Literature DB >> 30747949

Association of Survival With Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization With Drug-Coated Devices.

Eric A Secemsky1,2,3, Harun Kundi1,2, Ido Weinberg3,4, Michael R Jaff3, Anna Krawisz2,3, Sahil A Parikh5, Joshua A Beckman6, Jihad Mustapha7, Kenneth Rosenfield3,4, Robert W Yeh1,2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: In a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, femoropopliteal artery revascularization with paclitaxel drug-coated devices was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality compared with non-drug-coated devices. However, to our knowledge, these findings have not been replicated in other data sources and may be subject to confounding from missing data associated with patient withdrawal and loss to follow-up. Objective: To evaluate differences in all-cause mortality between patients who were treated with drug-coated devices vs non-drug-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, multicenter retrospective cohort study included 16 560 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services beneficiaries who were admitted for femoropopliteal artery revascularization from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. All-cause mortality was analyzed through September 30, 2017. Exposures: Drug-coated devices (drug-eluting stent [DES] or drug-coated balloon [DCB]) compared with non-drug-coated devices (bare metal stent or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality analyzed through the end of follow-up.
Results: Among 16 560 patients treated at 1883 hospitals, the mean (SD) age was 72.9 (11) years, 7734 (46.7%) were men, 12 232 (73.9%) were white, 8222 (49.7%) currently or had previously used tobacco, 9817 (59.3%) had diabetes, and 8450 (51.0%) had critical limb ischemia (CLI). Drug-coated devices were used in 5989 participants (36.2%). The median follow-up was 389 days (interquartile range, 277-508 days). Among all patients, treatment with drug-coated devices was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality compared with treatment with non-drug-coated devices through 600 days postprocedure (32.5% vs 34.3%, respectively; log-rank P = .007). Similar survival trends were observed when treatment was stratified by using a DCB alone or DES with or without DCB. After multivariable adjustment, drug-coated devices were not associated with a difference in all-cause mortality compared with non-drug-coated devices (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04; P = .43). These findings were consistent among those with CLI (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.01; P = .09) or without CLI (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03; P = .20), and for those treated with DCB alone (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03; P = .17) or DES with or without DCB (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06; P = .48). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large nationwide analysis of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services beneficiaries, there was no evidence of increased all-cause mortality following femoropopliteal artery revascularization with drug-coated devices compared with non-drug-coated devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30747949      PMCID: PMC6484791          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  11 in total

Review 1.  Survival methods.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Paul C Lambert; Ghada Abo-Zaid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-05

Review 3.  SCAI consensus guidelines for device selection in femoral-popliteal arterial interventions.

Authors:  Dmitriy N Feldman; Ehrin J Armstrong; Herbert D Aronow; Osvaldo S Gigliotti; Michael R Jaff; Andrew J Klein; Sahil A Parikh; Anand Prasad; Kenneth Rosenfield; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Christopher J White
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Authors:  Kenneth Rosenfield; Michael R Jaff; Christopher J White; Krishna Rocha-Singh; Carlos Mena-Hurtado; D Christopher Metzger; Marianne Brodmann; Ernst Pilger; Thomas Zeller; Prakash Krishnan; Roger Gammon; Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck; Mark R Nehler; James F Benenati; Dierk Scheinert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniele Giacoppo; Salvatore Cassese; Yukinori Harada; Roisin Colleran; Jonathan Michel; Massimiliano Fusaro; Adnan Kastrati; Robert A Byrne
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Michael Werk; Soenke Langner; Bianka Reinkensmeier; Hans-Frank Boettcher; Gunnar Tepe; Ulrich Dietz; Norbert Hosten; Bernd Hamm; Ulrich Speck; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Survival analysis in clinical trials: Basics and must know areas.

Authors:  Ritesh Singh; Keshab Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2011-10

8.  Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial.

Authors:  Gunnar Tepe; John Laird; Peter Schneider; Marianne Brodmann; Prakash Krishnan; Antonio Micari; Christopher Metzger; Dierk Scheinert; Thomas Zeller; David J Cohen; David B Snead; Beaux Alexander; Mario Landini; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Osamu Iida; Yoshimitsu Soga; Kazushi Urasawa; Shigeru Saito; Michael R Jaff; Hong Wang; Hiroko Ookubo; Hiroyoshi Yokoi
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Konstantinos Katsanos; Stavros Spiliopoulos; Panagiotis Kitrou; Miltiadis Krokidis; Dimitrios Karnabatidis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  31 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal disease: A real-world single-center experience.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Zachary T AbuRahma; Grant Scott; Elliot Adams; Matthew Beasley; Meghan Davis; L Scott Dean; Elaine Davis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women: Therapeutic Options in 2019.

Authors:  Ammar Saati; Noora AlHajri; Lina Ya'qoub; Waqar Ahmed; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

3.  Taking paclitaxel coated balloons to a higher level: Predicting coating dissolution kinetics, tissue retention and dosing dynamics.

Authors:  Abraham R Tzafriri; Sahil A Parikh; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Balloon-based drug coating delivery to the artery wall is dictated by coating micro-morphology and angioplasty pressure gradients.

Authors:  Abraham R Tzafriri; Benny Muraj; Fernando Garcia-Polite; Antonio G Salazar-Martín; Peter Markham; Brett Zani; Anna Spognardi; Mazen Albaghdadi; Steve Alston; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease Interventions: A Regulatory Perspective for the Practicing Clinician.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek; Rajiv Gulati; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Anthony J Windebank; Sanjay Misra; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Is There a Safety Concern for Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Arterial Disease?

Authors:  Mohamed M Gad; Antonette K Karrthik; Ahmad A Mahmoud; Ahmed N Mahmoud
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Update on paclitaxel for femoral-popliteal occlusive disease in the 15 months following a summary level meta-analysis demonstrated increased risk of late mortality and dose response to paclitaxel.

Authors:  Peter A Schneider; Ramon L Varcoe; Eric Secemsky; Marc Schermerhorn; Andrew Holden
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Krishna J Rocha-Singh; Sue Duval; Michael R Jaff; Peter A Schneider; Gary M Ansel; Sean P Lyden; Christopher M Mullin; John P A Ioannidis; Sanjay Misra; Abraham R Tzafriri; Elazer R Edelman; Juan F Granada; Christopher J White; Joshua A Beckman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Femoral-popliteal peripheral artery disease: From symptom presentation to management and treatment controversies.

Authors:  Anna K Krawisz; Aishwarya Raja; Eric A Secemsky
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 8.194

10.  Rationale and Design of the SAFE-PAD Study.

Authors:  Eric A Secemsky; Aishwarya Raja; Changyu Shen; Linda R Valsdottir; Marc Schermerhorn; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.