U Nöth1, T Geiser2, T Kranich2, E von Rottkay2, J C Reichert2, M Reyle-Hahn3, L Rackwitz2. 1. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland. ulrich.noeth@pgdiakonie.de. 2. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Anästhesie und interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fast track arthroplasty is becoming increasingly accepted in German-speaking countries. By optimizing treatment processes fast track programs promise faster recovery, increased patient satisfaction, quality improvement and reduction in the length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVES: The philosophy and treatment principles of fast track hip arthroplasty during the pre, intra and postoperative phase are described in the light of the current body of evidence. The challenges concerning fast track arthroplasty within the German health system are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Besides presenting our own data concerning a patient seminar and an opiate saving pain treatment, the most relevant literature related to fast track hip arthroplasty from a pubmed search is discussed. RESULTS: Fast track concepts can only be successfully implemented through close interdisciplinary team work. Preoperatively, a patient seminar can help to prepare patients better for surgery. Postoperatively, early mobilisation and pain treatment play a central role, whereat a clear reduction in opiate application can be achieved. CONCLUSION: Fast track hip arthroplasty makes rethinking with respect to traditional treatment principles necessary and demands a high degree of interdisciplinary team work. Particularly, as result of the specifics of the health system (DRG system and stationary rehabilitation), a nationwide establishment in Germany has not taken place so far.
BACKGROUND: Fast track arthroplasty is becoming increasingly accepted in German-speaking countries. By optimizing treatment processes fast track programs promise faster recovery, increased patient satisfaction, quality improvement and reduction in the length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVES: The philosophy and treatment principles of fast track hip arthroplasty during the pre, intra and postoperative phase are described in the light of the current body of evidence. The challenges concerning fast track arthroplasty within the German health system are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Besides presenting our own data concerning a patient seminar and an opiate saving pain treatment, the most relevant literature related to fast track hip arthroplasty from a pubmed search is discussed. RESULTS: Fast track concepts can only be successfully implemented through close interdisciplinary team work. Preoperatively, a patient seminar can help to prepare patients better for surgery. Postoperatively, early mobilisation and pain treatment play a central role, whereat a clear reduction in opiate application can be achieved. CONCLUSION: Fast track hip arthroplasty makes rethinking with respect to traditional treatment principles necessary and demands a high degree of interdisciplinary team work. Particularly, as result of the specifics of the health system (DRG system and stationary rehabilitation), a nationwide establishment in Germany has not taken place so far.
Entities:
Keywords:
DRG; Early mobilization; Education, patient; Fast track; Postoperative pain; Total hip replacement