Literature DB >> 30754068

Higher Axial Tibiofemoral Rotation and Functional Outcomes with Mobile-Bearing Compared with Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty at 1- but Not at 2-Year Follow-Up-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Joicemar Tarouco Amaro1, João Victor Novaretti2, Diego Costa Astur2, Elton Luiz Batista Cavalcante1, Adilson Góes Rodrigues Junior1, Pedro Debieux3, Camila Cohen Kaleka1, Moisés Cohen2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine in vivo knee kinematics and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at 1- and 2-year follow-up. This prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed from November 2011 to December 2012. A total of 64 patients were randomized to fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA groups (32 patients in each group). All patients were evaluated with the following: three-dimensional in vivo knee kinematics analysis during gait, stepping up and stepping down stair steps, and getting up from and sitting on a chair; and knee range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures (Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale [KOS-ADLS] and pain visual analog scale [VAS]) at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and percentages) were calculated for all variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test if variables were normally distributed. A Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables between patients in the two groups. The chi-square test was used to compare the groups with respect to categorical variables. The α level for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean axial tibiofemoral rotation in patients who underwent mobile-bearing TKA was significantly higher during gait (13.3 vs. 10.7), stepping up (12.8 vs. 10) stair steps, and getting up (16.1 vs. 12.1) from a chair compared with fixed-bearing TKA patients at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). KOS-ADLS function score was significantly higher in the mobile-bearing compared with the fixed-bearing TKA group (32 vs. 27.7) at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). No significant difference in kinematics and clinical outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA groups was observed at 2-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Based on the results of this study, mobile-bearing TKA allowed a higher degree of rotation when walking, stepping up stair steps, and standing up from a chair, and had higher functional outcomes compared with fixed-bearing TKA at 1-year follow-up. However, no difference in in vivo kinematics or in clinical outcomes was observed between fixed- and mobile-bearing prostheses at 2-year follow-up. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30754068     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1678675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  2 in total

Review 1.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Zeng; Meng-Ning Yan; Hui-Wu Li; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.