Literature DB >> 30756268

Anthropometer3D: Automatic Multi-Slice Segmentation Software for the Measurement of Anthropometric Parameters from CT of PET/CT.

Pierre Decazes1,2, David Tonnelet3, Pierre Vera3,4, Isabelle Gardin3,4.   

Abstract

Anthropometric parameters like muscle body mass (MBM), fat body mass (FBM), lean body mass (LBM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) are used in oncology. Our aim was to develop and evaluate the software Anthropometer3D measuring these anthropometric parameters on the CT of PET/CT. This software performs a multi-atlas segmentation of CT of PET/CT with extrapolation coefficients for the body parts beyond the usual acquisition range (from the ischia to the eyes). The multi-atlas database is composed of 30 truncated CTs manually segmented to isolate three types of voxels (muscle, fat, and visceral fat). To evaluate Anthropomer3D, a leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to measure MBM, FBM, LBM, VAT, and SAT. The reference standard was based on the manual segmentation of the corresponding whole-body CT. A manual segmentation of one CT slice at level L3 was also used. Correlations were analyzed using Dice coefficient, intra-class coefficient correlation (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot. The population was heterogeneous (sex ratio 1:1; mean age 57 years old [min 23; max 74]; mean BMI 27 kg/m2 [min 18; max 40]). Dice coefficients between reference standard and Anthropometer3D were excellent (mean+/-SD): muscle 0.95 ± 0.02, fat 1.00 ± 0.01, and visceral fat 0.97 ± 0.02. The ICC was almost perfect (minimal value of 95% CI of 0.97). All Bland-Altman plot values (mean difference, 95% CI and slopes) were better for Anthropometer3D compared to L3 level segmentation. Anthropometer3D allows multiple anthropometric measurements based on an automatic multi-slice segmentation. It is more precise than estimates using L3 level segmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Computed tomography; Multi-atlas segmentation; Positron emission tomography

Year:  2019        PMID: 30756268      PMCID: PMC6456643          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00178-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  36 in total

1.  Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: Implications for body composition analysis.

Authors:  Georg Fuchs; Yves R Chretien; Julia Mario; Synho Do; Matthias Eikermann; Bob Liu; Kai Yang; Florian J Fintelmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measurements of adiposity as clinical biomarkers for first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Katrina N Slaughter; Theresa Thai; Shayla Penaroza; Doris M Benbrook; Elangovan Thavathiru; Kai Ding; Tina Nelson; D Scott McMeekin; Kathleen N Moore
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.

Authors:  J Lee; D Koh; C N Ong
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  A multicompartment body composition technique based on computerized tomography.

Authors:  B Chowdhury; L Sjöström; M Alpsten; J Kostanty; H Kvist; R Löfgren
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1994-04

5.  A higher body mass index and fat mass are factors predictive of docetaxel dose intensity.

Authors:  Sophie Gouérant; Marianne Leheurteur; Maher Chaker; Romain Modzelewski; Olivier Rigal; Corinne Veyret; Géraldine Lauridant; Florian Clatot
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study.

Authors:  Carla M M Prado; Jessica R Lieffers; Linda J McCargar; Tony Reiman; Michael B Sawyer; Lisa Martin; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care.

Authors:  Marina Mourtzakis; Carla M M Prado; Jessica R Lieffers; Tony Reiman; Linda J McCargar; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.665

8.  Prognostic value of components of body composition in patients treated with targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Weijie Gu; Yao Zhu; Hongkai Wang; Hailiang Zhang; Guohai Shi; Xiaohang Liu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of body fat distribution on neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in advanced breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Toshiaki Iwase; Takafumi Sangai; Takeshi Nagashima; Masahiro Sakakibara; Junta Sakakibara; Shouko Hayama; Emi Ishigami; Takahito Masuda; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Pixel-Level Deep Segmentation: Artificial Intelligence Quantifies Muscle on Computed Tomography for Body Morphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Hyunkwang Lee; Fabian M Troschel; Shahein Tajmir; Georg Fuchs; Julia Mario; Florian J Fintelmann; Synho Do
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sub-cutaneous Fat Mass measured on multislice computed tomography of pretreatment PET/CT is a prognostic factor of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated by nivolumab.

Authors:  Geoffrey Popinat; Stéphanie Cousse; Lucas Goldfarb; Stéphanie Becker; Isabelle Gardin; Mathieu Salaün; Sébastien Thureau; Pierre Vera; Florian Guisier; Pierre Decazes
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Segmentation of Abdominal Muscle and Fat on Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Park; Yongbin Shin; Jisuk Park; Hyosang Kim; In Seob Lee; Dong Woo Seo; Jimi Huh; Tae Young Lee; TaeYong Park; Jeongjin Lee; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Artificial intelligence-aided CT segmentation for body composition analysis: a validation study.

Authors:  Pablo Borrelli; Reza Kaboteh; Olof Enqvist; Johannes Ulén; Elin Trägårdh; Henrik Kjölhede; Lars Edenbrandt
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-03-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.