Robert A Waeiss1, Christopher P Knight2, Sheketha R Hauser2, Lauren A Pratt1, William J McBride2, Zachary A Rodd3. 1. Program in Medical Neuroscience, Paul and Carole Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Neuroscience Research Building, 320 W. 15th Street, Suite 300B, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-2266, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Neuroscience Research Building, 320 W. 15th Street, Suite 300B, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-2266, USA. zrodd@iupui.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous alcohol and nicotine consumption occurs in the majority of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and nicotine dependence. Varenicline (Var) is used to assist in the cessation of nicotine use, while naltrexone (Nal) is the standard treatment for AUD. Despite evidence that ethanol (EtOH) and nicotine (NIC) co-use produces unique neuroadaptations, preclinical research has focused on the effects of pharmacotherapeutics on a single reinforcer. The current experiments examined the effects of Var and Nal on EtOH, NIC, or EtOH+NIC intake. METHODS: Animals were randomly assigned to one of four drinking conditions of 24-h access to a three-bottle choice paradigm, one of which always contained water. Drinking conditions were water only, 0.07 and 0.14 mg/mL NIC (NIC only), 15% and 30% EtOH (EtOH only), or 15% and 30% EtOH with 0.14 mg/mL NIC (EtOH+NIC). The effects of Var (0, 1, or 2 mg/kg) or Nal (0, 1, or 10 mg/kg) injections on maintenance and relapse consumption were determined during four consecutive days. RESULTS: Var reduced maintenance and relapse NIC intake but had no effect on EtOH or EtOH+NIC drinking. Conversely, Nal reduced EtOH maintenance and relapse drinking, but had no effect on NIC or EtOH+NIC drinking. DISCUSSION: The results indicate the standard pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and AUD were effective at reducing consumption of the targeted reinforcer but neither reduced EtOH+NIC co-use/abuse. These findings suggest that co-abuse may promote unique neuroadaptations that require models of polysubstance abuse to develop pharmacotherapeutics to treat AUD and nicotine dependence.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous alcohol and nicotine consumption occurs in the majority of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and nicotine dependence. Varenicline (Var) is used to assist in the cessation of nicotine use, while naltrexone (Nal) is the standard treatment for AUD. Despite evidence that ethanol (EtOH) and nicotine (NIC) co-use produces unique neuroadaptations, preclinical research has focused on the effects of pharmacotherapeutics on a single reinforcer. The current experiments examined the effects of Var and Nal on EtOH, NIC, or EtOH+NIC intake. METHODS: Animals were randomly assigned to one of four drinking conditions of 24-h access to a three-bottle choice paradigm, one of which always contained water. Drinking conditions were water only, 0.07 and 0.14 mg/mL NIC (NIC only), 15% and 30% EtOH (EtOH only), or 15% and 30% EtOH with 0.14 mg/mL NIC (EtOH+NIC). The effects of Var (0, 1, or 2 mg/kg) or Nal (0, 1, or 10 mg/kg) injections on maintenance and relapse consumption were determined during four consecutive days. RESULTS:Var reduced maintenance and relapse NIC intake but had no effect on EtOH or EtOH+NIC drinking. Conversely, Nal reduced EtOH maintenance and relapse drinking, but had no effect on NIC or EtOH+NIC drinking. DISCUSSION: The results indicate the standard pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and AUD were effective at reducing consumption of the targeted reinforcer but neither reduced EtOH+NIC co-use/abuse. These findings suggest that co-abuse may promote unique neuroadaptations that require models of polysubstance abuse to develop pharmacotherapeutics to treat AUD and nicotine dependence.
Authors: Roberto I Melendez; Zachary A Rodd-Henricks; Eric A Engleman; Ting-Kai Li; William J McBride; James M Murphy Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: J B Daeppen; T L Smith; G P Danko; L Gordon; N A Landi; J I Nurnberger; K K Bucholz; E Raimo; M A Schuckit Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Z A Rodd-Henricks; R L Bell; K A Kuc; J M Murphy; W J McBride; L Lumeng; T K Li Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Robert A Waeiss; Christopher P Knight; Gustavo B Carvajal; Richard L Bell; Eric A Engleman; William J McBride; Sheketha R Hauser; Zachary A Rodd Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Cassie M Chandler; Sarah E Maggio; Hui Peng; Kimberly Nixon; Michael T Bardo Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.492