Kasper Højgaard Thybo1, Daniel Hägi-Pedersen1, Jørgen Berg Dahl2, Jørn Wetterslev3, Mariam Nersesjan1,4, Janus Christian Jakobsen3,5, Niels Anker Pedersen6, Søren Overgaard7,8, Henrik M Schrøder9, Harald Schmidt9, Jan Gottfrid Bjørck10, Kamilla Skovmand11, Rune Frederiksen12, Morten Buus-Nielsen12, Charlotte Voss Sørensen13, Laura Smedegaard Kruuse4, Peter Lindholm14, Ole Mathiesen15,16. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark. 5. Department of Cardiology, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark. 6. Department of Anesthesia, Gildhoj Private Hospital, Brondby, Denmark. 7. Orthopedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 8. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 9. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark. 10. Department of Orthopedics, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing, Denmark. 11. Department of Anesthesiology, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing, Denmark. 12. Department of Anesthesiology, Holbæk Sygehus, Holbæk, Denmark. 13. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark. 14. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 15. Centre of Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark. 16. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
Importance: Multimodal postoperative analgesia is widely used but lacks evidence of benefit. Objective: Investigate beneficial and harmful effects of 4 nonopioid analgesics regimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, 4-group trial in 6 Danish hospitals with 90-day follow-up that included 556 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) from December 2015 to October 2017. Final date of follow-up was January 1, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive paracetamol (acetaminophen) 1000 mg plus ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 136; PCM + IBU), paracetamol 1000 mg plus matched placebo (n = 142; PCM), ibuprofen 400 mg plus matched placebo (n = 141; IBU), or half-strength paracetamol 500 mg plus ibuprofen 200 mg (n = 140; HS-PCM + IBU) orally every 6 hours for 24 hours postoperatively, starting 1 hour before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two co-primary outcomes: 24-hour morphine consumption using patient-controlled analgesia in pairwise comparisons between the 4 groups (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .0042; minimal clinically important difference, 10 mg), and proportion of patients with 1 or more serious adverse events (SAEs) within 90 days (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .025). Results: Among 559 randomized participants (mean age, 67 years; 277 [50%] women), 556 (99.5%) completed the trial and were included in the analysis. Median 24-hour morphine consumption was 20 mg (99.6% CI, 0-148) in the PCM + IBU group, 36 mg (99.6% CI, 0-166) for PCM alone, 26 mg (99.6% CI, 2-139) for IBU alone, and 28 mg (99.6% CI, 2-145) for HS-PCM + IBU. The median difference in morphine consumption between the PCM + IBU group vs PCM alone was 16 mg (99.6% CI, 6.5 to 24; P < .001); for the PCM-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU, 8 mg (99.6% CI, -1 to 14; P = .001); and for the PCM + IBU group vs IBU alone, 6 mg (99.6% CI, -2 to 16; P = .002). The difference in morphine consumption was not statistically significant for the PCM + IBU group vs HS-PCM + IBU (8 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .005) or for the PCM-alone group vs IBU alone (10 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .004) after adjustment for multiple comparisons and 2 co-primary outcomes. There was no significant difference between the IBU-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU (2 mg [99.6% CI, -10 to 7]; P = .81). The proportion of patients with SAEs in groups receiving IBU was 15%, and in the PCM-alone group, was 11%. The relative risk of SAE was 1.44 (97.5% CI, 0.79 to 2.64; P = .18). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing THA, paracetamol plus ibuprofen significantly reduced morphine consumption compared with paracetamol alone in the first 24 hours after surgery; there was no statistically significant increase in SAEs in the pooled groups receiving ibuprofen alone vs with paracetamol alone. However, the combination did not result in a clinically important improvement over ibuprofen alone, suggesting that ibuprofen alone may be a reasonable option for early postoperative oral analgesia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02571361.