Literature DB >> 30755016

Predictors of response to exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease - a subanalysis of the SAINTEX-CAD study.

Isabel Witvrouwen1,2, Nele Pattyn3, Andreas B Gevaert1,2, Nadine Possemiers4, Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck5,6, Veronique A Cornelissen3, Paul J Beckers4, Luc Vanhees3, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck1,2,4.   

Abstract

Exercise training improves peak oxygen uptake, an important predictor of mortality in coronary artery disease patients. The influence of clinical and disease characteristics on training response is not well established in coronary artery disease. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether baseline cardiovascular disease variables and training intensity can predict the maximal aerobic response to exercise training. The Study on Aerobic INTerval EXercise training in coronary artery disease patients (SAINTEX-CAD) previously showed that 12 weeks of aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improved peak oxygen uptake in coronary artery disease patients. We identified 24 exercise non-responders (change peak oxygen uptake <1 ml/kg/min) among 167 participants in SAINTEX-CAD. In a between-group comparison, exercise non-responders were older, their baseline peak oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake efficiency slope were higher, and exercise non-responders were more frequently included after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (all p < 0.05). In multiple logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio = 1.11 (1.04-1.18), p = 0.001), history of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio = 3.31 (1.12-9.76), p = 0.030) and higher baseline peak oxygen uptake (odds ratio = 1.16 (1.06-1.27), p = 0.001) were independent predictors of exercise non-response. In multiple linear regression analysis, age (ß = -0.605, p = 0.001), history of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ß = -15.401, p = 0.010), training intensity (ß=0.447, p = 0.008), baseline physical activity (ß=0.014, p = 0.003) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (ß = -0.014, p < 0.001) predicted percentage change in peak oxygen uptake and explained 41% of the variability in percentage change in peak oxygen uptake. To summarize, 14% of coronary artery disease patients were exercise non-responders. Higher baseline peak oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake efficiency slope, history of elective percutaneous coronary intervention, older age, lower training intensity and lower baseline physical activity were predictors of training non-response. Identification of patients with a large likelihood of non-response is a first step towards patient tailored exercise programmes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; exercise training; peak oxygen uptake response

Year:  2019        PMID: 30755016     DOI: 10.1177/2047487319828478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  9 in total

1.  Predictors of Improved Aerobic Capacity in Individuals With Chronic Stroke Participating in Cycling Interventions.

Authors:  Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; Amanda Penko; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Dermot Phelan; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Randal J Thomas; Amanda R Bonikowske; Shane M Hammer; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 23.213

3.  Age-Related Differences for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jenna L Taylor; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Audry Chacin-Suarez; Joshua R Smith; Ray W Squires; Randal J Thomas; Bruce D Johnson; Thomas P Olson; Amanda R Bonikowske
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 4.  The Effect of Exercise Training During Pregnancy to Improve Maternal Vascular Health: Focus on Gestational Hypertensive Disorders.

Authors:  Isabel Witvrouwen; Dominique Mannaerts; An M Van Berendoncks; Yves Jacquemyn; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Therapist Driven Rehabilitation Protocol for Patients with Chronic Heart and Lung Diseases: A Real-Life Study.

Authors:  Carla Simonelli; Michele Vitacca; Nicolino Ambrosino; Simonetta Scalvini; Francesca Rivadossi; Manuela Saleri; Aubin G Fokom; Ilaria Speltoni; Riccardo Ghirardi; Mara Paneroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Predictors of Changes in Peak Oxygen Uptake After Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Importance of Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance.

Authors:  Kasara A Little; Joshua R Smith; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Audry S Chacin Suarez; Jenna L Taylor; Shane M Hammer; Karen M Fischer; Amanda R Bonikowske; Ray W Squires; Randal J Thomas; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-02

7.  Cardiac Rehabilitation in Advanced aGE after PCI for acute coronary syndromes: predictors of exercise capacity improvement in the CR-AGE ACS study.

Authors:  Samuele Baldasseroni; Maria Vittoria Silverii; Alessandra Pratesi; Costanza Burgisser; Francesco Orso; Giulia Lucarelli; Giada Turrin; Andrea Ungar; Niccolò Marchionni; Francesco Fattirolli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Predictors for one-year outcomes of cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular risk factor control after cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients: The EU-CaRE study.

Authors:  Prisca Eser; Thimo Marcin; Eva Prescott; Leonie F Prins; Evelien Kolkman; Wendy Bruins; Astrid E van der Velde; Carlos Peña Gil; Marie-Christine Iliou; Diego Ardissino; Uwe Zeymer; Esther P Meindersma; Arnoud W J Van'tHof; Ed P de Kluiver; Matthias Wilhelm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Changes and prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in elderly patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation: The EU-CaRE observational study.

Authors:  Thimo Marcin; Prisca Eser; Eva Prescott; Leonie F Prins; Evelien Kolkman; Wendy Bruins; Astrid E van der Velde; Carlos Peña Gil; Marie-Christine Iliou; Diego Ardissino; Uwe Zeymer; Esther P Meindersma; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Ed P de Kluiver; Matthias Wilhelm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.