| Literature DB >> 30753358 |
Peter Lee1, Jorge G Quintanilla2,3,4, José M Alfonso-Almazán2, Carlos Galán-Arriola2, Ping Yan5, Javier Sánchez-González6, Nicasio Pérez-Castellano3,4, Julián Pérez-Villacastín3,4,7, Borja Ibañez2,3,8, Leslie M Loew5, David Filgueiras-Rama2,3,4.
Abstract
AIMS: Cardiac optical mapping is the gold standard for measuring complex electrophysiology in ex vivo heart preparations. However, new methods for optical mapping in vivo have been elusive. We aimed at developing and validating an experimental method for performing in vivo cardiac optical mapping in pig models. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: zzm321990 In vivo imaging; Cardiac fibrillation; Cardiotoxicity; Optical mapping; Voltage-sensitive dyes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30753358 PMCID: PMC6704389 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Res ISSN: 0008-6363 Impact factor: 10.787
Figure 3Ex vivo optical fibre-based excitation ratiometry of di-4-ANBDQBS and di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA in contracting tissue. (A) Flow-chart of optical mapping experiments represented in the figure. (B) 2D optical-fibre array pressed against the surface of a Langendorff-perfused pig heart (left panel). Numerator (blue), denominator (red) and ratio (black) action potential signals from two sample fibres using di-4-ANBDQBS (middle panel), and before and after blebbistatin using di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA (right panel). (C) Sample activation maps illustrating propagation of the wavefront (left panel) and APD maps (right panel) before and after blebbistatin in the perfusate. Stimulation sites (black square pulses) are shown relative to the fibre array. (D, E) APD (D) and CV (E) comparisons (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test) before and after blebbistatin in the perfusate. Five hearts and four sample fibres per heart were included in the analysis. (F) AP signals from a 500 µm fibre, demonstrating motion artefact cancellation. Signals are in arbitrary fluorescence units. APD, action potential duration; CV, conduction velocity; LAT, local activation time.
Figure 4In vivo dye loading. (A) Left panel: Brightfield image of a sample heart loaded using balloon occlusion of the LAD coronary artery. Right panel: Fluorescence image of the same heart using red LED excitation (∼640 nm). (B) Left panel: Brightfield image of another sample heart with the dye-loading region delineated by the black dashed line. Right panels: Snapshots of a fluorescence coronary angiogram recorded at 300 fps with a high-resolution CMOS camera during dye loading in the presence of regular coronary blood flow.
Figure 5In vivo optical mapping of paced rhythms and ventricular fibrillation (VF). (A) Flow-chart of optical mapping experiments represented in the figure. (B) Action potential (AP) signals at sites ‘a’, ‘b’ (di-4-ANBDQBS), ‘c,’ and ‘d’ (di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA) on the epicardial surface of the heart obtained by exciting the tissue at ∼480 nm (numerator; blue) and ∼640 nm (denominator; red). The ratio of the numerator to denominator signal is shown in black (stimulation sites: red square pulses). Despite the substantial motion, ratiometric optical mapping could detect the AP upstroke. (C, D) Time series of normalized transmembrane voltage fluorescence intensity maps and activation map (using ratio signals) during point electrical pacing (300 ms CL). (E) DF maps during VF using di-4-ANBDQBS (left panels) and di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA (right panels). Sample AP signals and DF values are shown at sites ‘a’ (di-4-ANBDQBS) and ‘b’ (di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA). AP signals illustrate irregular electrical activity during VF. Signals are in arbitrary fluorescence units. (F) DF and SPD comparisons (Mann–Whitney U test) between in vivo (n = 4) and ex vivo (n = 5) VF episodes. DF, dominant frequency; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; SPD, singularity point density; VF, ventricular fibrillation.
Figure 1In vivo optical mapping systems. (A) Schematic representation of the system built to optically map the exposed heart in the open-chest pig during dye loading and ventricular fibrillation (dye-loading region highlighted purple). (B) Schematic representation of the modified system using an optical-fibre array to measure action potentials during regular contraction. (C) 3D representation of the system in (A) during an in vivo experiment. (D) 3D representation of the system in (B) during an in vivo experiment.
Figure 7Dye toxicity assessment. (A) Flow-chart of the toxicity protocol. (B) Sample ECG tracings (lead V2) during the monitoring period in the three subgroups. (C–F) QRS complex duration (C), corrected QT interval (D), mean blood pressure (E), and Troponin I (cTnI) (F) comparisons among subgroups. The infarct threshold criterion after percutaneous coronary interventions is represented with a brown dashed line (F). (G, H) Comparisons of T2 GraSE (G) and post-contrast T1 mapping (H) sequences among subgroups. Data are represented as mean and standard deviation, but in (E), standard errors of the means are shown because of the large variability in blood pressure measurements. Physiological ranges are represented with green dashed lines. Blue circles: solvent (n = 4). Red squares: di-4-ANBDQBS+solvent (n = 4). Purple diamonds: di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA+solvent (n = 4). # and † indicate P-values for two-way repeated measures ANOVA of solvent vs. di-4-ANBDQBS (#), and solvent vs. di-4-ANEQ(F)PTEA (†).