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Multimodal postoperative analgesia is widely used but lacks evidence of benefit. Objective: Investigate beneficial and harmful effects of 4 nonopioid analgesics regimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, 4-group trial in 6 Danish hospitals with 90-day follow-up that included 556 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) from December 2015 to October 2017. Final date of follow-up was January 1, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive paracetamol (acetaminophen) 1000 mg plus ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 136; PCM + IBU), paracetamol 1000 mg plus matched placebo (n = 142; PCM), ibuprofen 400 mg plus matched placebo (n = 141; IBU), or half-strength paracetamol 500 mg plus ibuprofen 200 mg (n = 140; HS-PCM + IBU) orally every 6 hours for 24 hours postoperatively, starting 1 hour before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two co-primary outcomes: 24-hour morphine consumption using patient-controlled analgesia in pairwise comparisons between the 4 groups (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .0042; minimal clinically important difference, 10 mg), and proportion of patients with 1 or more serious adverse events (SAEs) within 90 days (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .025). Results: Among 559 randomized participants (mean age, 67 years; 277 [50%] women), 556 (99.5%) completed the trial and were included in the analysis. Median 24-hour morphine consumption was 20 mg (99.6% CI, 0-148) in the PCM + IBU group, 36 mg (99.6% CI, 0-166) for PCM alone, 26 mg (99.6% CI, 2-139) for IBU alone, and 28 mg (99.6% CI, 2-145) for HS-PCM + IBU. The median difference in morphine consumption between the PCM + IBU group vs PCM alone was 16 mg (99.6% CI, 6.5 to 24; P < .001); for the PCM-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU, 8 mg (99.6% CI, -1 to 14; P = .001); and for the PCM + IBU group vs IBU alone, 6 mg (99.6% CI, -2 to 16; P = .002). The difference in morphine consumption was not statistically significant for the PCM + IBU group vs HS-PCM + IBU (8 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .005) or for the PCM-alone group vs IBU alone (10 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .004) after adjustment for multiple comparisons and 2 co-primary outcomes. There was no significant difference between the IBU-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU (2 mg [99.6% CI, -10 to 7]; P = .81). The proportion of patients with SAEs in groups receiving IBU was 15%, and in the PCM-alone group, was 11%. The relative risk of SAE was 1.44 (97.5% CI, 0.79 to 2.64; P = .18). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing THA, paracetamol plus ibuprofen significantly reduced morphine consumption compared with paracetamol alone in the first 24 hours after surgery; there was no statistically significant increase in SAEs in the pooled groups receiving ibuprofen alone vs with paracetamol alone. However, the combination did not result in a clinically important improvement over ibuprofen alone, suggesting that ibuprofen alone may be a reasonable option for early postoperative oral analgesia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02571361.
Authors: John A Harvin; Rondel Albarado; Van Thi Thanh Truong; Charles Green; Jon E Tyson; Claudia Pedroza; Charles E Wade; Lillian S Kao Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Max L Willinger; Jamie Heimroth; Nipun Sodhi; Luke J Garbarino; Peter A Gold; Vijay Rasquinha; Jonathan R Danoff; Sreevathsa Boraiah Journal: Curr Pain Headache Rep Date: 2021-04-17
Authors: Sara J Hyland; Kara K Brockhaus; William R Vincent; Nicole Z Spence; Michelle M Lucki; Michael J Howkins; Robert K Cleary Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-03-16
Authors: Ulrike M Stamer; Joachim Erlenwein; Stephan M Freys; Thomas Stammschulte; Dirk Stichtenoth; Stefan Wirz Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Ulrike M Stamer; Joachim Erlenwein; Stephan M Freys; Thomas Stammschulte; Dirk Stichtenoth; Stefan Wirz Journal: Chirurg Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Ulrike M Stamer; Joachim Erlenwein; Stephan M Freys; Thomas Stammschulte; Dirk Stichtenoth; Stefan Wirz Journal: Schmerz Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Brett Doleman; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Thomas P Heinink; Hannah Boyd-Carson; Laura Carrick; Rahil Mandalia; Jon N Lund; John P Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-06-14