| Literature DB >> 30756192 |
Masashi Yahagi1, Yoshiyuki Ishii2,3, Atsuko Hara4, Masahiko Watanabe1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcomas (LMSs) of the colon are extremely rare and highly aggressive. Although treatment of gastrointestinal LMS is not standardized, surgical resection is generally performed. The fact that the tumors are usually large at the time of diagnosis may explain why no report on laparoscopic resection of a colonic LMS has appeared. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Colon; Laparoscopic surgery; Leiomyosarcoma
Year: 2019 PMID: 30756192 PMCID: PMC6372699 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-019-0579-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1a Endoscopic findings: colonoscopy revealed a large polypoidal tumor in the sigmoid colon. b Contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings: the position of the tumor is indicated; no metastasis to lymph nodes or a distant site was evident
Fig. 2Microscopic and immunohistochemical findings. a Hematoxylin-eosin staining revealed spindle-shaped cells exhibiting significant nuclear atypia. The tumor was immunohistochemically positive for α-SMA (b), desmin (c), and Ki-67 (h), but negative for c-kit (d), CD34 (e), S-100 (f), and DOG-1 (g) (× 20)
Fig. 3The sites of the portals and intraoperative views. a Portal sites: the first trocar was a 12-mm umbilical trocar and another such trocar was placed in the right lower abdomen, followed by three 5-mm trocars in the left lower and both sides of the abdomen. b The tattoo indicates the tumor site. c The arrow indicates the central ligation point of the inferior mesenteric artery. d Anastomosis was performed using the double-stapling technique
Fig. 4The resected specimen. a The tumor dimensions were 42 × 37 × 28 mm and the surface was elastic and hard. b The cross-section was white with a 5-mm peduncle
Fig. 5Timeline of clinical course: CT computed tomography
Summary of all selected cases and our case
| Case | Reference (year) | Age | Sex | Site | Diameter | Gross appearance | Mitoses | Immunohistochemistry | Procedure | Local recurrence | Metastasis | Outcome | F/U period (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [ | 54 | M | D | 3.2 | Polypoid | > 20 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | N/A | N/A | Death | 37 |
| 2 | [ | 61 | M | A | 4.2 | Sessile | > 20 | α-SMA+, c-kit-, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | – | Survived | 141 |
| 3 | [ | 75 | M | A | 6.5 | Plaque | > 20 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | N/A | N/A | Death | 6 |
| 4 | [ | 76 | F | C | 7.8 | Multinodular | > 20 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | N/A | N/A | Death | 7 |
| 5 | [ | 36 | F | S | 6.5 | Polypoid | > 20 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | Lung | Death | 38 |
| 6 | [ | 66 | M | A | N/A | Polypoid | 8 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | Liver | Death | 19 |
| 7 | [ | 41 | M | C | 7.5 | Pedunculated | > 20 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | Humerus | Survived | 185 |
| 8 | [ | 65 | M | D | 10 | Polypoid | 2 | α-SMA+, desmin−, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | + | Death | 28 |
| 9 | [ | 67 | F | T | 5.7 | Polypoid | N/A | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | – | Survived | 12 |
| 10 | [ | 77 | F | S | N/A | Intramural | 10–30 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | + | – | N/A | N/A |
| 11 | [ | 52 | M | S | N/A | Intramural | 10–30 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | – | Liver | N/A | N/A |
| 12 | [ | 70 | F | S | 3.7 | Intramural | 20 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | Open-Harrtman | – | – | Death | 4 |
| 13 | [ | 56 | M | C | N/A | N/A | N/A | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34− | Open-RHC | – | Liver | Survived | 68 |
| 14 | [ | 66 | F | S | 3 | Intramural | 20 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | OP | – | Liver | Death | 58 |
| 15 | [ | 94 | F | D | 25 | Type 2 | 30 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | – | Liver | Death | 7 |
| 16 | [ | 56 | M | S | 1 | Intramural | 18 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | – | LN | Survived | 60 |
| 17 | [ | 78 | F | S | 8.5 | Type 2 | 31 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | – | Lung | Death | 16 |
| 18 | [ | 87 | M | T | 11 | Intramural | 102 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | N/A | – | – | Death | 2 |
| 19 | [ | 66 | F | T | 4 | Polypoid | > 5 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | Open-RHC | – | – | Survived | 33 |
| 20 | [ | 65 | M | S | N/A | N/A | N/A | α-SMA+, c-kit− | OP | – | – | Survived | 12 |
| 21 | [ | 46 | M | T | 11.8 | Type 2 | 61 | α-SMA+, c-kit−, CD34−, S-100− | Open-RHC | + | – | Survived | 30 |
| 22 | [ | 89 | F | A | 4.5 | N/A | N/A | α-SMA+, c-kit− | Open-RHC | – | Liver | N/A | N/A |
| 23 | [ | 54 | M | A | 13 | Intramural | 10–12 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34− | OP | + | – | Survived | > 6 |
| 24 | [ | 59 | M | A | 10 | Exophytic | < 0.5 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit−, CD34−, s-100− | Open-RHC | – | – | Survived | 8 |
| 25 | [ | 82 | M | C | 2.2 | Polypoid | 20 | desmin+, c-kit− | Open-RHC | – | – | Survived | 14 |
| 26 | [ | 51 | F | D | 4 | Type 2 | 10 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit-, CD34-, s-100- | OP | – | – | Survived | 31 |
| 27 | Our case | 46 | M | S | 4.2 | Polypoid | 39 | α-SMA+, desmin+, c-kit-, CD34-, S-100- | Lap-sigmoidectomy | – | – | Survived | 17 |
M male, F female, C cecum, A ascending colon, T transverse colon, D descending colon, S sigmoid colon, N/A not available, SMA smooth muscle actin, OP open partial colectomy, RHC right hemicolectomy, Lap laparoscopic, LN lymph node, F/U follow-up