| Literature DB >> 30755219 |
Weerachai Pipatrattanaseree1,2, Arunporn Itharat3,4, Nichamon Mukkasombut1,2, Ubonwan Saesiw1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The root of Baliospermum montanum has been used as an ingredient of traditional Thai medicines for the treatments of several diseases including itching eczema, muscle and joint inflammation, and cancer. Few studies have been done on phytochemical components of this root. In this study, we isolated major compounds of the crude ethanolic extract of B. montanum root and developed and validated a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the determination of its major components. We then investigated anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of the extract.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-allergy; Anti-inflammation; Baliospermum montanum; Cytotoxicity; Propiophenones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30755219 PMCID: PMC6373163 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2449-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Inhibitory effect of isolated compounds on LPS-induced nitric oxide release from RAW 264.7 cell lines
| Sample | %Inhibition at various concentration (μg/mL) | IC50(μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 50 | ||
| Crude extract | – | 16.65 ± 6.18 (92.51 ± 2.14) | 32.42 ± 5.42 (89.44 ± 3.74) | 54.64 ± 2.23 (83.49 ± 2.66) | 68.38 ± 1.04 (78.82 ± 2.83) | 6.06 ± 0.43* |
| Compound 1 | – | 2.66 ± 0.23 (84.66 ± 7.91) | 3.91 ± 3.03 (89.71 ± 12.08) | 14.41 ± 1.71 (84.71 ± 9.65) | 69.15 ± 2.49 (80.46 ± 3.10) | 40.40 ± 1.32* |
| Compound 2 | – | 7.09 ± 6.86 (94.52 ± 10.55) | 11.12 ± 9.89 (88.81 ± 8.07) | 8.69 ± 6.93 (80.85 ± 7.39) | 58.83 ± 3.59 (90.39 ± 9.92) | 33.61 ± 5.25* |
| Compound 3 | – | −0.82 ± 3.26 (102.40 ± 2.17) | 2.64 ± 0.31 (96.95 ± 0.98) | 14.59 ± 3.43 (97.27 ± 4.43) | 34.44 ± 3.07 (91.62 ± 3.87) | > 50* |
| Prednisolone (Positive control) | 19.82 ± 3.43 (100.40 ± 12.94) | 47.72 ± 6.24 (84.28 ± 4.56) | 69.94 ± 3.76 (89.46 ± 2.28) | 77.94 ± 8.12 (80.78 ± 2.71) | – | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
Data performed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments. Mean difference of IC50 data of tested sample and positive control were compared by Student’s t-test. *Significant difference at p-value < 0.05
Fig. 1Chemical structures of propiophenons isolated from ethanolic extract of B. montanum root
Fig. 2Effect of ethanolic extract of B. montanum root and the isolated propiophenones at concentration of 50 μg/mL on β-hexosaminidase release from RBL-2H3 cells. Results are present as mean ± SD from triplicate experiment. Mean differences between sample and positive control were analyzed by student’s t-test. *Significant difference comparing tested sample and positive control analyzed by Student’s t-test (p-value < 0.05)
Inhibitory effect of crude ethanolic extract and isolated compounds from Baliospermum montanum root on releasing of β-hexosaminidase from RBL-2H3 cell line
| Sample | %Inhibition at various concentraction (μg/ml) | IC50 (μg/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 50 | 100 | ||
| Crude extract | – | 21.59 ± 0.59 | 81.77 ± 5.94 | 92.28 ± 1.84 | 94.13 ± 2.49 | 4.97 ± 0.43* |
| Compound 1 | −7.88 ± 3.01 | 4.84 ± 3.46 | 29.40 ± 2.01 | 77.74 ± 3.60 | – | 21.20 ± 2.01 |
