Literature DB >> 30753373

Homografts versus stentless bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position: a multicentre propensity-matched comparison in patients younger than 20 years.

Supreet P Marathe1,2, Douglas Bell2,3, Kim Betts4, Sajid Sayed5, Benjamin Dunne5, Cameron Ward1,2, Chris Whight3, Homayoun Jalali3, Prem Venugopal1,2, David Andrews5, Nelson Alphonso1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of pulmonary homografts with stentless bioprosthetic valves [Medtronic Freestyle™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)] in the pulmonary position in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) younger than 20 years.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2017, 215 patients were retrospectively identified from hospital databases in 3 congenital heart centres in Australia. Valve performance was evaluated using standard criteria. Propensity score matching was used to balance the 2 treatment groups.
RESULTS: Freedom from reintervention for patients who received a pulmonary homograft (n = 163) was 96%, 88% and 81% at 5, 10 and 15 years and for patients who received a Freestyle™ valve (n = 52) was 98%, 89% and 31% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Freedom from structural valve degeneration for patients with a homograft was 92%, 87% and 77% at 5, 10 and 15 years and for patients with a Freestyle valve was 96%, 80% and 14% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. In the first 10 years, there was no difference in outcomes [reintervention hazard ratios (HR) = 0.69, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (0.20-2.42), P = 0.56; structural valve degeneration HR = 0.92 (0.34-2.51), P = 0.87]. After 10 years, the recipients of the Freestyle valves were at higher risk of both outcomes [reintervention HR = 7.89; 95% CI (2.79-22.34), P < 0.001; structural valve degeneration HR = 7.41 (2.77-19.84), P < 0.001]. The findings were similar when analysed by implantation in the orthotopic position and in the propensity-matched groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The Freestyle stentless bioprosthetic valve is a comparable alternative to cryopreserved pulmonary homografts up to 10 years after implantation when implanted in an orthotopic pulmonary position in patients younger than 20 years with CHD.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30753373     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  A Bicentric Propensity Matched Analysis of 158 Patients Comparing Porcine Versus Bovine Stented Bioprosthetic Valves in Pulmonary Position.

Authors:  Bunty Ramchandani; Raúl Sánchez; Juvenal Rey; Luz Polo; Álvaro Gonzalez; Maria-Jesús Lamas; Tomasa Centella; Jesús Díez; Ángel Aroca
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.101

2.  Outcomes after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with valve substitutes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Wouter Bakhuis; Kevin M Veen; Ad J J C Bogers; Jonathan R G Etnel; Carlijn C E M van Der Ven; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-07

3.  Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.

Authors:  Alexander E Kostyunin; Arseniy E Yuzhalin; Maria A Rezvova; Evgeniy A Ovcharenko; Tatiana V Glushkova; Anton G Kutikhin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.