Literature DB >> 30756177

Long-term outcomes after high-energy open tibial fractures: Is a salvaged limb superior to prosthesis in terms of physical function and quality of life?

C Frisvoll1,2, J Clarke-Jenssen1, J E Madsen1,2, G Flugsrud1, F Frihagen1, G S Andreassen1, T Bere3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe complication rates and long-term functional outcomes among patients with amputated versus reconstructed limb after high-energy open tibial fractures.
METHODS: Patients treated operatively for a high-energy open tibial fracture, classified as Gustilo-Anderson (GA) grade 3, at our hospital in the time period 2004-2013 were invited to a clinical and radiographic follow-up at minimum 2 years after injury. Eighty-two patients with 87 GA grade 3 fractures were included. There were 39 type GA 3A, 34 GA 3B, and 14 GA 3C.
RESULTS: The GA 3A reconstruction group had the lowest complication rate and the best long-term outcome scores at mean 5 years (range 2-8 years) after injury. Within the group of GA 3B and 3C fractures, we found no significant differences in long-term outcomes among patients with reconstructed versus amputated limbs. The mean physical component summary score of the SF-36 in the reconstruction versus amputation group was 54.2 (95% CI 46.3-62.1) versus 47.7 (95% CI 32.6-62.2), respectively (p = 0.524), while the mean mental component summary score was 63.7 (95% CI 50.6-71.8) versus 59.2 (95% CI 48.8-68.0), respectively (p = 0.603). On the 6-minute walk test, the reconstruction group walked on average 493 m (95% CI 447-535 m) versus 449 m (95% CI 384-518 m) in the amputation group. The return to work rate was 73% (16 of 22) in the reconstruction group versus 50% (7 of 14) in the amputation group (p = 0.166). The mean patient satisfaction score (VAS 0-100) was 67 (95% CI 67-77) in the reconstruction group versus 65 (95% CI 51-76) in the amputation group (p = 0.795). Regardless of the treatment strategy, the complication rate was high.
CONCLUSIONS: Amputation should be considered as a viable treatment option, equal to limb salvage, after high-energy open tibial fracture with severe vascular damage or soft tissue loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone fracture; Functional outcome; Lower leg trauma; Soft tissue damage; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30756177     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02382-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  5 in total

1.  Loading Effect of Prosthetic Feet's Anthropomorphicity on Transtibial Osseointegrated Implant.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Laurent Frossard
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Reflections from London's Level-1 Major Trauma Centres during the COVID crisis.

Authors:  Ramon Tahmassebi; Peter Bates; Alex Trompeter; Rajarshi Bhattacharya; Ibraheim El-Daly; Lucky Jeyaseelan; Michael Pearse
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  Surgical treatment outcome after serial debridement of infected nonunion-A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Stefanie Kern; Nike Walter; Lydia Anastasopoulou; Reinhard Schnettler; Christian Heiss; Volker Alt
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-27

4.  Analysis of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure for the treatment of septic pilon fracture nonunion.

Authors:  Thomas Rosteius; Sebastian Lotzien; Matthias Königshausen; Valentin Rausch; Charlotte Cibura; Björn Behr; Markus Lehnhardt; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Jan Geßmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of patient-reported outcomes at one year after injury between limb salvage and amputation: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Taketo Kurozumi; Takahiro Inui; Yuhei Nakayama; Akifumi Honda; Kentaro Matsui; Keisuke Ishii; Takashi Suzuki; Yoshinobu Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.