| Compound 2 | −5.37 ± 2.30 | 15.05 ± 1.71 | 30.37 ± 6.70 | 75.18 ± 6.47 | – | 26.25 ± 6.06 |
| Compound 3 | −14.21 ± 5.67 | 8.52 ± 2.93 | 17.38 ± 5.72 | 60.84 ± 8.98 | – | 44.42 ± 7.33* |
| Chlorpheniramine (Positive control) | – | 14.89 ± 1.57 | 36.17 ± 2.84 | 71.43 ± 11.01 | 81.27 ± 9.51 | 17.74 ± 1.61 |
Data performed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments. Mean difference of IC50 data of tested sample and positive control were compared by Student’s t-test. * Significant difference at p-value < 0.05
Fig. 3Effect of ethanolic extract of B. montanum root and the isolated propiophenones at concentration of 50 μg/mL on NO production from RAW 264.7 cells. Results are presented as mean±SD from triplicate experiment. Mean differences between sample and positive control were analyzed by student’s t-test. *Significant difference comparing tested sample and positive control analyzed by Student’s t-test (p-value < 0.05)
Cytotoxic activity of the crude ethanolic extract and the isolated compounds against cancerous liver cells (HepG2 and KKU-M156) and normal cells (HaCaT)
| Sample | IC50 (μg/mL) (Selective index) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | KKU-M156 | HaCaT | |
| Crude extract | 0.06 ± 0.02* (> 100) | 0.16 ± 0.02* (> 100) | > 100* |
| Compound1 | 87.07 ± 1.36* (> 1.15) | 58.32 ± 5.95* (> 1.71) | > 100* |
| Compound2 | 47.61 ± 1.20* (> 2.10) | 95.65 ± 0.48* (> 1.04) | > 100* |
| Compound3 | 90.33 ± 5.65* (> 1.11) | 83.38 ± 5.20* (> 1.20) | > 100* |
| Vincristine | 0.013 ± 0.0006 (< 0.008) | 0.0030 ± 0.0015 (< 0.033) | < 0.0001 |
Data performed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments. Mean difference of IC50 data of tested sample and positive control were compared by Student’s t-test. *Significant difference at p-value < 0.05
Fig. 4HPLC chromatogram of blank (methanol)) (a), standard solution (10 μg/mL) (b) and crude extract solution in methanol (4 mg/mL) (c)
Fig. 5Overlay UV spectra of compound 1 (a) and compound 2 (b) in crude extract solution (4 mg/mL) compared with respective standards in standard solution (10 μg/mL); overlay UV spectrum of each compound at peak start, peak apex and peak end: compound 1 (c) and compound 2 (d)
Linearity, range, LOD and LOQ of compound 1 and compound 2
| Compounds | Validation parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linearity | Range (μg/mL) | LOD (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) | |
| Compound 1 | Y = 29.32x + 10.02; r2 = 0.9998 | 5–50 | 0.05 | 0.2 |
| Compound 2 | Y = 30.71x + 31.60; r2 = 1 | 10–100 | 0.05 | 0.2 |
Accuracy and precision of quantitative method for determination of compound 1 and compound 2 in ethanolic extract of root of B.montanum
| Compounds | Spiked concentration (μg/mL) | Concentration found (μg/mL; Mean ± SD) | RSD | %Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-run (n = 3) | ||||
| Compound 1 | 15 | 14.94 ± 0.32 | 2.1 | 98.3–102.0% |
| 25 | 24.97 ± 0.38 | 1.5 | ||
| 40 | 40.65 ± 0.39 | 1.0 | ||
| Compound 2 | 30 | 29.63 ± 0.11 | 0.4 | 98.3–102.3% |
| 50 | 50.04 ± 1.18 | 2.4 | ||
| 80 | 81.24 ± 1.63 | 2.0 | ||
| Inter-run ( | ||||
| Compound 1 | 15 | 14.91 ± 0.20 | 1.3 | 97.7–102.0% |
| 25 | 24.87 ± 0.29 | 1.2 | ||
| 40 | 40.43 ± 0.44 | 1.1 | ||
| Compound 2 | 30 | 29.83 ± 0.40 | 1.3 | 98.0–103.0% |
| 50 | 50.19 ± 0.87 | 1.7 | ||
| 80 | 81.38 ± 1.03 | 1.3 | ||