repressor-1 (NcoR1) and thyroid hormone receptor alpha (TRα) ameliorates the skeletal phenotype in Thra1 mice. (A) X-ray microradiography images of femurs from male wild-type (WT), Thra1, and Thra1 mice at 14 weeks of age. Gray-scale images and pseudocolored images in which low bone mineral content (BMC) is indicated in green and high BMC in pink. Cumulative frequency histogram of relative BMC (n = 5–8 per group). ***p < 0.001 vs. WT; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Graphs show lengths of femurs, humeri, and vertebrae. Data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM; n = 4–8 per group). **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001; analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. (B) Micro computed tomography (micro-CT) images of mid-diaphysis cortical bone. Graphs showing cortical thickness (Ct.Th), cortical bone mineral density (BMD), and cortical porosity (Ct.Po). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group apart from Ct.Po, n = 3). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01; ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. (C) Micro-CT images of distal femur trabecular bone. Graphs showing trabecular bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001; ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. (D) Representative load displacement curves for humerus three-point bend testing. Yield load, maximum load, fracture load, and stiffness. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001; ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Scale bars in (A), (B) and (C) = 1 mm. Data from the same group of untreated WT mice are included in Figures 1–4 to facilitate comparison across groups. Color images are available online.

Disruption of the interaction between NcoR1 and TRα increases bone mass, mineralization, and strength in WT mice. (A) X-ray microradiography images of femurs from male WT and NCoR1 mice at 14 weeks of age. Gray-scale images and pseudocolored images in which low BMC is indicated in green and high BMC in pink. Cumulative frequency histogram of relative BMC (n = 6–8 per group). ***p < 0.001 vs. WT; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Graphs show lengths of femurs, humeri, and vertebrae. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group); Student's t-test. (B) Micro-CT images of mid-diaphysis cortical bone. Graphs showing Ct.Th, cortical BMD, and Ct.Po. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group apart from Ct.Po, n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001; Student's t-test. (C) Micro-CT images of distal femur trabecular bone. Graphs showing BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group). (D) Representative load displacement curves for humerus three-point bend testing. Yield load, maximum load, fracture load, and stiffness. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 vs. WT; Student's t-test. Scale bars in (A), (B) and (C) = 1 mm. Data from the same group of untreated WT mice are included in Figures 1–4 to facilitate comparison across groups. Color images are available online.

Treatment with suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) has no effect on bone mass, mineralization, or strength in WT or Thra1 mice. (A) X-ray microradiography images of femurs from male WT, SAHA-treated WT (WT SAHA), Thra1, and SAHA-treated Thra1 (Thra1 SAHA) mice at 14 weeks of age. Gray-scale images and pseudocolored images in which low BMC is indicated in green and high BMC in pink. Cumulative frequency histogram of relative BMC (n = 5–8 per group). **p < 0.01 SAHA treated vs. untreated; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Graphs show lengths of femurs, humeri, and vertebrae. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group), treated vs. untreated; Student's t-test. (B) Micro-CT images of mid-diaphysis cortical bone. Graphs showing Ct.Th, cortical BMD, and Ct.Po. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group apart from Ct.Po, n = 3). (C) Micro-CT images of distal femur trabecular bone. Graphs showing BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 per group). (D) Representative load displacement curves for humerus three-point bend testing. Yield load, maximum load, fracture load, and stiffness. Data are the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 5–8 per group); treated vs. untreated. Scale bars in (A), (B) and (C) = 1 mm. Data from the same group of untreated WT mice are included in Figures 1–4 to facilitate comparison across groups. Color images are available online.

Treatment with SAHA has no effect on bone mass, mineralization, or strength in NCoR1 or Thra1 mice. (A) X-ray microradiography images of femurs from male WT, NCoR1, SAHA-treated NCoR1 (NCoR1 SAHA), Thra1, and SAHA-treated Thra1 (Thra1 SAHA) mice at 14 weeks of age. Gray-scale images and pseudocolored images in which low BMC is indicated in green and high BMC in pink. Cumulative frequency histogram of relative BMC (n = 6–8 per group). SAHA treated vs. untreated; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Graphs show femur, humerus and vertebral lengths. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group); treated vs. untreated. **p < 0.01; Student's t-test. (B) Micro-CT images of mid-diaphysis cortical bone. Graphs showing Ct.Th, cortical BMD, and Ct.Po. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group apart from Ct.Po, n = 3). (C) Micro-CT images of distal femur trabecular bone. Graphs showing BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group). (D) Representative load displacement curves for humerus three-point bend testing. Yield load, maximum load, fracture load, and stiffness. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 6–8 per group); treated vs. untreated. Scale bars in (A), (B) and (C) = 1 mm. Data from the same group of untreated WT mice are included in Figures 1–4 to facilitate comparison across groups. Color images are available online.